Obnoxious Football Trash Talk Thread

[Cape Brewing]

Will it say something like:

Once again we see confirmation why the Patriots should be considered one of the greatest franchises in the history of the NFL?

Something to that effect?

 

[dataz722]

Will it say something like:

Once again we see confirmation why the Patriots should be considered one of the greatest franchises in the history of the NFL?

Something to that effect?

That would fit to be his false statement signature for the year.

 

[olllllo]

confirmation
should be considered

Those are awfully passive words. You have doubts I see.

 

[Dwain]

I always liked the Patriots. They could never get over the hump. When they got Bledsoe, I was very happy. He got hurt, and Bellychick screwed him out of his starting position when he came back. Go back and look at the film, Bledsoe carried that team also. So, at that point, Bellychick proved that he had no honor. Then it was revealed that he was having people film the visitor's practice and pregame. I understand that he had a hidden camera in the visitor's locker room so he and Brady could watch them big ole' naked manses together.

Patriots(Bellychick) + Patriot fans = a$$clowns

 

[Cape Brewing]

Oh gimme a f'in break. The whole filming the pregame and practices turned out to be completely false.

... and I'm so sick of this pathetic Spygate crap that people STILL whine and cry about like little girls.

It's very simple.

Is it illegal to have six guys on the sidelines, in the press box, or in a blimp above the field, with notepads, stenographers, binoculars, etc... STEALING signs?

Yes or no... is that illegal?

No. it isn't.

What IS illegal, is using a video camera. The league told teams specifically not to do it, and the Pats did it anyway.... which is why they got the big fine and loss of a draft pick.

So at the end of the day, the Pats used a camera instead of note pad. And a$$clowns are STILL crying about it.

"Booo hooo hooo they stole signs and my panties are allllll in a bunch!"

"But it's not illegal to steal signs"

"Booo hooo hooo... they stole signs! Belichick is SATAN!!! And my panties are really chafing me!"

"It's not illegal to steal signs"

"BUT MY PANTIES!!!! THEY'RE BUNCHED UP!!!"

 

[Cape Brewing]

confirmation
should be considered

Those are awfully passive words. You have doubts I see.

I gotta passive word for you.

 

[Cape Brewing]

That would fit to be his false statement signature for the year.

Really? What part of that is false?

You're telling me the 2000's Pats AREN'T among one of most dominant franchises in league history???

Really??

 

[dataz722]

They are in a **** division! Put them in a real divison and noone would notice them.

 

[Cape Brewing]

AAAAAAAHHHHH!!!!!!!!

AHAHHHHH AHAHAHAHAHAH!!!!!

OMG!!!!!




They have a weak division. That's awesome.

Lemme guess, the refs help them too!?

 

[SpanishCastleAle]

Oh gimme a f'in break. Belichick is SATAN!!! And my panties are really chafing me!

Whatever you say man.

 

[Cape Brewing]

Whatever you say man.

Tell me where I was wrong... other than the panty jokes.

 

[Cape Brewing]

The Phillies were accused of stealing pitch signs the other night in the World Series game with a camera set up in center field. ... something their old manager Larry Bowa said they were tremendous at while he was the manager. Posada was flashing multiple signs and indicators with no men on base because of it.

.. this is stealing PITCHING signs... IN A WORLD SERIES GAME.

No one says a word.... no one freaks out. No one cries for days. It was a one-day story that immediately faded away.

But the Pats use a camera instead of a notebook and people have HATED the Pats with a passion and cried about it for YEARS.

I don't get it.

 

[dataz722]

 

[Cape Brewing]

LOL... no one's crying. I'm just explaining and waiting for someone to prove me wrong.

... and I think you're the LAST person who wants me to access to that GIF.

Shall we go back a few pages and read some of your posts?

 

[dataz722]

Shall we go back a few pages and read some of your posts?

Go ahead, I still stand behind each and every one.

 

[Cape Brewing]

You can stand by 'em all you want..... you were still wailing like a colicky (sp?) baby over the refs... for like three weeks.

I was afraid you were going to short out your keyboard

 

[dataz722]

Damn man, you exaggerate more than a 3rd grader talking about his sports skills.

 

[Cape Brewing]

You do.






3456

 

[dataz722]

You do.






3456

nuh uh 123456

 

[Cape Brewing]

Uh-huh....


face it... The New England Patriots... all of your NFL are belong to them

 

[dunnright00]

Oh gimme a f'in break. The whole filming the pregame and practices turned out to be completely false.

False? So they were fined and lost draft picks even though it was false?

They should sue somebody then.

 

[dunnright00]

Really? What part of that is false?

You're telling me the 2000's Pats AREN'T among one of most dominant franchises in league history???

Really??

I would say the the 2000's Patriots ARE NOT the most dominant franchise in league history.

I WOULD say they were the most dominant franchise in most of the 2000s.

 

[Cape Brewing]

Lemme guess... Charger fan? That would make sense.

I'll explain.

The Patriots (they're a football team in New England), got fined for filming signals during games.

The post was about them getting in trouble for filming pregame and practices. There was only accusation of that... and that was during the Eagles (they're a team that plays in Philly... sorry... Philadelphia) and Patriots Super Bowl.

Which... after the league looked into it, it was learned that those accusations... that the Pats had filmed the pregame and practices... was absolutely false.

It's ok. you probably don't watch football so you wouldn't have known the nuance there.

 

[dataz722]

I would say the the 2000's Patriots ARE NOT the most dominant franchise in league history.

I WOULD say they were the most dominant franchise in most of the 2000s.

That I could agree with.

 

[the_bird]

He didn't say that they were THE most dominant.

You've got to include them in the conversation, though. Those Packer teams from the '60s, the Steelers from the '70s, those Montana/Rice 49ers and the Patriots since 2001. Since Bob Kraft bought the team, who else is even really close?

 

[Cape Brewing]

I would say the the 2000's Patriots ARE NOT the most dominant franchise in league history.

I WOULD say they were the most dominant franchise in most of the 2000s.

I never said they were THE most dominant.... I said "among the most dominant" and if you don't think that's a true statement then you're high

 

[Cape Brewing]

He didn't say that they were THE most dominant.

You've got to include them in the conversation, though. Those Packer teams from the '60s, the Steelers from the '70s, those Montana/Rice 49ers and the Patriots since 2001. Since Bob Kraft bought the team, who else is even really close?

Thank you....


... and they're not done yet

 

[dataz722]

I never said they were THE most dominant.... I said "among the most dominant" and if you don't think that's a true statement then you're high

No more so than the colts.

 

[Cape Brewing]

Ok, now you're just being ridiculous.

 

[the_bird]

Colts are and have been a great team, but one title (and still a lot more playoff failures than successes) does not a dynasty make.