TNGabe
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 19, 2012
- Messages
- 6,657
- Reaction score
- 2,295
I suppose that I can see that. I know many artisanal wines, beers, cheeses, etc. have locally protected names and we homebrewers can't (and shouldn't) use those names.
But, at the same time, I wouldn't want to belittle someone trying to explore the style, even using limited means. You may not formally call the product a lambic, but calling it "lame-bic" seems demeaning to the effort. The problem really is that many folks read "lambic" as a generic name of a style, like "stout" or "pale ale", not as "an artisanal sour beer wild fermented in the Lambeek region of Belgium".
Maybe calling a homebrewer's effort "sour beer modeled on the Lambic brewing style" would be more appropriate?
I call it lamebic because it's funny. If someone feels belittled by that, they probably have bigger problems with insecurity and/or being humorless. I think lambic is defined by process, not geography. You can't make lambic without a coolship and barrels anymore than you can make a lager that isn't lagered. If Jean Van Roy thinks Beatification and Allagash's coolship beers are lambic, that's good enough for me.