• Please visit and share your knowledge at our sister communities:
  • If you have not, please join our official Homebrewing Facebook Group!

    Homebrewing Facebook Group

How to Distill (book like how to brew...)

Homebrew Talk

Help Support Homebrew Talk:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
I think TGVF's post is meant to suggest that if you add amylase you can increase the ABV because the enzymes will convert the starches in beer to fermentable sugar but if you are using malted barley and creating a mash then all the grains in the mash will be subject to amylase enzymes from the malting and so you are not going to increase the ABV by adding more enzymes. The only way to increase the ABV is to add more grains at the beginning or add more fermentable sugars to the wort. But TGFV needs to remember that the choice of yeast will determine the tolerance the yeast has for alcohol and achieving a fermentable solution with a potential ABV of greater than about 15% (an SG of about 1.120) is a challenge for most yeast, not impossible, but a challenge- and a challenge where flavor is the first to go.

Not sure what you are trying to say in the red highlighted statement. "Amylase" is too generic of a term to mean much in this context. Adding alpha amylase or beta amylase to the mash or fermenter won't do much unless the grain bill had low diastatic power (not enough enzymes), or the mash time was too short to reduce all of the carbohydrates to fermentable sugar and limit dextrins. Assuming you had good diastatic power, and you mashed long enough to get limit dextrins and fermentable sugar, adding amyloglucosidase (glucoamylase, gluco) to the mash or fermenter will turn the limit dextrins into fermentable sugar. This will create more fermentable sugar from the same amount of grain. If done correctly, doesn't matter much whether it's added to the mash or fermenter, but fermenter is more tolerant from a processing perspective (you don't have to worry about denaturing the gluco.) Adding gluco to the fermenter has the added benefit of completing saccharification that could have been done in the mash, but didn't happen due to too short a mash or enzyme denaturing.

The yeast choice will have a large effect on the esters and other flavor compounds created during fermentation. ABV above the yeast's tolerance is likely to create more flavor compounds rather than less, and some may be unpleasant. How much of these flavor compounds end up in the distillate will depend on the volatility and thermal stability of the individual compounds, and the distilling process. I don't see how any of the preceding leads to use of gluco reducing flavor in the distillate.

Brew on :mug:
 
My comment about the reduction of flavours comes from the higher abv of the wash in and of itself results in a less flavourful distilled product.

I'm not sure the exact science of it, but it's regular mentioned and the science is broken down on the homedistiller site for higher vs lower abv washes.

That being said, if the difference is between 8 and 10 percent, I doubt the flavour will be effected, usually they are talking between 8 and 16% washes.
 
My comment about the reduction of flavours comes from the higher abv of the wash in and of itself results in a less flavourful distilled product.

I'm not sure the exact science of it, but it's regular mentioned and the science is broken down on the homedistiller site for higher vs lower abv washes.

That being said, if the difference is between 8 and 10 percent, I doubt the flavour will be effected, usually they are talking between 8 and 16% washes.
That sounds plausible if the high ABV wash has a lot of added sugar vs. the low ABV wash which is all grain. Would the same hold if both washes were free of added sugar? But, this is altogether a different case than using enzyme to convert remaining dextrins from an all grain mash to fermentable sugar.

Brew on :mug:
 

Latest posts

Back
Top