ChickenHops
Well-Known Member
I've made several beers that I thought were ruined. Then I tried them several weeks to a month later and found them to be much improved.
In 40 some batches I've only had one that I feel I ruined. It was my second batch of all grain. I took a gravity reading prior to the boil. In my haste I forgot to adjust for temp and volume and thought my efficiency was horrible. So I added extract to the boil. The OG ended up being way high.
The ABV ended up being over 8%. OK for an IPA maybe. But this was a California Common. It wasn't completely ruined. It was just terrible compared to an earlier extract version of a Common, which had been excellent. It took me 7 months to drink all of the ruined Common. Then only because I ran out of other beers to drink.
In 40 some batches I've only had one that I feel I ruined. It was my second batch of all grain. I took a gravity reading prior to the boil. In my haste I forgot to adjust for temp and volume and thought my efficiency was horrible. So I added extract to the boil. The OG ended up being way high.
The ABV ended up being over 8%. OK for an IPA maybe. But this was a California Common. It wasn't completely ruined. It was just terrible compared to an earlier extract version of a Common, which had been excellent. It took me 7 months to drink all of the ruined Common. Then only because I ran out of other beers to drink.