Morrey
Well-Known Member
Greetings! Reaching out to ask opinions as I brewed two test Pilsners with beer one in primary only, and beer two in primary then racked to secondary. I like Pilsners and enjoy them especially in the warmer months. I did a test of sorts or maybe I should call it a shortcut.
We all agree that a Pilsner needs to be especially well managed since there are no places for off flavors to hide. I have always been a traditionalist in that I felt a need to rack from primary and take them off the primary yeast cake. This is how I learned to do it.
For both beers, I used the same grain bill, hops, yeast, grain mill settings....all the same. Ferm temps 50F for the duration EXCEPT one beer I allowed to stay in the Primary FV the entire two weeks, whereas beer two I racked to secondary (still at 50F) for the second week. Both beers had two weeks in the ferm chamber, only difference one beer was racked to secondary after week one while the other stayed in primary both weeks.
I keg lagered 6 weeks on both, and honestly, I cannot tell one spec of difference in these beers. Racking into secondary poses infection risks as well as adds a step to the process that I think I proved to myself may be unnecessary. The color is identical, clarity is same....I can't tell the difference except I marked them A and B. My wife could not tell the difference either.
Long story short....have I proved to myself racking to secondary is an unnecessary step and is being re-evaluated by home brewers?
We all agree that a Pilsner needs to be especially well managed since there are no places for off flavors to hide. I have always been a traditionalist in that I felt a need to rack from primary and take them off the primary yeast cake. This is how I learned to do it.
For both beers, I used the same grain bill, hops, yeast, grain mill settings....all the same. Ferm temps 50F for the duration EXCEPT one beer I allowed to stay in the Primary FV the entire two weeks, whereas beer two I racked to secondary (still at 50F) for the second week. Both beers had two weeks in the ferm chamber, only difference one beer was racked to secondary after week one while the other stayed in primary both weeks.
I keg lagered 6 weeks on both, and honestly, I cannot tell one spec of difference in these beers. Racking into secondary poses infection risks as well as adds a step to the process that I think I proved to myself may be unnecessary. The color is identical, clarity is same....I can't tell the difference except I marked them A and B. My wife could not tell the difference either.
Long story short....have I proved to myself racking to secondary is an unnecessary step and is being re-evaluated by home brewers?