Your mistake is that you assume he is arguing in good faith.
The LODO crowd, it seems to me, believe reducing oxidation leads to a) better stability and b) subjectively, better taste.
His argument now, as it's changed a bit over the course of this thread, is that long term stability isn't important to a homebrewer, and that taste is subjective. So although he is arguing with everyone in this tread, he doesn't actually dispute what the LODO folk are saying.
He merely disagrees whether one of the two "benefits" is an important goal for homebrewers while ignoring the other. Of course he probably agrees that better tasting beer is an important goal. But he dismisses it as subjective and unprovable, which, duh.
Unfortunately, that is how every one of these discussions goes.