Been forever for me also. Truly, Im more a "close enough" guy then a true cloner. Grassy Heady sounds gross. Contract Brewer there??
I'm not that technical. I use PS to guard against post fermentation diacetyl. Dry Hop-1 is after day 3 fermentation. As mentioned, "Dry-Hop"-2 is hop steeping and directly added to the keg. After doing this, 1000% improvement with my IPAs. Luckily I have hop head friends who helped with critiques. Everyone has they're own set-up, tastes and ways of doing things but this works for my personal goals.
Cool, why didn't I think of that. This could really help some of my friends who insist on dry hopping at warm temps and who often have some diacetyl. So, I could advise them to ferment out their beers and then add PS and dry hop. How much PS do you need to add? Do you dissolve it in some water and add it with the dry hops and swirl?
Im actually going to brew this again this weekend. The recipe i posted is very close. Aiming for 1.072 post boil so it finishes at 8%.Brewing this version this coming weekend with Imperial Barbarian. My only concern is the sugar and the low mash temp. This thing has to finish bone dry based on this recipe. What was the final gravity?? Also single dryhop after fermentation is complete?
So, if I'm reading this right, you are adding 1 TBS of potassium sorbate at secondary transfer (into a keg with dry hopped and sanitized water ) with CO2 to inhibit oxygen introduction diacetyl? I brewed a clone of this last Sunday and I'm on day 3 of fermentation, so dry hop time is approaching.Myself, and most anyone else that uses fruit in secondary, uses potassium sorbate to put any remaining yeast asleep so that no more fermentation occurs. Just as critical is a cold crash to drop out the yeast in the first place. I started using with my hard lemonades. However as I began to pursue hazy IPAs with massive secondary, I, and many others, would get post fermentation diacetyl. I started using it in beer along with the technique described.
As far as ascorbic acid, aka "Vitamin C", it's already a well known food preserver. Just Google it, you'll get all the info you need.
Sounds awesome! The original has no pineapple to my recollection of how I perceived it. I haven't had it in way too long though.Here is my pre carbed Clone OG was 1.072, FG 1.006. pine, pineapple, citrus and a bitter finish. Pretty good, though I've never had the real thing.View attachment 733860
So the neighbor tried my clone. He says it's more bitter in the finish that HT, but the body and initial flavor is spot on, as well as the aroma. He also noted it went directly to his head like HT. So I would probably move some of the bittering hop to flameout.After carbing and letting it settle it has a big pine with a soft citrus and maybe stone fruit. Very nice sweetness followed by sharp bitterness. We'll see what the Vermonter has to say.
Just drank 4 4 packs in a week after a lovely trip to Stowe. They all tasted great. I've had a few 4 packs which were distributed to CT earlier in the year that I was NOT a fan of. Something clearly off. Maybe the same batch you had.Alchemist beers are dry hopped once post fermentation at temps close to 45. I believe Heady/Focal are only 1.5#/bbl DH. That being said I haven’t had a good can of either in so long. Latest cans I had were Total grass bombs. Undrinkable for me honestly, which bums me out.
I just kegged batch. Definitely not a Heady topper. I finished too low at 1.010. s/b 1.012.Here is the recipe I have been using. I think I nailed it!
Fermentables:
15 lbs Pearl base malt (86%)
0.6 lb Cara malt (Crystal 10) (4%)
1.75 lb Corn sugar (10%)
Water profile
CA: 50 ppm
So4: 300
RA: -40
Mash 60 min ~146 degrees
Boil:
Warrior 1.5 oz 60 min
Simcoe 1 oz 30 min
Columbus 2 oz 15 min
Simcoe 2 oz 10 min
Amarillo 1 oz 5 min
Whirlpool:
Simcoe 2 oz
Amarillo 1 oz
Dry Hop:
Simcoe 3 oz
I didn't go backwards to find your recipe but have you tried using cryo? I do think a lot of the pros get better quality hops or have better efficiency(probably often both) but I've found cryo helps a lot getting that hop saturated punch that can sometimes be lacking. I try to use some in all my dry hops for hazys now.View attachment 760963
flavor profile is quite similar, but Heady is more hop-saturated. i suspect The Alchemist's recirculation during dry hopping is making some difference. difficult beer to truly "clone"
I totally agree with you but clone just rolls off the tongue so much better. Let's just keep using that but understand it's beer not sheep in a lab and it's almost impossible to produce a completely identical beer on different systems.It's in message 911 of this thread.
Hopefully, this link will work:
Heady Topper- Can you clone it?
By the way, it's impossible to clone a commercial beer using homebrewer equipment and smaller batch sizes, and different ingredients. Even commercial breweries can't "clone" their own beer, as we all know. I hate the term "clone", and appreciate your use of "replicate". We should all stick to the term "replicated beer" or something similar, and forever do away with the term "clone beer". It's entirely misleading.
I didn't go backwards to find your recipe but have you tried using cryo? I do think a lot of the pros get better quality hops or have better efficiency(probably often both) but I've found cryo helps a lot getting that hop saturated punch that can sometimes be lacking. I try to use some in all my dry hops for hazys now.
it's a good point, i have little doubt Heady uses some amount of concentrated pellet/powder hops
Was thinking the same exact thing…just didn’t say it. When heady first came out and was blowing peoples minds, cryo and lupomax didn’t really exist. They were just using typical T 90 pellets. Most likely still are.Except for the fact that such products didn't really exist when Heady was invented. That's not to say that the recipe may have changed subsequently, or that such products may be useful at a homebrew level.
Hey I was just curious if you had any revisions to this recipe? Also what temp and duration do you whirlpool at? Thanks!I just kegged batch. Definitely not a Heady topper. I finished too low at 1.010. s/b 1.012.
For next batch I would increase 10 min and whirlpool additions. Turned out to be excellent, but not enough hop flavour. I'll stick to .8 oz per gallon dry hop.
View attachment 760963
flavor profile is quite similar, but Heady is more hop-saturated. i suspect The Alchemist's recirculation during dry hopping is making some difference. difficult beer to truly "clone"
Heady isn't your typical super juicy fluffy mouthfeel NEIPA. It's known as the Granddaddy to the style, but if you put it in a flight next to Tree House and Trillium's core NEIPAs, it would stick out like a sore thumb. I think it marries West Coast and East Coast IPAs beautifully. It's not super opaque/hazy at all. Tons of sticky hop flavor and dankness. My guess, is more late addition and WP hops vs DH. I'm sure there's plenty of DHing going on, but not on the level of TH/Trillium/OH etc.I imagine this beer is evolving to adapt to the modern palate. Most brewers in this style are using around 2lbs/bbl dry hop, many NEIPA brewers are using even more. Between that and hop utilization on the homebrew level, quality of hops, and Alchemists' selection, I would probably use 8oz/5 gal to get to the same level of hoppiness.
Heady isn't your typical super juicy fluffy mouthfeel NEIPA. It's known as the Granddaddy to the style, but if you put it in a flight next to Tree House and Trillium's core NEIPAs, it would stick out like a sore thumb. I think it marries West Coast and East Coast IPAs beautifully. It's not super opaque/hazy at all. Tons of sticky hop flavor and dankness. My guess, is more late addition and WP hops vs DH. I'm sure there's plenty of DHing going on, but not on the level of TH/Trillium/OH etc.
I'd be very interested in trying out your recipe if you care to share. Heady, to me, is one of the most unique flavored (New England) IPAs.Haha yep, have definitely had Heady! More whirlpool additions is probably a good way to go, too. I'd opt for 6oz whirlpool and 8oz dry hop, personally. I've made an IPA a while back that came out pretty similar to Heady and it featured 8oz Simcoe in the DH.
I'd be very interested in trying out your recipe if you care to share. Heady, to me, is one of the most unique flavored (New England) IPAs.
I imagine this beer is evolving to adapt to the modern palate. Most brewers in this style are using around 2lbs/bbl dry hop, many NEIPA brewers are using even more. Between that and hop utilization on the homebrew level, quality of hops, and Alchemists' selection, I would probably use 8oz/5 gal to get to the same level of hoppiness.
I've tried a few variations, with quantities similar (or greater) to your suggestions (6 oz whirlpool and 8 oz dry hop).
Roughly:
Water: 250+ sulfate
Fermentable: Fawcett Pearl, dextrose, sometimes small % 10-20L crystal
Kettle: CO2 extract (usually ~10 ml)
WP: Amarillo, Apollo, Columbus, Simcoe
DH: Simcoe (+sometimes Apollo)
Yeast: Conan, 68-72F
After fermentation, crash to ~45-50F for a few days then DH
I've gotten pretty close, but I'd still describe Heady as explosive/bright on the palette in a way I haven't recreated. My gauge being side-by-side tastings.
I know everyone says The Alchemist has been eclipsed by Tree House et al. I disagree: I've found nothing that's as hop-saturated and crushable.
Except for maybe Focal BangerEveryone says The Alchemist has been eclipsed by Tree House et al. I disagree: I've found nothing that's as hop-saturated and crushable.