that's the thing though... it's hard to describe what it is... there certainly is something distinct. That's the problem with categorizing or labeling... all we know is what we think a brewery's beers taste like... and if we find a similarity we try to label it... rustic? farmhouse? saison? funk?
at the end of the day... we (and by we, I mean the entire beer world not us per se as many of us already do) will need to start just recognizing beers on their own or breweries on their own and not about a style or category
I'm not quite ready to toss out all stylistic descriptors just yet. As a consumer, I think it's useful to have a better sense of what I buy before I buy it... especially if I haven't had enough of a brewery's offerings to know what is distinctive about them--or if there IS anything distinctive about them. If a brewery--even one with a distinctive taste--only labeled their beer as "Acme Brewery Ale, 9% ABV," I wouldn't be able to know if I was buying a malty, sweeter barleywine-type beer or a drier, hoppier imperial pale ale.
I am all for using meaningful descriptive adjectives, knowing even those are subjective in nature. Also, breweries could adopt a kind of information panel that lists vital statistics like ABV, OG, FG, IBU, color, yeast strains, etc. Of course, some of these are potentially proprietary in nature, but the more information provided, the less categorical descriptors are needed.
I definitely hear your point, though, Os, about resisting the urge to place everything into neat boxes--especially when so many (most!) beers are not definitively categorizable.