• Please visit and share your knowledge at our sister communities:
  • If you have not, please join our official Homebrewing Facebook Group!

    Homebrewing Facebook Group

Obnoxious Football Trash Talk Thread

Homebrew Talk

Help Support Homebrew Talk:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
A) Worlds worst decision to throw the ball in that situation. The coach lost the game for the Hawks. Given what Lynch was doing and what happened in the NFC Championship game with Wilson, it was not only a horrible call from a game situation standpoint, it was a horrible call for player development. That pass could haunt Wilson for the rest of his life.

B)If pass interference is defined by the defender making contact before the ball gets there, that was clearly pass interference. Not that they'd ever make that call in a million years, it's too bang/bang.

C) Obnoxious hat off. None of that matters. It was a phenomenal game, and from 2 teams I pretty much hate...I enjoyed the hell out of it. Can't help but be jealous of Cape this morning. I always wondered if the Fins ever made it to the SB (there's some comedy relief for ya!) if it would be worth it to attend the game, and Cape got to see his team win a world championship in an amazing game. Congrats Pats fans, I hate ya, because I ain't ya. Dicks.
 
4sfer6.jpg

cat!! Look!!! It's a photoshop meme!!! You love those!!!!!
 
They hadn't called a speck of pass interference all night (mostly to Seattle's benefit), they weren't going to start then. And even though Butler made contact a split second before the ball got there, you don't usually see them call PI in that situation. When the defender's making a play on the ball like that, they usually let 'em. He's got the right to make the catch, too.
 
Not trying to be obnoxious here....

It was a great game to watch without having anything invested in either team. The Seahawks were clearly the better team but choked in the 4th quarter. The Pats defense was much better than I anticipated but their offense, aside from Edelman, wasn't very impressive. The Pats run game was atrocious. Brady looked every bit like a 37 year old quarterback. Wilson - he played like **** most of the game. At the end of the day it was the Seahawks to lose (10 pt lead at one point and that final drive) and they blew it. Congrats to NE*.
 
Not trying to be obnoxious here....

It was a great game to watch without having anything invested in either team. The Seahawks were clearly the better team but choked in the 4th quarter. The Pats defense was much better than I anticipated but their offense, aside from Edelman, wasn't very impressive. The Pats run game was atrocious. Brady looked every bit like a 37 year old quarterback. Wilson - he played like **** most of the game. At the end of the day it was the Seahawks to lose (10 pt lead at one point and that final drive) and they blew it. Congrats to NE*.

Even when you're not being intentionally obnoxious, this is nonsense.

The Pats running game wasn't great - but Seattle's defense will do that to people. Brady made one REALLY bad throw that was intercepted in the end zone, the other pick was just a great play by the defender. He still completed nearly three-quarters of the passes he threw. Spread the ball around just like in the old days. "Chains" Vereen made some nifty catches. Amendola's made some plays. Gronk was Gronk; not sure how you can ignore his catches.

And Seattle; for all the Lynch-mob mentality, he only averaged what, 4.2 a carry? Russell Wilson looks good when they let him play backyard football, but all of his long passes, he just looks like he's lobbing them in there.

Seattle's a terrific defensive team and Lynch really is the best running back in the league, but if you put Wilson on, say... the New York Jets, they's still a four- or five-win team.

I mean, the teams were exactly as closely matched up as you would expect - but I don't see how you could possibly has watched that game and through that Seattle was "clearly" the better team. Their defense went toe-to-toe with the defense widely acknowledged as the best in the league, and that was pretty much a draw. Seattle's better running, New England was MUCH better passing. And Seattle sucks deflated balls at situational football.
 
FCKU YOU!!!!!!!

Ray Lewis.... FCKU YOU!!!

Peter King..... FCKU YOU!!!

Jerry Rice.... FCKU YOU!!!

The David Tyree catch? FCKU YOU!!!

Jerome Bettis..... FCKU YOU!!!!

Roger Goodell.... FCKU YOU!!!!

Dick Sherman.... FCKU YOU!!!

Spygate??? FCKU YOU!!!!!

You can alllllllllllllll suck my balls!!!!!!

Bwaaaaaaaaa ahaahahahahahah!!!!!
 
People are asking why Carroll went with a pass play. The answer is he believed in his QB and wanted to have a belchfest of a post game interview on how great his QB is than Brady. We got the answer.

Now we have to listen to Sherman complain about having Tommy John surgery for his busted hymen. Boo hoo!
 
That's bullsh!t. Brady is an over the hill, lucky, has-been. Hoppy said so.

Interesting that the over the hill, lucky has-been Brady scored more points in the fourth quarter, when it counted, than Seattle's last nine opponents combined. Hoppy probably has an explanation for that.
 
I will say this: Brady's moved up to #2 QB of all time on my list (and everyone cares about my list).

It's damn impressive to have won a super bowl after not having won one in ~10 years.

I think Staubach went 6 years between victories, Eli 4, and no one else more than 3 years between victories (at least, that's what I found in my 30 seconds of expert Google research).

And, to do so, as mentioned, by scoring 14 points in the 4th against that defense. Hats off to Brady and the Patriots. :cheers:
 
Neither have the Cheathawks or Cheat Carroll (not even a college national championship for that matter before abandoning his cheating mess at USC)...

Are you serious? I'm a big UCLA fan you can't really expect coach Pete Carroll to know Reggie Bush's parents are living in a house rent free in San Diego.

That's cheating?
 
Back
Top