• Please visit and share your knowledge at our sister communities:
  • If you have not, please join our official Homebrewing Facebook Group!

    Homebrewing Facebook Group

Mystery ingredient in Duvel?

Homebrew Talk

Help Support Homebrew Talk:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Dave Sarber

Unindicted Co-conspirator
Joined
Jul 15, 2019
Messages
2,037
Reaction score
4,678
Location
Northwest of Tucson
I like Belgian beers, and most of my brews are Belgian clones. The one that is driving me crazy is Duvel, more specifically the head on a Duvel. Large rocky head that does not dissipate, and lacing that does not slide back into the beer, but instead, dries on the sides of the glass. I have been very successful in duplicating the taste, less successful in duplicating the clarity, and an epic fail in duplicating the head. I don't want to use oats or wheat to improve the head, but lose the clarity. Anyone have any ideas?
IMG_20200409_194708077_HDR.jpg
 
Do you step mash? Do you use a gentle boil? Do you naturally carbonate or spund? Those would be the first things I would look into to improve head retention.
 
Do you step mash? Do you use a gentle boil? Do you naturally carbonate or spund? Those would be the first things I would look into to improve head retention.
Yes, I step mash, practically required for Belgian pils. As far as boil, define gentle! (I would say yes). And I bottle condition.
 
Duvel contains nothing but (besides water, hops, and yeast) Pilsner malt and a crap ton of dextrose. No secret ingredients, it is beautifully simple. The secret to that head is in process. Mashing and boiling that establishes the substrate, fermentation that does not compromise it, and intensive, natural carbonation for that fine, dense head. Homebrewers are often shocked that it's that simple, that you can get that kind of foam not only without head-forming adjuncts, but even with large amounts of protein-diluting sugar, but it is true. Like many of the world's great beers, the recipe is simple, the process is too, but execution is everything. As others mention, step mash, low intensity boil, and spunding are surely recommended. Maybe more time carbonating if you ferment to completion and then prime and bottle condition? (You could do a lot worse than having to consume batch after batch of cloned Duvel in pursuit of nailing it down though, right?)
 
Yes, I step mash, practically required for Belgian pils. As far as boil, define gentle! (I would say yes). And I bottle condition.

What is your step mash schedule, what Pilsner malt are you using, and do you get malt lot analyses sheets?

Edit: In this case, gentle boil means just barely more than a simmer for 60 minutes. Shooting for less than 10% evaporation.
 
Last edited:
What is your step mash schedule, what Pilsner malt are you using, and do you get malt lot analyses sheets?

Edit: In this case, gentle boil means just barely more than a simmer for 60 minutes. Shooting for less than 10% evaporation.
131°F for 15, 149°F for 60, 158°F for 15, mashout 168°F. I use a more vigorous boil than simmer, more around 20% evap.
Oh, and I use Dingemans pils. Usually get it from NB, no analysis sheets.
 
131°F for 15, 149°F for 60, 158°F for 15, mashout 168°F. I use a more vigorous boil than simmer, more around 20% evap.
Oh, and I use Dingemans pils.

The mash schedule looks pretty good. I would adjust it slightly to the following:
131F - Not really necessary. I would eliminate it for simplicity unless you're using the time to set mash PH before the beta rests.
149 - Keep as is or, if you can, split into three rests of 20 min each @ 144, 148, 152.
158 - Bump this up to 163F and hold it for 30 min.
168 - Bump this up to 171F and hold for 10 min. This along with the 163F rest are going to do the most for your head retention.

You're probably going to want to decrease the intensity of your boil as well. Even with just a simmer using all pilsner malt it's incredibly unlikely you will run into any issues with DMS.

Edit: If you want all of the science/more info, I would go read this blog post from Bryan. http://www.lowoxygenbrewing.com/uncategorized/foam/
 
We'll, I was planning a brew day tomorrow, just purchased some ingredients for pickup today for a Belgian pale, might give the Duvel clone another crack instead. The boil could be the issue, I noticed my previous attempts are a little darker than they should be.
 
We'll, I was planning a brew day tomorrow, just purchased some ingredients for pickup today for a Belgian pale, might give the Duvel clone another crack instead. The boil could be the issue, I noticed my previous attempts are a little darker than they should be.

I would also definitely move that 158F rest to 163F. That adjustment and reducing the intensity of your boil should help a lot. I can't recommend checking out that link enough though. You will find a lot of additional helpful information.
 
I would also definitely move that 158F rest to 163F. That adjustment and reducing the intensity of your boil should help a lot. I can't recommend checking out that link enough though. You will find a lot of additional helpful information.
Thanks for the link, very informative!
More beersperimenting tomorrow.
 
Last edited:
If you try the Duvel clone again make sure you let us know how it turns out!
Yeah, I need to road trip to the LHBS later today for ingredients for another brew, which is now postponed. I will try the Duvel tomorrow. Since I have to drive into town, I'll stop at Total Wine and pick up some more Duvel for comparison tasting.
:mug:

Hmm...and maybe some Rochefort 10...
 
Last edited:
Duvel fans will enjoy this article : Duvel's In The Detail — Duvel Moortgat's Iconic Belgian Golden Strong Ale

There's a lot of "process" - many centrifuges, minimisation of exposure to heat and oxygen etc - but the mystery ingredient that makes the head is CO2. They force carb to 2.55 vol, then add fresh yeast and sugar to take it up to 4.3 volumes of CO2. That's a lot, even by Belgian standards.
 
Saison Dupont also has amazing head retention, without any cereal adjuncts. It's quite fascinating, I think.
 
The secret to the head on Duvel is NITROGEN.

It is dosed in each bottle at packaging. Paired with the high C02 it produces that voluminous foam.
 
Why would I be joking? Nitrogen dosing in Belgian beer for head retention is very common. Orval is another one that does it.
 
Have you been drinking? OK, stupid question on a brewing forum... 😁

1 - You can't add nitrogen to bottled or othewise packaged beer
2 - Serving on nitro was literally never a thing in Belgium, it's a Guinness thing that now countless others are trying to copy/exploit
 
Have you been drinking? OK, stupid question on a brewing forum... 😁

1 - You can't add nitrogen to bottled or othewise packaged beer
2 - Serving on nitro was literally never a thing in Belgium, it's a Guinness thing that now countless others are trying to copy/exploit

Well you must not know much about packaging beer, as liquid nitrogen dosing systems for beer bottles has been around for so long its not even worth the effort to prove otherwise.... 5 min of googling on the topic will be revelatory for you. And nitro dosing bottles is completely different than serving via nitrogen. The Belgian breweries that use it are only looking to produce a voluminous, sturdy foam in their bottled products when coupled with high package C02 vol. No widget required.

I'm pretty sure both of these statements are untrue.

Sorry if it bothers you, both both are true.
 
well I learned something new today. This article doesn't mention Duvel, but it talks about all the ways nitrogen is used in the beer packaging process. I assumed that cans and bottles were purged with CO2, but apparently it's more common to use nitrogen for that purpose.

They also mention an interesting way to approximate the Guinness nitro widget effect to get dissolved nitrogen into a beer without the widget

https://beverage-master.com/2019/04/nitrogen-use-in-the-brewery-the-pour-says-it-all/
 
My first thought was flaked barley, but then I read the rest of the thread. I'm going to have to go and read the links. Dave, what yeast are you using as I also love that beer. :mug:
 
168 - Bump this up to 171F and hold for 10 min. This along with the 163F rest are going to do the most for your head retention.

You're probably going to want to decrease the intensity of your boil as well. Even with just a simmer using all pilsner malt it's incredibly unlikely you will run into any issues with DMS.

Edit: If you want all of the science/more info, I would go read this blog post from Bryan. http://www.********************/uncategorized/foam/
The link didn't work for me. Can you please give me the clif-notes version of why this is. I always thought the 170 mashout was only to kill off the enzymes and stabilize the sugars after the mash and before the boil. Thanks :bigmug:
 
Well you must not know much about packaging beer, as liquid nitrogen dosing systems for beer bottles has been around for so long its not even worth the effort to prove otherwise.... 5 min of googling on the topic will be revelatory for you. And nitro dosing bottles is completely different than serving via nitrogen. The Belgian breweries that use it are only looking to produce a voluminous, sturdy foam in their bottled products when coupled with high package C02 vol. No widget required.
Dosing bottles with nitrogen is a non-existent process. You've fallen victim to a marketing scam that insinuates that you can have nitrogen in bottled beer simply by putting the word "nitro" on the label. Anyway I don't care either for your attitude or for the nonsense you're spouting to I'm done with you.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top