After reading a previous thread, I have a few questions about starters. Some of you may call me a sinner after reading some of the things I say, but I've been happily brewing for 4 or 5 years, extract plus partial mash, and have been very satisfied with my results. That being said, here we go.
I've done a few batches with starters, for various reasons, no problem. However, I've made a large number of batches without, also no problem, using "smack packs". I used to measure final gravity, and always came up a little short, but found that I actually like my ales (all I make due to lagering constraits) on the malty side. I always ferment in a carboy, and realized I didn't have to take gravity readings to know whether or not fermentation was done, I only needed to observe. I also rarely use "clean" yeasts (Wyeast 1056 for example), because I like the complexity from the others. Which leads to my first question.
Why would not making a starter diminish the attributes of a specific yeast?
When I did make a starter, made with light extract, I chucked in the whole starter, not just the yeast. After all, I was fermenting the basis of my beer anyhow. It's not like I was using jujubee fruit. This leads to my second question.
Why waste my time seperating the yeast when it's easier to dump the whole thing in?
I only raise these questions for one reason. I appreciate the science behind brewing, and love the fact that many are so pure and concise about technique, but I wonder how many people are scared away from brewing because of that. Making beer is easy, making good beer is not hard. Once you learn the basics, keep learning.
I've done a few batches with starters, for various reasons, no problem. However, I've made a large number of batches without, also no problem, using "smack packs". I used to measure final gravity, and always came up a little short, but found that I actually like my ales (all I make due to lagering constraits) on the malty side. I always ferment in a carboy, and realized I didn't have to take gravity readings to know whether or not fermentation was done, I only needed to observe. I also rarely use "clean" yeasts (Wyeast 1056 for example), because I like the complexity from the others. Which leads to my first question.
Why would not making a starter diminish the attributes of a specific yeast?
When I did make a starter, made with light extract, I chucked in the whole starter, not just the yeast. After all, I was fermenting the basis of my beer anyhow. It's not like I was using jujubee fruit. This leads to my second question.
Why waste my time seperating the yeast when it's easier to dump the whole thing in?
I only raise these questions for one reason. I appreciate the science behind brewing, and love the fact that many are so pure and concise about technique, but I wonder how many people are scared away from brewing because of that. Making beer is easy, making good beer is not hard. Once you learn the basics, keep learning.