I am sorry,change has been made.
To further support my point that the NBA is gaining in popularity, just 30 years ago it was an obscure league. The nba finals were on TV late at night on tape delay, if at all. That was in the 1980's. So the league has come a long way since then. A generation from now it could (but i dont think it will) very well surpass the nfl, especially if there is a canceled season. But my guess is that the NBA guys are just as selfish as the NFL, and both have f'ed up season next year.
The lock out a few years ago really hurt the NHL. I think the NHL playoffs get over shadowed by the start of MLB and the NBA playoffs. If they move the season a bit, so that the playoffs happen before the start of baseball, I think it would do much better as a sport.
MRbutlertron said:NHL... Flyers & Phils baby!
Ha, I was just kidding. Although I do like Princess Leia holding a beer, if that's her.![]()
What I mean is, goals in hockey are relatively rare compared to a bucket in basketball. That makes it way more likely that a team that is down by 1, 2 or 3 points will make that last second buzzer-beater and change the outcome of the game on the last shot (or at least in the last few seconds). I chose my words poorly though, a team TRYING to score a last second goal to tie or win has 'drama' whether they make it or not. But I think basketball is way more likely to have buzzer-beaters that change the outcome of the game.You think so? From a purely statistical perspective, the more scoring you have, the less likely it is that any game is decided by one score. i.e., if statistics were all that mattered, you would have fewer NBA games decided by a single bucket than NHL games decided by a single goal. I haven't actually done any research, so have no idea, but I would bet that this is actually the case
But then, maybe your meaning of "dramatic ending" would include things like a basketball team coming back from down 5 with 2 minutes to go. Certainly that is much more likely in basketball.
I don't think that moving the season changes the sport, it just gets you more casual fans with nothing better to watch (although I don't know when you would do it with March Madness in March and April and the Super Bowl in February). I do see your point though. And as far as your enthusiasm about the growth of basketball, the NHL as you point out, was severely hurt by the lockout. IIRC, they were actually getting better ratings than MLB and the NBA the 2-3 seasons prior to the lockout. It's been a tough uphill climb since then. If the NBA were to lose an entire season due to a lockout half the fans (at least all the casual ones) would walk away from the game for a very long time. Especially if the NBA was relegated to a second rate cable network as the NHL has been. The NFL on the other hand won't lose hardly anyone and will remain the most popular sport in this country. And no sport will ever touch the popularity of soccer worldwide.
I think it was John Madden who said that one reason NFL does so well is that it leaves you wanting more. MLB and NBA over-saturate with games to the point that many/most fans just want the friggin endless season to end so the playoffs can begin (can't speak to NHL because I don't pay any attention to it).Of course that means having less games, or starting the season early - and it already starts pretty early, so it would never happen. Owners want more games. But the NHL and NBA could benefit from less games, which is why the NFL does so well. Each game actually matters.
I didnt say it would change the sport, but it would do better. The NHL playoffs could start right after the superbowl, when sports fans are starved and have nothing to watch but mediocre nba regular season and finish mid march before march madness. Also, the NCAA is somewhat sane, and they have their games on during the day mostly, leaving time for the NHL to have the premiere time slot which is like 9pm at night or later est.
Of course that means having less games, or starting the season early - and it already starts pretty early, so it would never happen. Owners want more games. But the NHL and NBA could benefit from less games, which is why the NFL does so well. Each game actually matters.
I think it was John Madden who said that one reason NFL does so well is that it leaves you wanting more. MLB and NBA over-saturate with games to the point that many/most fans just want the friggin endless season to end so the playoffs can begin (can't speak to NHL because I don't pay any attention to it).
The 2010 TCU team would probably disagree. As would several other recent teams (Boise State and Utah) that went undefeated and never got so much as a sniff of a Nat Champ game. An arguement can be made that NO game counts in NCAA football because there is no 'real' champion, just a popularity-contest-winner.Like I said every game in every sport matters (even baseball's 162) but I think college football has the market cornered for the "each game counts the most" argument.