All your math looks good, except for the conversion eff calculation. Your conversion efficiency should have been:Make sure I am right here. Still not sure I achevied the results I am looking for.
1. 14lbs of grain * 1.038- 1 = 532 pts
2. 532 / 5 gallons = 106.4 / 1000 = .1064 = 1.1064 ( is this correct?)
3. 1.1064 = 24.82 plato
4. 1.106 x 8.329 lbs/gal * 5 gallons= 46.076 lbs of wort
5. 46.076 * 24.82 wt% sugar= 11.43 lbs of sugar @ 100% conversion
Strike water weight
1. 18.06 / 4 * 8.329= 37.605
Max Plato = 100% * 11.43 / (11.43 + 37.605) = 23.3
23.3 plato= 1.096 Max SG
Conversion efficiency= 1.090 ( actual measured first runnings) / 1.096= 99.45% conversion efficiency!!!!! Boooo Yah!!!!
I mashed for 90 minutes instead of my normal 60. Seemed to make the difference. But hold on ..
pre boil volume of 6.75 gallons.
pre boil gravity of 1.046 = 310 pts into the BK
mash efficiency= 310 / 532= 58.36 conversion efficency
lauter efficiency= 58.36 / 99.45 = 58.68
So this data now tells us that my problem is in my lautering, or sparging process. I think I may revert back to a batch sparge on my next brew and see if I see positive results.
Let me know if you see any inaccuracies in my calculations. Thank you so much for all of this help!
Ingredients:
------------
Amt Name Type # %/IBU
9 lbs Wheat Malt, Ger (2.0 SRM) Grain 1 64.3 %
5 lbs Pilsner (2 Row) Ger (2.0 SRM) Grain 2 35.7 %
0.75 oz Hallertauer [4.80 %] - Boil 45.0 min Hop 3 10.5 IBUs
0.25 oz Hallertauer [4.80 %] - Boil 15.0 min Hop 4 1.9 IBUs
1.0 pkg Weihenstephan Weizen (Wyeast Labs #3068) Yeast 5 -
Mash Schedule: Single Infusion, Light Body, No Mash Out
Total Grain Weight: 14 lbs
----------------------------
Name Description Step Temperature Step Time
Mash In Add 18.06 qt of water at 165.4 F 150.0 F 90 min
Sparge: Fly sparge with 4.40 gal water at 168.0 F
Notes:
------
Created with BeerSmith 2 - http://www.beersmith.com
(1.090 - 1) / (1.096 - 1) = 0.9375 => 93.75%
In that case your lauter efficiency would be:0.5836 / 0.9375 = 0.6225 => 62.25%
Still nothing to write home about.How long did your sparge take? Unless you did a very fast sparge, my best guess for the low lauter eff is that you somehow got significant channeling during the sparge.
Trying a batch sparge to compare is a good idea. In that case you should increase your strike water and reduce the sparge water to get equal volume for the first runnings and sparge runnings (as that gives you the theoretical maximum efficiency.) I calculated your grain absorption as 2.165 gal or 0.1546 gal/lb. You want 6.75 / 2 = 3.375 gal in each running, so strike water would be 3.375 + 2.165 = 5.54 gal and sparge water 3.375 gal.
Brew on
