ChshreCat
Well-Known Member
He was a screen full of jibberish?
Green Bay has no one to blame but themselves. It should have never come to the refs. Everyone knows what you're suppose to do with a Hail Mary Pass. KNOCK IT DOWN! What was Jennings doing trying to catch it?
I think that is what Sam Sheilds was going to do. Tough to do from the ground though.
motobrewer said:yeah, every football analyst on the planet thinks otherwise.
a combined total of 99999999 years of football experience thinks jennings has the ball.
but you're right - we should take "Punity's" advice, a drunk, tree-f**king seattle fan, that "tates left hand had first possesion"????
Replace instant replay with a big wheel they spin to decide the outcome of disputed plays.![]()
Rhone-Dunn, the back judge who had the best view of the play and initially signaled interception, is the most experienced member of the crew. Formerly a Big 12 official, he worked the Sugar Bowl back in 2007 and arena games since then. Easley, the side judge who overruled Rhone-Dunn, is a banker from California, who has officiated high school and junior college games, both football and basketball. Elliott, the head referee who should have gotten his crew together and asked them what they saw before signaling for a touchdown, is a real estate agent in Texas who has worked high school, college, and indoor football.
This was the same crew for last week's Rams-Redskins game—one that got out of hand, and caused Mike Shanahan to tell reporters, "Never have I been involved in a game like this."
alright, one more, then i'm done:
Easley, the side judge who overruled Rhone-Dunn, is a banker from California, who has officiated high school and junior college games, both football and basketball.
They *never* call offensive pass interference on Hail Mary throws, though. People would be bitching about that aspect even if the regular refs were working the game, because the regular refs wouldn't have throw a flag for PI, either. It's not *right,* the game *should* be called consistently for the full 60 minutes... but it isn't. That's not specific to this game or these officials.
As per the "catch"... the Packers defender "caught" the ball more, but Tate sure looks like he caught it, too. The Packer guy caught it with two hands, Tate caught it with one. Catching the ball with two hands does not trump catching it with one hand. Looks pretty damn close to simultaneous catch to me.
Keep in mind, though, I'm *really* enjoying you Packers fans having to bitch and moan about ****ty referreeing today. Last night's game couldn't have ended any better from my point of view!
The roles were the other way around or do you not remember the Seahawk/Steeler Superbowl? The refs were horrible in that game and they affected the outcome of the game. But I'm man enough to admit that my team played like absolute CRAP and didn't deserve to win. If they'd played their game, then they'd have put it away and the officials wouldn't have mattered.
The rest of the Hawk fans and every player on that team but Taint and Carroll have my respect. Taint and Carroll can **** off.
HoppyDaze said:Because they were excited about winning the game?
The rest of the Hawk fans and every player on that team but Taint and Carroll have my respect. Taint and Carroll can **** off.
I'll say this to be my last little nugget on the final play. Why in God's name was the GB db trying to catch the ball? Knock the ball down and we don't have this stupid ending that makes no one right.
Also I heard there are GB fans that are protesting at Lambeau Field.
I'll say this to be my last little nugget on the final play. Why in God's name was the GB db trying to catch the ball? Knock the ball down and we don't have this stupid ending that makes no one right.
Also I heard there are GB fans that are protesting at Lambeau Field.
Yes Damn them for getting excited they were given a win
HoppyDaze said:Because they were excited about winning the game?
Punity said:Yes Damn them for getting excited they were given a win