dyqik
Well-Known Member
It did hurt our ancestors, quite severely. We know that now. The average life expectancy at birth was once about 40 (in and after 1850 in the US), and people struggled with debilitating illnesses far more than today. Admittedly, infant and childbirth deaths lowered the life expectancy a lot, but this was before cancer was understood, before the germ theory of disease was understood sufficiently to allow protection, and before the impact of environmental hazards like tobacco smoke, coal smoke, etc. was understood.Not reading the full 6 pages.........but........imo....no one said anything about this stuff before there was political regulations, and were all here, so it never hurt our ancestors, so why be so upset about it?
It wasn't that long ago that people used to retire at 65 or earlier due to illness, and be dead on average a year or two later (the Social Security model was built on this, and needs updating in one way or another). Smoking wasn't all or even much of that - other disease, environmental exposures and workplace hazards killed people before smoking could. But then we got better at dealing with those other hazards, so smoking rose up the actuarial tables.