I also brew a lot, so I am going through harvested yeast pretty easily.
Just out of curiosity, how often do you brew? I brew about every other week, and sometimes I feel like that is a lot.
I also brew a lot, so I am going through harvested yeast pretty easily.
Just out of curiosity, how often do you brew? I brew about every other week, and sometimes I feel like that is a lot.
Does anyone else find 1318 to be very oxygen hungry?
If by "oxygen hungry" you mean one of the gnarliest looking top cropping yeasts I have ever seen....
Then yes.
I use 1318 a lot in these beers, what do you mean by oxygen hungry. Its a crazy yeast but I love the fruit and tart it brings to these beers coupled with the fruity hops. It can be a little finicky and by that I've found if you don't raise the temp up after primary fermentation it can possibly stall but I've never had that prob and I've also had batches attenuate better than the Conan I use.
Are you *sure* it wasn't 79.86 IBU's???
No, I mean that maybe it demands more dissolved oxygen than a similar ale yeast. Pure speculation, and maybe it has more to do with a temperature rise. I've had it refuse to drop the last 8 points or so for like 3 days, then magically it was done, and it was kept at a steady 72F, but I don't think I shook the carboy as much as I normally do with 1318.
You don't have to shake it just raise the temp with 1318 and it'll hit its fg but there will still be a monster yeast cake on top, first time I used it I had to sanitize a mash paddle the plastic one that comes with most kits and use the handle to break open a hole so I could let the dry hops get in and after those went in a couple days later the whole cake dropped on its own.
I never rack to secondary unless I'm racking onto something (wood, fruit) or the beer will be fermenting for more than 4-5 weeks. I bottle and will go from primary to bottling bucket on bottling day. On a relatively low gravity beer like this one, I will primary for 11-15 days, then bottle. This is what works for me.
has anyone tried WY1450, Denny's Favorite 50 yet in this or another NE IPA? i used it in the Tired Hands Hophands recipe Ed Coffey has on his site. just pitched yesterday. i used WY1450 in an american strong ale and loved the mouthfeel and cloudiness, so thought i'd try it!
Hey thanks for the info! Ill skip secondary. One more question then. Should I bother cold crashing? I am using a 6.5 gal Big Mouth plastic carboy with a spout at the bottom. I am thinking I might be able to use that spout to tube directly into bottling bucket without having to use a siphon.
has anyone tried WY1450, Denny's Favorite 50 yet in this or another NE IPA? i used it in the Tired Hands Hophands recipe Ed Coffey has on his site. just pitched yesterday. i used WY1450 in an american strong ale and loved the mouthfeel and cloudiness, so thought i'd try it!
I wouldn't bother to cold crash this style. It's supposed to be hazy.
For those that don't cold crash, what are you doing about hop debris?
I didn't cold crash my latest batch and the hop debris was insane. I probably left over a gallon in each fermenter so my ten gallon batch turned into 8 gallons (and I racked to secondary because I was harvesting yeast)... I figured I would cold crash next time to see if I could get it to compact better. I don't like putting my hops in a bag either, but maybe I'll have to next time.
has anyone tried WY1450, Denny's Favorite 50 yet in this or another NE IPA? i used it in the Tired Hands Hophands recipe Ed Coffey has on his site. just pitched yesterday. i used WY1450 in an american strong ale and loved the mouthfeel and cloudiness, so thought i'd try it!
For those that don't cold crash, what are you doing about hop debris?
I didn't cold crash my latest batch and the hop debris was insane. I probably left over a gallon in each fermenter so my ten gallon batch turned into 8 gallons (and I racked to secondary because I was harvesting yeast)... I figured I would cold crash next time to see if I could get it to compact better. I don't like putting my hops in a bag either, but maybe I'll have to next time.
I wouldn't bother to cold crash this style. It's supposed to be hazy.
Sorry but I beg to differ, its not that this style is supposed to be hazy, its just that it is hazy by way of how the beer is constructed. These beers weren't originally constructed to be hazy, but to taste/smell a certain way, the haze is a by-product. It doesnt mean you should be cutting corners like not using Whirlfloc, not cold crashing, or serving the beer before its finished. Believe me, if you hop it heavily both wirhlpool and dry, use a bunch of wheat/oats etc, and a low floc yeast it will be hazy. You dont need to cut corners to ensure that.
Although this has become such conventional wisdom now that people now scoff at a NEIPA that isnt as hazy as possible...
Sorry for the rant, I just think people still need to use proper brewing practices with these beers.
You don't have to shake it just raise the temp with 1318 and it'll hit its fg but there will still be a monster yeast cake on top, first time I used it I had to sanitize a mash paddle the plastic one that comes with most kits and use the handle to break open a hole so I could let the dry hops get in and after those went in a couple days later the whole cake dropped on its own.
Sorry but I beg to differ, its not that this style is supposed to be hazy, its just that it is hazy by way of how the beer is constructed. These beers weren't originally constructed to be hazy, but to taste/smell a certain way, the haze is a by-product. It doesnt mean you should be cutting corners like not using Whirlfloc, not cold crashing, or serving the beer before its finished. Believe me, if you hop it heavily both wirhlpool and dry, use a bunch of wheat/oats etc, and a low floc yeast it will be hazy. You dont need to cut corners to ensure that.
Although this has become such conventional wisdom now that people now scoff at a NEIPA that isnt as hazy as possible...
Sorry for the rant, I just think people still need to use proper brewing practices with these beers.
So I brewed with 1318 eleven days ago and there is still krausen on top. I dry hopped at day 5 figuring I would be kegging by now but not sure if I should wait for the krausen to drop. I started at 66 but ramped it up to 72 by day 5 and it seems to be at final gravity (1.012). To dry hop, I just moved the foam with a sanitized spoon and threw the hops in loose. I generally cold crash, so will that drop it? Or should I wait till it drops on its own?
Did anyone listen to the brew strong podcast recently? It was a Q&A episode where Palmer said you shouldn't cold crash in primary and especially not too soon. Can't remember the reasons why though. I generally cold crash my IPAs after 8-14 days so I can keg. Wonder if I should change my process. Any thoughts on that?
So I brewed with 1318 eleven days ago and there is still krausen on top. I dry hopped at day 5 figuring I would be kegging by now but not sure if I should wait for the krausen to drop. I started at 66 but ramped it up to 72 by day 5 and it seems to be at final gravity (1.012). To dry hop, I just moved the foam with a sanitized spoon and threw the hops in loose. I generally cold crash, so will that drop it? Or should I wait till it drops on its own?
Did anyone listen to the brew strong podcast recently? It was a Q&A episode where Palmer said you shouldn't cold crash in primary and especially not too soon. Can't remember the reasons why though. I generally cold crash my IPAs after 8-14 days so I can keg. Wonder if I should change my process. Any thoughts on that?
I never cold crash anymore. I do move my fermenter from upstairs to downstairs for kegging around day 12 or so and let it sit until day 14 before transfer. I think that moving the keg helps the hops fall. I find that there is really no need for me to cold crash with my process - the yeast, trub, hops have all settled out at room temperature.
Was the podcast perhaps talking about the possibility of sucking oxygen back into the fermenter during cold crash?
Sorry but I beg to differ, its not that this style is supposed to be hazy, its just that it is hazy by way of how the beer is constructed. These beers weren't originally constructed to be hazy, but to taste/smell a certain way, the haze is a by-product. It doesnt mean you should be cutting corners like not using Whirlfloc, not cold crashing, or serving the beer before its finished. Believe me, if you hop it heavily both wirhlpool and dry, use a bunch of wheat/oats etc, and a low floc yeast it will be hazy. You dont need to cut corners to ensure that.
Although this has become such conventional wisdom now that people now scoff at a NEIPA that isnt as hazy as possible...
Sorry for the rant, I just think people still need to use proper brewing practices with these beers.
Excuse me. I didn't realize cold crashing was an absolute necessity to brew beer, and not crashing was cutting corners. The poster asked for opinions, and I gave mine. You could have easily given yours as well without having to call me out. Get over yourself. My process is no more right or wrong than yours.
I find that the trub is more compacted when I cold crash, so I get more beer out. And I'm fermenting in a fermentation chamber, so it's trivial for me to cold crash.I never cold crash anymore. I do move my fermenter from upstairs to downstairs for kegging around day 12 or so and let it sit until day 14 before transfer. I think that moving the keg helps the hops fall. I find that there is really no need for me to cold crash with my process - the yeast, trub, hops have all settled out at room temperature.
Was the podcast perhaps talking about the possibility of sucking oxygen back into the fermenter during cold crash?
Use an S shaped airlock. No suck back.I can see why not to cold crash if you keg I mean a keg is just a big bottle but the difference is its under co2 before if you purge it and during transfer and after so everything will drop without the addition of O2 being introduced into the system unlike like me if you cold crash your primary to long and get suck back then bottle oxidation hits a lot faster. Ive tried not cold crashing my hoppy beers and I get way to much hop debris when bottling so now I just do it for 24 hrs and try to refill the airlock with starsan. Sure some O2 is still getting in but a lot less then when I used to cold crash for 3-5 days.
I find that the trub is more compacted when I cold crash, so I get more beer out. And I'm fermenting in a fermentation chamber, so it's trivial for me to cold crash.
The podcast was Brew Strong from 7/4/16 at around 20 minutes in. Just listened again and Palmer just said to make sure the fermentation was over before cold crashing. He also said if you do it too fast, you get thermal shock and extra fatty acids and lipids released leading to staling. He went on to say you shouldn't cold crash on the yeast cake, which is the only time I ever do it. He said you get more lipids in solution. Hmmm... what to do....
Use an S shaped airlock. No suck back.
I'm sure you've heard this before, but just because the ambient temperature is 65, doesn't mean the fermenting wort will be 65. I saw it first hand on a brett beer I did with no temperature control as I was told by the brewery I got the brett yeast from to let it free rise up to the 70s. I had a thermometer with a probe taped to the side of the bucket and the temperature of the fermenting wort got up to the mid to upper 70s for a couple days during the first few days of fermentation and this was in my finished basement that was 68 at the time.I do think so much of it has to do with the individual system and process each person has in place. I only use a chamber for lagers - My basement is 58-65 year round. Upstairs is 65-70 year round..... So my entire house is basically an ale fermentation chamber
Weird. I've never had suck back with an S shaped airlock.I get suck back through my S shaped airlocks all the time with my lagers - just bubbles through in reverse. Sometimes it will even suck the star san out of the air lock.
I find that the trub is more compacted when I cold crash, so I get more beer out. And I'm fermenting in a fermentation chamber, so it's trivial for me to cold crash.
The podcast was Brew Strong from 7/4/16 at around 20 minutes in. Just listened again and Palmer just said to make sure the fermentation was over before cold crashing. He also said if you do it too fast, you get thermal shock and extra fatty acids and lipids released leading to staling. He went on to say you shouldn't cold crash on the yeast cake, which is the only time I ever do it. He said you get more lipids in solution. Hmmm... what to do....
Use an S shaped airlock. No suck back.
I get suck back through my S shaped airlocks all the time with my lagers - just bubbles through in reverse. Sometimes it will even suck the star san out of the air lock.
Weird. I've never had suck back with an S shaped airlock.
I know what you mean about Palmer and Jamil. Although I'm academic (chemist), so I enjoy his point of view. I probably won't stop cold crashing in primary, but it would be easy enough for me to set up a program on my temp controller to drop the temperature slowly instead of me manually dropping the temp from 70F to 40F and have it drop rapidly.I love John Palmer. He has a ton of knowledge. The problem I think is that he is too theoretical with everything. I have cold crashed ever manner of beer and had no problems to my taste. Just do what works for you.
You can even hear it in Jamil's voice and comments sometimes that he is getting frustrated with Palmer and his inability to just make a clear statement about what we should do. Jamil has a ton of brewing experience. Palmer has less experience but a lot of academic knowledge. The academic knowledge doesn't always translate into a homebrewed batch of beer or at least isn't as dire as you think.
I'm all for brewing research, but you have to do what tastes best and is convenient for you. I've tried racking IPAs that are young and have a ton of hops, and it can be a real PITA. Cold crashing definitely makes it easier IMHO.
I get that the air will get sucked in. What I'm saying is I've never had the starsan in an S shaped airlock get sucked in. Sorry if I wasn't clear.If you're dropping from the 60's to 30 you absolutely had air go in reverse. That is a large enough temperature change to make a noticeable pressure change. Now how much gets pulled in depends on your dead space. If you're in a secondary with almost no dead space, your pressure change won't require much to be pulled in to equalize. But if you're in a 6.5 gallon carboy with 5 gallons of beer, it definitely is.
Excuse me. I didn't realize cold crashing was an absolute necessity to brew beer, and not crashing was cutting corners. The poster asked for opinions, and I gave mine. You could have easily given yours as well without having to call me out. Get over yourself. My process is no more right or wrong than yours.
I get that the air will get sucked in. What I'm saying is I've never had the starsan in an S shaped airlock get sucked in. Sorry if I wasn't clear.
If you're dropping from the 60's to 30 you absolutely had air go in reverse. That is a large enough temperature change to make a noticeable pressure change. Now how much gets pulled in depends on your dead space. If you're in a secondary with almost no dead space, your pressure change won't require much to be pulled in to equalize. But if you're in a 6.5 gallon carboy with 5 gallons of beer, it definitely is.
If you are using plastic carboys, do not just throw a solid bung in there. You'll end up collapsing the carboy with the pressure change. It needs to equalize somehow. Either through an airlock, leaks in the fermentation vessel, or collapsing the vessel.
I know what you mean about Palmer and Jamil. Although I'm academic (chemist), so I enjoy his point of view. I probably won't stop cold crashing in primary, but it would be easy enough for me to set up a program on my temp controller to drop the temperature slowly instead of me manually dropping the temp from 70F to 40F and have it drop rapidly.
I know what you mean about Palmer and Jamil.
Enter your email address to join: