Evan!
Well-Known Member
Well, I got my results in the mail. What a disappointment. I entered my chocolate coffee stout, at the behest of my friends who love the stuff (as do I). It got a 26.5. I also entered my Smoked Porter, which I think is a wonderful beer, and it got a 26.
I'm not bitter because I got low scores. I can deal with that. But now I see why so many people here tell you not to bother. All the judge's writeups seem obsessed with the damned style guidelines, no matter whether the beer is actually good or not. Case in point: I entered my smoked porter in the robust porter category, and the judges tell me that I need to lose the smokey character to be more in line with "the style". What? What the hell is that about? It's a smoked porter, ferchrissakes!
So it's clear now that it's more about making beer that is as close to the BJCP style guidelines as possible, and not as much about how good the beer is. Is that a correct assessment? Again, I'm not bitter about low scores---my beer is good, and that's what matters---but why the obsession with replicating style guidelines?
I'm not bitter because I got low scores. I can deal with that. But now I see why so many people here tell you not to bother. All the judge's writeups seem obsessed with the damned style guidelines, no matter whether the beer is actually good or not. Case in point: I entered my smoked porter in the robust porter category, and the judges tell me that I need to lose the smokey character to be more in line with "the style". What? What the hell is that about? It's a smoked porter, ferchrissakes!
So it's clear now that it's more about making beer that is as close to the BJCP style guidelines as possible, and not as much about how good the beer is. Is that a correct assessment? Again, I'm not bitter about low scores---my beer is good, and that's what matters---but why the obsession with replicating style guidelines?