HoppyDaze
Well-Known Member
To anyone who lets the game come down to one play. #butthurtsissy
Obnoxious Football Trash Talk Thread
- Thread starter Cape Brewing
- Start date
Help Support Homebrew Talk - Beer, Wine, Mead, & Cider Brewing Discussion Forum:
To anyone who lets the game come down to one play. #butthurtsissy
ChshreCat
Well-Known Member
Yeah. Caught me off guard when he announced it on Tuesday. Wonder what he's going to do.
Pats suck.
Had to add that last part to keep with the purpose of this thread.
Packer fans are pansies, too.
HoppyDaze
Well-Known Member
Patriots fans are going to cry so hard when Peyton Manning wins the MVP. Still the best QB, no doubt
HoppyDaze
Well-Known Member
I guess I'll go another Duck BCS Bowl. Yawn...
- Joined
- Jun 2, 2011
- Messages
- 3,834
- Reaction score
- 364
Huh, ESPN total QBR.
1 Peyton Manning DEN 82.4
2 Tom Brady NE 79.6
3 Matt Ryan ATL 73.9
4 Robert Griffin III WSH 73.6
5 Ben Roethlisberger PIT 71.8
6 Andrew Luck IND 71.6
7 Alex Smith SF 69.8
8 Aaron Rodgers GB 69.8
9 Eli Manning NYG 69.1
10 Matt Schaub HOU 65.8
OP
OP
There are two quarterback ratings... One is a general, stupid one, that takes a handful of statistics into consideration and scales to something ridiculous like 128.3.
The other is ESPN's own rating that they came up with about a year ago. It takes more statistics into consideration and it scales to 100 even.
I think they're both stupid... regardless where they rank Brady
The other is ESPN's own rating that they came up with about a year ago. It takes more statistics into consideration and it scales to 100 even.
I think they're both stupid... regardless where they rank Brady
- Joined
- Jun 2, 2011
- Messages
- 3,834
- Reaction score
- 364
The way I like to rate a quarterback:
Wins
Average wins per season
Division Titles
Playoff wins
Championships
All the other stuff is noise. Records are cool, and stats are great, but it comes down to team wins and championships. I would prefer to have Alex Smith and win than Tom Brady or Peyton Manning and lose. Period!
Wins
Average wins per season
Division Titles
Playoff wins
Championships
All the other stuff is noise. Records are cool, and stats are great, but it comes down to team wins and championships. I would prefer to have Alex Smith and win than Tom Brady or Peyton Manning and lose. Period!
McBrewskie
Well-Known Member
To football fans.
*Yawn*
JonGrafto
Well-Known Member
Funny... I only hear Seahawks fans saying that it was legit. Everyone else know better and thinks it was the BIGGEST screw job EVER!
OP
OP
It's still funny...
[ame]http://www.funnyordie.com/videos/2fbed587d7/tom-brady-s-wicked-accent[/ame]
[ame]http://www.funnyordie.com/videos/2fbed587d7/tom-brady-s-wicked-accent[/ame]
OP
OP
no sht... it's like nine pages of: "Nuh uh... YOU are!" "No way.. YOU ARE"
buncha FTF's
For the record, I don't give a rats' ass for either team, and I think it was simultaneous catch.
The Packers' defender was in slightly better position, but that doesn't mean that Golden Tate did not catch the ball as well. The actual rulebook does not go into specific detail about what "simultaneous catch" actually means; from my point of view, the defender caught the ball but so did Tate. The fact that it wasn't a "50/50" catch - that the Packer defender caught the ball slightly more - is irrelevant; Tate caught it, too.
But, the whole topic bores me to ****, so **** you all.
motobrewer
I'm no atheist scientist, but...
so all a person has to do is have a finger touching the football when he hits the ground for it to be a catch?
He didn't have "a finger" touching it. You're thinking of your dad and your butthole again. The ball hit Tate's left hand, and he then grabbed it with his right hand as well. Forget what the defender was doing; Tate caught the ball.
As I said, though, I don't really care, so **** off.
motobrewer
I'm no atheist scientist, but...
hm, no he didn't - at least not until they were both on the ground.
also, the defender was catching the ball cleanly in his gut with two hands.
His second hand is on the ball when they're on the way down to the ground, not after he's already down.
Whether the defender caught the ball "cleanly" or not is irrelevant. Nobody's saying that the DB didn't catch the ball, it's only a matter of whether Tate caught it as well. There's no concept of "well, the defender caught the ball better, or more cleanly, or he caught the ball more," it's entirely "was the catch made? yes/no."
It was a damn close play, but I stand by my assertion that Tate made the catch in addition to the DB. It certainly was close enough where I don't see how that gets overturned.
Now, Tate's egregious offensive-PI is another issue; THAT's what Packers fans ought to be pissed off about. It's rarely called in that situation but it's rarely as obvious as Tate's was, either. Bunch of cheaters...
OP
OP
It was totally a catch. good call by the refs.
Still. I'm bored. **** you all.
JonGrafto
Well-Known Member
^^^ The Argonauts. Who could probably beat the JETS.
motobrewer
I'm no atheist scientist, but...
mwa ha ha, dance puppets!
McBrewskie
Well-Known Member
Anyone thinking that was a catch is a dumb ****.
OP
OP
Agreed. Wasnt close to a catch. Worst call ever.
McBrewskie
Well-Known Member
Damn Russell Wilson's numbers are pretty ****ing good this year, especially for a rookie. Too bad everyone knows you can't win a Super Bowl with those guys.
OP
OP
... or an entire secondary of cheaters.... Don't forget the cheating.
OP
OP
Damn right.... Thats why the NBA pulled the Sonics out of there. The rampant cheating.
McBrewskie
Well-Known Member
Kaep isn't a rookie.
Lazarous
Well-Known Member
Cape Brewing said:
You have no room to talk smack about cheating...why don't you go film the texans practices
Similar threads
