• Please visit and share your knowledge at our sister communities:
  • If you have not, please join our official Homebrewing Facebook Group!

    Homebrewing Facebook Group

Holy Moley Yeast is Expensive!!

Homebrew Talk

Help Support Homebrew Talk:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

pbowler

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 31, 2006
Messages
284
Reaction score
1
Location
Motown
9 lb's assorted .99/lb $8.81
2 oz Hops @ $1.25 = $2.50
1 Wyeast Irish Ale Yeast smack Pack $7 freakin dollars.

the yeast is almost half the freakin cost?!?!


Thats it, I now have some Lager yeast from the pilsner still in the Secondary (not too late is it?)

the bottom of the Hogaarden that I saved, and this Irish ale yeast

Time to start searching the board for how to harvest yeast.

I'm searching as you read this, but feel free to point me in the right Direction.
 
my local hbs only has dry yeast so when i want liquid it is $8.95 canadian and
$11.70 ups shipping:eek:
i make sure i need more than yeast when i place an on-line order
 
Thats why Ive been using dry yeast a majority of the time now. Anybody think the variety of dry yeast will eventually catch up with the liquid?
 
I started (many years ago) with cheap dry yeast - coopers, etc. that came with kits.

When I got serious, I switched to liquid yeasts. My beer improved.

Lately, (last 10 or so batches) I have switched back to dry yeast because I was getting really sick of spending so much $$$ on yeast. I have used the quality dried yeast like Nottingham and Safale. My beer has improved again.

I like dried yeast a lot better because it is cheaper and you get so many more cells in the packet.

Now, I only use liquid yeast for specialty brews. A belgian is simply not a belgian without a belgian yeast.
 
By the way. Last Thursday, I brewed an Oatmeal Stout with the Nottingham yeast - stuff fermented out in about 2 days. I racked it to secondary last night - clean and clear!

Last night, I also pitched a pale ale onto that same yeast cake at about 8 pm. It was fermenting in about 30 minutes. This morning, it was going balistic - I will guess that it has fermented out by the time I get home today (1 pm).

That stuff is seriously amazing. Like the Cali-Ale strain (1056), it is a clean flavor, high floccing yeast. I don't think that I have been impressed with a yeast as much as this one. My only complaint is that its taste may be too neutral, but that is what I want in much of my session beers.
 
Pbowler:

Your financial analysis of the cost of making a batch of homebrew seems correct. I would suggest, as someone else has here, that you collect your new yeast from your first brew and use it again for about 3-4 times. That way you spread the cost of the smack pack over more batches of beer and your cost goes to $2.00 per batch or less. I collect the yeast and trub out of my primary fermentor(bucket) after each brew and store it in a frig until I need it. I collect it in a sanitized plastic container with a screw top lid. I store it in the frig with the lid on loosely for CO2 escape. When it comes time to use it, I add about a cup or so of sterile water (water boiled in a covered pan on the stove for 15 minutes and then cooled), swirl, let sit for about 2 minutes or so and pour the liguid off the settled trub into my sanitized jar I use to prepare a yeast starter. I then add sterile wort to the yeast and add an air lock and let sit for a day or so until I brew. You will find that reused yeast from such a starter begins fermenting in fresh wort much quicker than the original smack pack. This is because you are adding a much larger amount of yeast to the volume of wort, or in brewing terms, you have increased your pitching rate. I only use my yeast 3-4 times because 2 things begin happening when you reuse yeast. One is they change slowly by adapting to the environment or the beers they have been in as well as mutate (genetic adaptation). Second, along with your yeast, there are some bacteria along for the ride as we do not work under sterile conditions as home brewers. Thus, it is best if you buy new yeast after about 4 bactches to start fresh. I usually only want about 4 batches of a given style of beer and want to change yeast anyways.

One other comment, if you look at the time, effort and cost of producing and supplying liquid pure strain yeast, the $7.00 is actually a very fair price. If you decide to propagate your own yeast, you will need a large pressure cooker to sterilize things, test tubes, dry malt extract, agar, other lab glassware, etc, not counting your time. You will have to buy a lot of yeast to equal the cost of propagating your own. Price it out and see.

Just my 2 cents.


Dr Malt
 
So the yeast left over in the Secondary is what you pitch on to or the yeast from the primary?

and so you filter your wort?

how do you seperate the yeast from the rest of that crap in the trub?
 
Chimone said:
Thats why Ive been using dry yeast a majority of the time now. Anybody think the variety of dry yeast will eventually catch up with the liquid?

I think eventually it will get there.

I use safale 56 in about 85% of my recipes. I like it better than liquid--mainly because if you don't have time for a starter, you can pitch 2 packs of dry for half the cost, and still have more yeast cells than if you did a starter anyway.

I also keep a packet around for an occasional stuck ferment.
 
I too am dismayed by the high price of liquid. That, coupled with the fact that I have no local HBS, and summertime temps are not kind to liquid yeast on a UPS truck for several days making the journey from Texas to Virginia, led me to use dry yeasts on almost every one of my first 12 batches (the exception was a wit that my friend cultured the yeast from a bottle of Legend (Richmond) wit). However, I have noticed that, while using dry yeast, it seems like there is a certain complexity that is lacking in many of my beers---especially the ones that are true to style and don't use any crazy adjuncts. So, given that the temps have started to fall, I ordered some Wyeast smackpacks from Austin and fermented my first batch (Dunkelweizen) with purchased liquid.

Even though there's still airlock activity, I already notice a difference. What might that be? Well, when you walk into my fermentation room, the whole room smells like ripe bananas---just like a great bavarian wiessebier! That comes from the yeasts, baby, that German Wheat Wyeast 3333 strain. Given that, prior to brewing, I was already a beer nerd/connoisseur, and have become accustomed to complex, character-filled beers, I don't think I can linger in dry-yeast-land anymore. So much of beer is the complexity offered by the yeast strain, and generic dry strains just don't do well enough. And even though it's not even done fermenting, the fact that my fermentation room smells like bananas is proof enough for me.

Yes, they're expensive, but I think, when this one is done, I'm going to clean and harvest the yeast for another wheat beer...perhaps an apricot hefe. If you can get 3 uses out of a $7 smackpack, then you bring your costs down to equal the dry packs. :ban:
 
Dude said:
I use safale 56 in about 85% of my recipes. I like it better than liquid--mainly because if you don't have time for a starter, you can pitch 2 packs of dry for half the cost, and still have more yeast cells than if you did a starter anyway.
I also keep a packet around for an occasional stuck ferment.

This is me too, though I have also used s-04 as well. I have been happy. I have only used liquid in instances where I buy a kit, but most of my brews are made up recipes. I also keep a pack on standby.
 
Too fast for me Dr. malt.

Excellent post thanks.

a few Questions:

1.when you say pour the liquid off the settled trub, is this then the yeast for a starter? when then of the Settled Trub, discard it?

2. where do you come by the sterile Wort you use for a starter? is this a small DME + Water mix you keep for this sole purpose? Can you store this sterile Wort?

This is exactly what I was after, thanks a ton. I certainly have no intentions of pressure cooking anything, i have enough work as it is.

thanks again!
 
pbowler said:
Too fast for me Dr. malt.

Excellent post thanks.

a few Questions:

1.when you say pour the liquid off the settled trub, is this then the yeast for a starter? when then of the Settled Trub, discard it?

2. where do you come by the sterile Wort you use for a starter? is this a small DME + Water mix you keep for this sole purpose? Can you store this sterile Wort?

This is exactly what I was after, thanks a ton. I certainly have no intentions of pressure cooking anything, i have enough work as it is.

thanks again!
1. You can discard the settled trub. It will separate again and the yeast will settle on the bottom of the container.

2. You can make a starter with DME to a solution of about 1.040 for a starter. Boil it for 15 minutes and cool it to around 70 or so and do this a couple of days before brewing.
 
Anybody think the variety of dry yeast will eventually catch up with the liquid?

I doubt it. Most ale and lager yeasts cannot tolerate being dried and most of the dried strains have been around for decades. I did see a new dried Belgian yeast just last month. The number of dried yeasts will increase, but liquid yeasts will always have a wider range.
 
Blender said:
1. You can discard the settled trub. It will separate again and the yeast will settle on the bottom of the container.

This is one reason that you have to be a bit careful using this method. If you are always collecting those cells that are on the bottom, you are collecting the highest flocculating cells in the entire bunch. As you use the yeast a 3rd or 4th time, they will have mutated into a higher floccing yeast strain. You may not get the attenuation you had in the first batch because you are using only those cells that flocc out the best.

I am sure that after just a few generations, the mutation is minimal. However, if your last few beers from a given strain don't get you the FG's you are looking for, this is why.

Just a thought to consider.
 
pbowler said:
So the yeast left over in the Secondary is what you pitch on to or the yeast from the primary?

and so you filter your wort?

how do you seperate the yeast from the rest of that crap in the trub?

Primary. And if you're not going to go through the wash and save for another day approach (read other posts), you just toss it on "all the crap". It'll probably finish in 2-3 days tops and I always rack as soon as it settles out to get it off all that trub. About guaranteed you'll need a blow-off as well.
 
sonvolt said:
This is one reason that you have to be a bit careful using this method. If you are always collecting those cells that are on the bottom, you are collecting the highest flocculating cells in the entire bunch. As you use the yeast a 3rd or 4th time, they will have mutated into a higher floccing yeast strain. You may not get the attenuation you had in the first batch because you are using only those cells that flocc out the best.

I am sure that after just a few generations, the mutation is minimal. However, if your last few beers from a given strain don't get you the FG's you are looking for, this is why.

Just a thought to consider.

Ah yes, they were talking about a similar thing on The Brewing Network a few weeks back. If you reuse the trub from the secondary it will be cleaner (less hop matter and break materials) but the yeast will be less floccuant and more attenuative (they hung in there longer - thats why there in the secondary). I wonder if a brewer alternated harvesting from the primary and secondary on subsequent pitchings of the same yeast if the characteristics would be less modified...
 
Try a "Burton Union" for harvesting yeast. There is a good DIY design iarticle n September 2006 BYO magazine.
 
I used to worry about the cost of liquid yeast. But now, I figure:

1. It's no more than a six pack of good beer
2. I get at least 3 uses out of a pack, so it only works out to a couple bucks each.
 
Chimone said:
Thats why Ive been using dry yeast a majority of the time now. Anybody think the variety of dry yeast will eventually catch up with the liquid?

Well... if it's any indication... when I started around 91 or so... the dry yeast was basicly the same as it is now... not very comforting is it :)
 
pbowler said:
9 lb's assorted .99/lb $8.81
2 oz Hops @ $1.25 = $2.50
1 Wyeast Irish Ale Yeast smack Pack $7 freakin dollars.

the yeast is almost half the freakin cost?!?!


Thats it, I now have some Lager yeast from the pilsner still in the Secondary (not too late is it?)

the bottom of the Hogaarden that I saved, and this Irish ale yeast

Time to start searching the board for how to harvest yeast.

I'm searching as you read this, but feel free to point me in the right Direction.

Ok, just to put this in perspective...
assuming a 5 gallon batch:
Total cost = $18.31
cost per ounce of beer = $0.028609375
cost per 12 ounce bottle of beer = $0.3433125
cost per 6-pack of beer= $2.059875
hmmm... I don't think you can buy a sixer of BudMillerCoors for that, can ya???

I say use it two or three times if you want to brew a batch that falls into the same yeast strain (I often go months without using the same strain twice)... all in all it really isn't that much... just over a penny per ounce of beer per vial/smack pack of yeast

just my 1 oz worth
:D

later,
mikey
 
Evan! said:
I too am dismayed by the high price of liquid. That, coupled with the fact that I have no local HBS, and summertime temps are not kind to liquid yeast on a UPS truck for several days making the journey from Texas to Virginia, led me to use dry yeasts on almost every one of my first 12 batches (the exception was a wit that my friend cultured the yeast from a bottle of Legend (Richmond) wit). However, I have noticed that, while using dry yeast, it seems like there is a certain complexity that is lacking in many of my beers---especially the ones that are true to style and don't use any crazy adjuncts. So, given that the temps have started to fall, I ordered some Wyeast smackpacks from Austin and fermented my first batch (Dunkelweizen) with purchased liquid.

Even though there's still airlock activity, I already notice a difference. What might that be? Well, when you walk into my fermentation room, the whole room smells like ripe bananas---just like a great bavarian wiessebier! That comes from the yeasts, baby, that German Wheat Wyeast 3333 strain. Given that, prior to brewing, I was already a beer nerd/connoisseur, and have become accustomed to complex, character-filled beers, I don't think I can linger in dry-yeast-land anymore. So much of beer is the complexity offered by the yeast strain, and generic dry strains just don't do well enough. And even though it's not even done fermenting, the fact that my fermentation room smells like bananas is proof enough for me.

Yes, they're expensive, but I think, when this one is done, I'm going to clean and harvest the yeast for another wheat beer...perhaps an apricot hefe. If you can get 3 uses out of a $7 smackpack, then you bring your costs down to equal the dry packs. :ban:
I used a generic yeast for my first two wheat beers, the second of which turned out GREAT. The first was a watery, Bud Light tasting disapointment (poor mash efficiency). I then used Wyeast's Hefeweizen #3638 for my third wheat... using the same ingredients and painstakingly similar process to my GREAT second batch. That wheat beer ended up tasting like each glass (I keg) had about 6 orange slices in it. Overpowering fruit flavor! My coworkers and I still drank every last drop, of course.

Anyone else used this particular Wyeast before? Did you experience the same citrus flavors?
 
Here's what I do - I haven't bought yeast (except for new strains) in a year:

Take one pitchable tube of liquid yeast - make beer. From the primary harvest slurry into a couple of mason jars (sanitized please). I can easily fill two pint jars w/slurry. Store in fridge. (To actually harvest the yeast pour ~6-8 ounces of distilled H20 into carboy after you have racked beer, swirl it around to mix in the slurry & pour into jars through santizied funnel - wipe lip of jars & carboy w/alcohol to sanitize those to before pouring - simple.)

For my next batches I take a sanitary spoon & take a couple scoops of slurry from my mason jars - make a starter with those scoops & pitch into new batch.

I continue this process until I run out of the slurry from the original mason jars (generation 2) - on the last of those I reharvest the yeast from the primary and repeat the whole process - now I have two jars of generation 3 yeast. Repeat again. I have gone up to 4 generations without seeing any differences at all.

This method gets 25 uses or so (2 jars each generation w/3 uses per jar). If you harvest from every batch, instead of when your runout you can get 250 or so uses from one tube if you go through 4 generations. (1200 uses through 5 generations).

It takes an extra 5 minutes when racking from primary to secondary to do this. (I always make starters anyway - so no extra time taken there either...)
 
My LHBS sells White Labs vials for $5.95, but they have a small section of the fridge for yeast past the "best by" date and they knock $1 off the price. The most I've got one past the date is about a month and a half. I just make sure to do a starter and it's ready to go. Combine that with reusing yeast and that's considerable savings.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top