First time on this...hope this works. I think 2qts./lb is a very thin mash. The result is that you have so much water in there, that very little (only 2 gals.) of sprage water are used. Spage water should be in the 168 to 170 degree range, BTW. But back to the subject... sparging, or lack thereof, is where you get your effiency increases or decreases. For some, i.e., batch spagers, efficiency is not that important, but for some... it's important. What is most important, however, is that you can predict and hit your target efficiencies or your O.G. is off, sometimes way off. Now, back to the subject at hand [again]... Sparging rinses the converted sugars (from starches) from the mash/grainbed into solution (wort) to the boil kettle. The more sparge water (and sparging), the greater the efficiency. Two gals. of sparge water is way too low (IMHO) for the good efficiency you seek. I used to use 1.3 qts./lb all the time and do a mashout with direct heatng (no bolilng water additions) and got good and predictable effciencies ant hit target O.G. like a champ. Then, I got away from mashout and used variable mash thicknesses, with boling water additions to mimic a mashout (168 degrees) and my effciencies were all over and my targets O.G's started to be missed as well. Other than the mash thickness variable, the other obvious variable was the amount of sparge water and sparging required. Thinner mashes don't need as much. So, if you want better efficiencies go with thicker mashes and more sparging. Sparging (fly or continuous) is not the Holy Grail, however , and batch spargers would/might argue against it. It has limits. One should not sparge past 1.013 or 1.015 as a rule, or you risk astringency. Hope this helps.