glutarded-chris
Well-Known Member
If the rice hulls absorb mash water early, then they don't hold back valuable converted sugars. Therefore, the only thing that would concern me with rice is that I can account for the absorption so that I add the correct amount of water to get the water-to-grist-ratio that I want for the mash and be able to predict the resulting extracted volume. Also, with rice, with the same weight of grain, you have more percentage of husk and therefore that reduces the amount of converted sugar you can get from a pound of rice grain compared to millet. I think the most important thing is being able to reasonably calculate/predict the volume and gravity of the collected wart. If I have to add a pound of extra grain, so be it!
The thing that really matters is the finished product and that you get what you want. The batch I brewed last weekend, I used more rice than I had used previously. It made a difference and I was not fully prepared for it. I think I will be focusing on the optimum mix of rice and millet in my future batches.
I am very interested in the fluid and heat absorption properties of rice compared to millet, buckwheat and barley. So far, for my millet and buckwheat grain bills, I have used the factors provided by Palmer for calculating the temperature of the strike water needed to hit the proper starting mash temp and the absorption rate to calculate extraction. Surprisingly, this has served me well even though Palmer's calculations were based on barley. Now as I add a larger percentage of rice, I have to question the accuracy of the calculation factors I am using. The GFHB article was not as helpful as I would have hoped. They give percentages of absorption, but how do you use that? The heat absorption and fluid absorption factors that Palmer provides gives you something that you can use.
The thing that really matters is the finished product and that you get what you want. The batch I brewed last weekend, I used more rice than I had used previously. It made a difference and I was not fully prepared for it. I think I will be focusing on the optimum mix of rice and millet in my future batches.
I am very interested in the fluid and heat absorption properties of rice compared to millet, buckwheat and barley. So far, for my millet and buckwheat grain bills, I have used the factors provided by Palmer for calculating the temperature of the strike water needed to hit the proper starting mash temp and the absorption rate to calculate extraction. Surprisingly, this has served me well even though Palmer's calculations were based on barley. Now as I add a larger percentage of rice, I have to question the accuracy of the calculation factors I am using. The GFHB article was not as helpful as I would have hoped. They give percentages of absorption, but how do you use that? The heat absorption and fluid absorption factors that Palmer provides gives you something that you can use.