I now have 4 corny kegs which I use only for bitters, I do exactly what DD says above. All my other beers including British Pales, IPA’s, Stouts and Brown Ales are bottled.
85-90% base? What's the rest then? I'd say, go for 94 % -100 % base malt. That is more realistic. I don't know about many Britsh beers that have much more than 5% crystal for example. Actually, now that I am thinking about it, I do not know any.If you’re an AHA member I gave a seminar on brewing English ales at Homebrew Con 2022 in Pittsburgh. https://www.homebrewersassociation.org/seminar/english-ales-from-classics-to-class/
Key takeaways:
1) Pick a base malt you like and let it shine. Most of my recipes are 85-90% base malt.
2) The balance should be crisp, not heavy or malty.
I don’t touch on packaging in the talk. If you’re going for real ale/cask ale, the easiest way is to bottle condition with low carbonation. If kegging, you’ll want a separate cool box/keezer at cellar temperature, and jury rig your keg to gravity dispense if you don’t have a beer engine. A friend wrote a detailed post on this, but I think it’s been taken down.
I have had good luck serving in a corny and adding CO2 in doses rather than constant pressure. Usually I can get it to the right level of initial carbonation and then add in low levels when there isn't enough pressure to serve within the keg.English ales aren't uniformly crisp, not on England anyway. But maybe there's a tendency on your side of the pond to go too heavy on the malt, I see malt heavy recipes quite often. Loads of crystal malt for example. So yes, 85-90% base is good for a lot of English ales, I think.
Yeast is important too. It's a struggle with dried yeast, at this point in time. Maybe we will get a better dried English yeast at some point.
I have friends here who serve English ale from cornies. And do a good job of it. If the beer is unpasteurised and unfiltered, and primed in the keg, and there's just enough gas applied to push the beer out of the keg, you can get a good result with English ales, very similar to cask, and I should do it myself. The only tangible difference with cask (off the top of my head) is that CO2 replaces the beer as it is drawn, instead of air. Which is a positive in my eyes.
My Porter recipe85-90% base? What's the rest then? I'd say, go for 94 % -100 % base malt. That is more realistic. I don't know about many Britsh beers that have much more than 5% crystal for example. Actually, now that I am thinking about it, I do not know any.
Are you in the Pennines? I'm on the edge.I have had good luck serving in a corny and adding CO2 in doses rather than constant pressure. Usually I can get it to the right level of initial carbonation and then add in low levels when there isn't enough pressure to serve within the keg.
No unfortunately not, I used to spend a lot of time in the area running and biking. I'm on the edge of the front range nowAre you in the Pennines? I'm on the edge.
No unfortunately not, I used to spend a lot of time in the area running and biking. I'm on the edge of the front range now![]()
OK, let's cut out dark beers and pretend that wheat and barley are just base malts, because this is what they actually deliver flavour wise.My Porter recipe
87.3% Spring Pale Malt
5.5% Chocolate
4.9% Wheat
2.5% Crystal 150L
Well the Fulller's partigyle is an obvious one, at ~7.2% light crystal, but that's certainly up at the higher end. I suspect Hobgoblin may be even higher but then that's the Thames Valley for you, at one extreme. OTOH, it's just as normal for British bitter to have no crystal at all. So yeah, US brewers tend to put way too much crystal and would be much better heading for an average of say 3%, or balancing out a bit more with invert, but it's not the only thing that goes wrong with US bitter.85-90% base? What's the rest then? I'd say, go for 94 % -100 % base malt. That is more realistic. I don't know about many Britsh beers that have much more than 5% crystal for example. Actually, now that I am thinking about it, I do not know any.
As a dumb Yank that focuses on small UK ales, I've learned that's the best method. It has served me well for decades at this point. As much as I'd like to run a cask program, there's no getting around that fact that I can't properly dispense and drink 5-6gals of bitter in a timely enough fashion to warrant trying to approximate a cask system. Bursting gas in for serving, then bleeding it off at the end of a session is a workable compromise. CAMRA will look down their noses at me, but they don't drink my beers, so they can piss off.I have had good luck serving in a corny and adding CO2 in doses rather than constant pressure. Usually I can get it to the right level of initial carbonation and then add in low levels when there isn't enough pressure to serve within the keg.
Yeah I have been tempted to rig up a beer engine to the corny. I might pick a reasonably priced one up on a trip later this year.As a dumb Yank that focuses on small UK ales, I've learned that's the best method. It has served me well for decades at this point. As much as I'd like to run a cask program, there's no getting around that fact that I can't properly dispense and drink 5-6gals of bitter in a timely enough fashion to warrant trying to approximate a cask system. Bursting gas in for serving, then bleeding it off at the end of a session is a workable compromise. CAMRA will look down their noses at me, but they don't drink my beers, so they can piss off.
When I chatted to Joe Ince the person I was with asked him why he doesn't use English hops he said "because they are terrible." I said that's a matter of opinion, because my preference is for English hops in cask ales, and things got tense!Well the Fulller's partigyle is an obvious one, at ~7.2% light crystal, but that's certainly up at the higher end. I suspect Hobgoblin may be even higher but then that's the Thames Valley for you, at one extreme. OTOH, it's just as normal for British bitter to have no crystal at all. So yeah, US brewers tend to put way too much crystal and would be much better heading for an average of say 3%, or balancing out a bit more with invert, but it's not the only thing that goes wrong with US bitter.
Anyway, I talked a bit about yeast for bitter over on THBF, and it's worth repeating here the quotes from the two co-founders of Cloudwater. For those that don't know Cloudwater is arguably the leading modern brewery in the UK, at one point Ratebeer put them #2 in the world behind Hill Farmstead, so ahead of Trillium, Treehouse, Other Half etc. So Cloudwater know their stuff. They do not use S-04 and Notty for their bitters...
Paul Jones is quoted in a great new article from Jeff Alworth on modern bitter, and an accompanying blog :
https://beerandbrewing.com/style-school-cask-bitter/
https://www.beervanablog.com/beervana/2025/4/7/the-evolution-of-cask-bitter
“Yeast is by far the most important ingredient in bitter,” says Paul Jones, cofounder of the Manchester-based brewery Cloudwater. After all, house yeasts are what made those legacy bitters distinctive. “It’s what makes someone a fan of J.W. Lees, but not so much of Holt’s, or a fan of Holt’s but not so much Harvey’s.
James Kemp used to blog at Port 66 :
https://web.archive.org/web/2018041...co.uk/yeast-brewing-myths-ideal-house-strain/
what is it about [trad bitter] that makes them so interesting and amazing? I’d thought for a while that it was malt character and quality and especially malt complexity that help create such an interesting beer at a modest abv. This was certainly a tack I tried to take when I was brewing commercially but when you look at these beers and their recipes you’ll find them to be simple and very much the same....This really doesn’t leave much else apart from yeast and that in fact I think is the key, traditional British beers, even though they are fairly ubiquitous are exceptional because the main character building ingredient is the yeast....
when I started at Thornbridge we used a yeast strain that came from Holt’s brewery in Manchester, not the sexiest brewery in the UK and certainly not a hop forward US style brewery but the yeast is fantastic and Thornbridge took the UK beer industry by storm with a range of expressive US style hop driven beers. I left Thornbridge and became the Head Brewer at Buxton, I quickly ditched the yeast Buxton were using and put in place the same strain brewing some excellent beers. This strainis[was but no more??] also used by Brewdog for Punk IPA and Jackhammer and adds to the character in amazing ways...
yeast isn’t just there to do a job it’s a crucial part of flavour and aroma complexity, a lot of my experimental brewing involves split batch fermented beer to compare and contrast the impact that a yeast strain has on the finished beer and the results are astonishing.
Interesting, thanks.Well the Fulller's partigyle is an obvious one, at ~7.2% light crystal, but that's certainly up at the higher end. I suspect Hobgoblin may be even higher but then that's the Thames Valley for you, at one extreme. OTOH, it's just as normal for British bitter to have no crystal at all. So yeah, US brewers tend to put way too much crystal and would be much better heading for an average of say 3%, or balancing out a bit more with invert, but it's not the only thing that goes wrong with US bitter.
Anyway, I talked a bit about yeast for bitter over on THBF, and it's worth repeating here the quotes from the two co-founders of Cloudwater. For those that don't know Cloudwater is arguably the leading modern brewery in the UK, at one point Ratebeer put them #2 in the world behind Hill Farmstead, so ahead of Trillium, Treehouse, Other Half etc. So Cloudwater know their stuff. They do not use S-04 and Notty for their bitters...
Paul Jones is quoted in a great new article from Jeff Alworth on modern bitter, and an accompanying blog :
https://beerandbrewing.com/style-school-cask-bitter/
https://www.beervanablog.com/beervana/2025/4/7/the-evolution-of-cask-bitter
“Yeast is by far the most important ingredient in bitter,” says Paul Jones, cofounder of the Manchester-based brewery Cloudwater. After all, house yeasts are what made those legacy bitters distinctive. “It’s what makes someone a fan of J.W. Lees, but not so much of Holt’s, or a fan of Holt’s but not so much Harvey’s.
James Kemp used to blog at Port 66 :
https://web.archive.org/web/2018041...co.uk/yeast-brewing-myths-ideal-house-strain/
what is it about [trad bitter] that makes them so interesting and amazing? I’d thought for a while that it was malt character and quality and especially malt complexity that help create such an interesting beer at a modest abv. This was certainly a tack I tried to take when I was brewing commercially but when you look at these beers and their recipes you’ll find them to be simple and very much the same....This really doesn’t leave much else apart from yeast and that in fact I think is the key, traditional British beers, even though they are fairly ubiquitous are exceptional because the main character building ingredient is the yeast....
when I started at Thornbridge we used a yeast strain that came from Holt’s brewery in Manchester, not the sexiest brewery in the UK and certainly not a hop forward US style brewery but the yeast is fantastic and Thornbridge took the UK beer industry by storm with a range of expressive US style hop driven beers. I left Thornbridge and became the Head Brewer at Buxton, I quickly ditched the yeast Buxton were using and put in place the same strain brewing some excellent beers. This strainis[was but no more??] also used by Brewdog for Punk IPA and Jackhammer and adds to the character in amazing ways...
yeast isn’t just there to do a job it’s a crucial part of flavour and aroma complexity, a lot of my experimental brewing involves split batch fermented beer to compare and contrast the impact that a yeast strain has on the finished beer and the results are astonishing.
Cloudwater became big news very quickly with James Campbell as head brewer, he only stayed a couple of years and their profile has dropped somewhat since. It is primarily an American style craft brewer, of course.Interesting, thanks.
Funny side fact: Cloudwater happens to be the only brewery that managed to show me diacetyl in one of their beers. A lager that tasted like liquid butter.
All their other beers were fine tbh. But that one forever made them the "pop corn brewery" in my mind.
By any chance, do you know which yeast he is referring to? Or to rephrase it more appropriately, do you know which yeast one could buy to get close to the one he is using?
I agree with that sentiment entirely. Bunch of elfin bankers!CAMRA will look down their noses at me, but they don't drink my beers, so they can piss off.
That's interesting. Why does this Ince guy think English hops are terrible? They're amazing. I've stopped ordering US and Pacific hops to give a bit of time to English and French hops. Harlequin is a splendid hop that can easily knock the socks off anything coming over the oceans. Phoenix is unique. Challenge, Bramling X, and WGV even can be an eye opener in the right beer.When I chatted to Joe Ince the person I was with asked him why he doesn't use English hops he said "because they are terrible." I said that's a matter of opinion, because my preference is for English hops in cask ales, and things got tense!
We all want cask to survive and thrive, but some of us are also very keen for English hops to survive and thrive too. It's getting harder to find cask ales that are import free. A lot harder. At one point around ten years ago it seemed as if exports to the US might keep English hops growers in business, but that avenue seems to have narrowed a fair bit?
He just hates them. I just pointed out a lot of people like them. He is an excellent brewer though, I drink a lot of his stuff!That's interesting. Why does this Ince guy think English hops are terrible? They're amazing. I've stopped ordering US and Pacific hops to give a bit of time to English and French hops. Harlequin is a splendid hop that can easily knock the socks off anything coming over the oceans. Phoenix is unique. Challenge, Bramling X, and WGV even can be an eye opener in the right beer.
Perhaps this Ince fellow just can't be with them.
Fair 'nuff.He just hates them. I just pointed out a lot of people like them. He is an excellent brewer though, I drink a lot of his stuff!
If bottle conditioned beer classes as real ale due to its natural carbonation, then naturally conditioned keg beer should also qualify as real ale, surely?As for CAMRA's notion of "real ale in a bottle", we'll that's another story.
I'd go along with that except that I wonder about their reluctance to approve using cask breathers. It makes me think that the process of oxidation through aeration should have already started. A bit like letting a wine "breathe". But that would start in the glass anyway.If bottle conditioned beer classes as real ale due to its natural carbonation, then naturally conditioned keg beer should also qualify as real ale, surely?
I just think the word 'keg' had satanic overtones for Camra, for a very long time, and possibly still has for some of them.
Although they have approved cask breathers obviously.I'd go along with that except that I wonder about their reluctance to approve using cask breathers. It makes me think that the process of oxidation through aeration should have already started. A bit like letting a wine "breathe". But that would start in the glass anyway.
Yes. I've now convinced myself that I'm over thinking this and they probably had a holy horror of CO2 bottles. A bit of a contradicting for a pressure group.
I'll stick with the Beer From The Wood lot, even if the only two pints I ever had from the wood were pretty poor.![]()
Cor, I missed that. A very risky statement! My next brew, still in planning ...Never go below 90% Pale Malt, make the rest up as you please.