Happiness is: Home malting

Homebrew Talk - Beer, Wine, Mead, & Cider Brewing Discussion Forum

Help Support Homebrew Talk - Beer, Wine, Mead, & Cider Brewing Discussion Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Hope you're doing it outside. I roasted some just to a quasi brown malt in the oven and was unprepared for the amount of smoke given off just at that level. My wife was less than pleased with my experiment. Think I went by the Barleypopmaker blog which has good info on home roasting. Also saw a YouTube video where someone had taken one of those countertop rotisserie machines and made a drum out of a coffee can for the roaster looked like a great idea been looking for a rotisserie at a garage sale ever since.
 
Also great write up although I'll never get into growing my own barley i would love to be able to make my own specialty malts from 2 row. My nearest lhbs is more than 2 hours away if I could buy a couple sacks of base two row a year and make different styles by self roasting it I'd be thrilled (the hops and yeast ship cheap). I've had decent success with the lighter roasts including crystal by following that Barleypopmaker blog.
 
Thanks Zibe, I'll definitely give those videos a watch before I start to roast. I think making darker malts from pale malt would be totally do-able.
 
Check out the two videos on malting barley at home the second shows the rotisserie and he makes some pretty dark malt. Author is tlgrimmy should find them by typing him into the YouTube search bar.
 
This morning I had a crack at roasting a dark malt in my oven. I ended up baking 1/2 pound of barley for an hour at 350, 30 mins at 415, and 20 mins at 450. It ended up with golden husks, black kernel surfaces, and brown kernel interiors. It didn't smoke much, but ended with a solid astringent taste. I'm. It sure if it's "chocolate malt" yet, or if it needed more time and temp.

Here are some kernels during the 450 F heat treatment:

 
I've put in another half pound into the oven and roasted it at 350 F for 20 mins and 450 F for 20 mins. It looks and tastes about like the first batch.

Last week I also went to a buddy's house and roasted the rest of the barley at 180 F for about two hours. We had a thermometer in the baking trays the barley was loaded into, and it never read higher than 168 F, but it might have a bias.

After that step, which gave the barely a slightly different taste, I took a pound of quick oats and 1.5 pounds of the light roasted barley and brought it up to 350 F for 20 minutes, stirring every 5 mins or so. This gave a small amount of burnt look to the oats, and caused some popping in the barley. I was aiming to make something like a Munich, following a recipe from one of the home malting websites. The oats, which have no enzymes, can be roasted to gain milliard flovors without sacrificing enzymatic power. I'm interested to see how this turns out.

I went to the local homebrew store and bought all the supplies I'll need, plus I ground the malts, keeping the dark malt separate. Brew day is this Sunday!
 
Today, the day before brew day, I'm taking some last preparatory steps. I tried to buy a stock pot large enough for the 7 or 8 gallons I'll need, but I was unsuccessful. I'll have to make do with the five gallon pots I have.

I've also readied the dark malts for cold steeping. Following this article (https://www.homebrewersassociation....steeping-getting-the-most-out-of-dark-grains/) I boiled 2 quarts of water and am now letting that cool. I'll leave the dark malt in overnight, and hopefully get some good tea.
 
Brew day has come and gone. While I had been planning this for weeks and had the whole day blocked out, that didn't stop fate from intervening.

The morning of we got a call from my in-laws that they were in desperate need of help moving out of their house. We went over to help them, and only left several hours after my planned start time, with the promise we'd be back once the beer was away. This meant that Joe, who had until the evening to help me, was only able to be there for the first half of my endeavor. Things might have ended up better if I wasn't in a big rush and had benefited from Joe's experience in the end, but who can say?

I had 1/2 gallon steeping the dark malt (which came out near-black and smelling like coffee), and would use 6.5 gallons for the other 11.8 pounds of grains. I didn't have a pot big enough, so I used a six and five gallon pot, each with about 3 gallons of distilled water. I used two bags, mixed and divided the grain, and once I got to temp I added the bags.

They went in at 160 F, and the temp dropped to 153 F pretty quickly. I turned off the heat and wrapped the pots in coats and sweaters. Every ten minutes or so the temp would drop below 150 F and I'd turn on the burners on low for a minute or so, swirling the pots and and cracking open the lid to stir. The temp fluctuated between 149 and 154 F in this way.

After an hour and 15 mins I lifted out the grains, put on gloves, and squeezed the bags (I know, some people don't do that). The squeezed grain bags still felt pleanty sticky and tasted a little sweet, so I'm sure I left some sugar behind. Either way, I tossed the residue without rinsing and got ready to raise the temp to boil the wort.

Then I remembered I never checked the pH.

I checked it as the temp was starting to climb into the high 150 F, and had trouble reading the very faint hue on the pH strips. My best guess was that the wort was off the 4.5-6.5 scale, on the low end. I added a 1/2 teaspoon of baking soda and worried for about 15 mins. The pH seemed to go closer to 5.5, but the colors on the pH paper did not match the legend on the container very closely at all. My buddy Joe, who's was there helping me, reasoned that the wort tasted sweet, and the starting pH must therefore have been tolerable.

We boiled the wort for about an hour. I added a packet of cascadia hops with about 20 mins left to go. The hops were divided in half in teabags made of cheese cloth, and smelled really good.

After boiling I took each pot out back and dropped the copper cooler in it. I had sanitized it and hooked it up to the very cold garden hose. The wind was howling, and wild yeast could have easily got into the pots as I stirred the copper around.

For each pot, the temp quickly dropped to 115, and didn't go any lower. The first pot I dumped into the six-gallon nozzles bucket at "115", figuring I'd cool the other pot to the correct temp. That one also dropped to 115 F and didn't go any lower. In the pitch black and freezing cold, I got a little suspicious.

I took the thermometer out of the chilled wort and ran it under tap water inside, and it read "121 F". The thermometers were off. I had a matching pair from Target, the kind with a probe on a mesh wire. They were supposed to be good for 40 F to 400 F, but I had suspected on if getting a bias when I used it for malting. The other was brand new that day, and the two were in agreement. Both pots felt room-temp, so in the nozzled bucket they went.

Inside the fermentor was waiting the dark malt. I had taken the steeping from the night before, and ran it through a coffee filter, which mostly cleaned it up. Then I got the camp stove out (the stove top was full of wort-pots), and heated it to 170 to sanitize it. I dumped in in the fermentor, and it had a few hours chilling in there before I started adding wort.

For the yeast, I had a wet pack warming to room temp for about four hours before I used it. I wanted to get it off to a good start, and had a sanitized cup for it to go in. What I didn't have was sanitized water. I took the risk of adding about a cup of filtered water and a few tablespoons of table sugar and mixed that up, letting it sit for about half an hour as I chilled the wort.

I started filling the fermentor with wort and addded the yeast when half the wort was added. A sanitized aerator (from the barley steeping) was dropped in the fermentor and bubbled for about 15 mins. It was then I realized I'd dumped all my sanitized without sanitizing a satillite container, a baster to transfer out a sample, or the hydrometer. That added up to me not getting any hydrometry data. Feeling none to hopeful but at least glad to be done, I pushed the 64 F five gallons of wort into the bar room. It was way past my bed time, and I still had to head to my in-laws and move furniture.

It was a very long day (about six hours of brewing?) that certainly could have gone better. Joe's lending me his time and equipment was invaluable, but my failure to check the the pH combined with to potentially mis-handled yeast may have fatally damaged the process.

Next time I'll have a test instruction with steps delineated and forms for data input made in advance. I'll use different pH paper and thermometers. I'm also going to buy an 8 gallon pot so I can use only one mash tun. I'll build an insulated tub for it out of foam so the mash temp stays constant without extra heat and stirring. I'll also keep at least 1/4 gallon aside to rinse the grains, since I worked hard for those sugars and want to catch them all.

In a few days I'll see if there is any activity in the fermentor. I'll let you know how it goes.
 
Some photos from yesterday:

My pots getting up to temperature:


Straining my dark malts. I think these came out more like a brown or caffe; I'll have to roast longer or hotter next time.


My nozzled bucket draining into the fermentor at the end of the process:
 
It's alive!! At the 21 hour mark the fermentor is bubbling away. There is a lot of yeast-looking material in the bottom, and a complete frothy layer across the top that wasn't there this morning. The ale yeast should be on top, so I'm not sure what's happening.
 
I had 1/2 gallon steeping the dark malt (which came out near-black and smelling like coffee), and would use 6.5 gallons for the other 11.8 pounds of grains. I didn't have a pot big enough, so I used a six and five gallon pot, each with about 3 gallons of distilled water. I used two bags, mixed and divided the grain, and once I got to temp I added the bags.
You should avoid using distilled water unless you're adjusting your water pre-mash. You can use the "Bru'n Water" spreadsheets widely suggested in these forums if you continue with distilled.

After an hour and 15 mins I lifted out the grains, put on gloves, and squeezed the bags (I know, some people don't do that). The squeezed grain bags still felt pleanty sticky and tasted a little sweet, so I'm sure I left some sugar behind. Either way, I tossed the residue without rinsing and got ready to raise the temp to boil the wort.
Squeezing is OKAY (and I would encourage it). Don't forget to sparge, you worked really hard growing all that sugar!

Then I remembered I never checked the pH.

I checked it as the temp was starting to climb into the high 150 F, and had trouble reading the very faint hue on the pH strips. My best guess was that the wort was off the 4.5-6.5 scale, on the low end. I added a 1/2 teaspoon of baking soda and worried for about 15 mins. The pH seemed to go closer to 5.5, but the colors on the pH paper did not match the legend on the container very closely at all. My buddy Joe, who's was there helping me, reasoned that the wort tasted sweet, and the starting pH must therefore have been tolerable.

pH strips are terrible at measuring the pH of your wort. Either use a digital pH meter or trust the "Bru'n Water" spreadsheets.

It was a very long day (about six hours of brewing?) that certainly could have gone better. Joe's lending me his time and equipment was invaluable, but my failure to check the the pH combined with to potentially mis-handled yeast may have fatally damaged the process.

Things always seem to go wrong on brew day and 6 hours isn't surprising for your first time. Don't stress too much - you'll still make beer!

Next time I'll have a test instruction with steps delineated and forms for data input made in advance. I'll use different pH paper and thermometers. I'm also going to buy an 8 gallon pot so I can use only one mash tun. I'll build an insulated tub for it out of foam so the mash temp stays constant without extra heat and stirring. I'll also keep at least 1/4 gallon aside to rinse the grains, since I worked hard for those sugars and want to catch them all.

You have the right ideas to improve your brewing process. I would say that you should reserve much more water for sparging (rinsing). Typically, you want 1.25 quarts of water per pound of grain during the first mash step. I've found this to be unnecessarily low and you can go with more water (as long as you have adjusted for pH and other salts). I would say a good starting point for BIAB is 4-5 gallons in the first mash and 2-3 gallons of sparge water. You know you've extracted everything when your sparge water results in a mash gravity of 1.010. Don't go any lower than that!

Also, fantastic job at malting. You're a rock star and I'll be keeping this post bookmarked in case I ever venture down the malting path!
 
Dang Babaganuj, thanks for all the advice and encouragement! Both go a long way to helping me out for next time.

I've decided that I want another crack at this whether it goes well or not. To that end, I'm going to start malting the next batch of grain over the long weekend. Regardless of what happens with the current batch, I can make a pale malt out of it all (roasting darker if needed later) and store it a few months.
 
My friend and I grew about 60 pounds on Conlon 2 row summer barley over the summer and I have been waiting for some time to malt. Our first time. This thread is great reading.

Do you know the time in hours it took for you to go from the beginning of wetting the grain to the start of the drying process when you needed to stop the seed from growing?
I have done a test batch and over grew the sprouts. The sprouts grew a lot between the time I left for work and then arrived home.
I would like to figure the time I need to begin drying and make certain I am home with time to process it. I figure the window is only a few hours.

Can a picture be resized?

IMG_20160901_194758_430(1).jpg
 
sfish, after two 8-hour soaking period during the first day, I found that two and a half additional days was sufficient for a small portion of acrospires to start bursting through.

Now, the sprouts (rootlets) will end up about three time the length of the kernels, but it's the acrospire (inner shoot, looks like a sliver or a leaf, and is under the husk until it gets over the length of kernel) that tells the progress of the germination. When a few acrospires start pushing through the husk and becoming visible is when the whole lot is in that 75-100% length-of-kernel range.
 
Yesterday, at the one week mark, the fermentor was bubbling at one bubble every 90 seconds. The high point was on Tuesday when it was trucking along at one bubble every second. The color is also much darker than it was when all the yeast was suspended.

I ordered a keg last week, and I'll be legging the beer next weekend, I think.
 
CtrlMaltDel, awesome to see you're getting into malting! Sounds like you had a successful first go of it, which not all of us can say :) I ended up with some nasty, stinky compost my first couple times.

Have you started your next batch yet? What have you thought about changing in your malting process/setup?
 
Is it better to have slightly undermodified malt or slighty overmodified malt?

I think undermodified would be better with set rest when mashing.
 
Awesome! More home maltster interest. Myself, I am still dealing with life . . . . . even BUYING beer. We do have some Mead in the cooler though :)
 
Homemalt, I'll have to wait and taste my brew before I venture to take any credit for it working! I am considering how to push more grain through each time I malt- I think the drying phase is my bottle neck right now. If I can get more food dehydrators I can scale up my six-pound batches into 12-pound batches with little trouble.

My garden is exciting for me, and will give me a shot next fall of having a truly home made product. I planted 200 square feet and expect 20-30 pounds of grain.

sfish, I tried reading a few papers about levels of modification, but it was all pretty complicated. It does sound like prevailing wisdom is that 75-100% modification is desired, and a protein rest can liberate enzymes trapped in undermodified grains.

Keep malting when you're able, Colo! Your the catalyst for so much fun here in the thread!
 
COLObrewer Maybe we should send you some homebrew

Thanks CtrlMaltDel I am going with under for now.

Posted this on another thread but seems more relevent here.

So far on my road to brew a farmhouse ale "from field to glass"~
A friend and I have planted and harvested about 60 pounds of barley and needs to be malted. This took 2 years because the first year it was planted in the winter and froze. We have grown 10 pounds of red wheat as will.

we have harvested about a pound of hops from second year plants.

We have harvested 2 strains of yeast.

I will call this "homegrow beer".

Next year I will rinse the skins of grapes and apples grown on his land, add to a starter and see is I can harvest a strain of yeast.

I will call this "Terrior Beer"

------------
Have you read this book?
"The Perfect Keg: Sowing, Scything, Malting & Brewing My Way to the Best-Ever Pint of Beer" by Ian Coutts

It was being passed around, don't know it the chain stopped though.

https://www.homebrewtalk.com/showthread.php?t=496350
 
Is it better to have slightly undermodified malt or slighty overmodified malt?

I think undermodified would be better with set rest when mashing.

What's "better" is up to your own discretion, of course. The degree of modification gives you different options as a brewer.

Most commercial malts these days are overmodified, and thus affectionately termed "powdered beer." Your mashing options are limited with powdered beer. A good chunk of the enzymatic work that was once done in the mash is now done in the malthouse. That's why protein rests have basically ceased to be a thing - the protein inside the kernel has already been degraded enough by the malting process, so there’s not much more the protein enzymes (proteases) can do during the mash.

Undermodified malts give the brewer more flexibility in their mash. For this reason, they were preferred by traditional European brewers who wanted more control over the process.
 
sfish, that is amazing! I don't have the guts yet to try and use my own yeast, bravo and good luck to you on that score. How did your second barley harvest go? Did you use any soil measurements to track nitrogen levels? Did your plants tinge yellow just before the winter started (mine have, not sure if that's normal)?

Homemaltster, that's great info, thanks for providing that.
 
homemaltster Thank I will shoot for undermodified malt.

CtrlMaltDel Second went well that is where we harvested about 60 pounds of Conlon spring barley, planted 5 pounds of seed. The darker green in the field is the barley harvested in July. the amber is wheat.

tHE

IMG_20160614_174950_992.jpg


IMG_20160614_174839_297(1).jpg
 
That is glorious, sfish. It looks like your patch is about two or three times the size of mine, so I think my estimate of twenty to thirty pounds is good.

I can't wait to watch my barley grow next summer. I'll be harvesting in early August, I believe.
 
I'm at the two-week point of fermentation today. My fermentor is still at 68 F, and it's still bubbling at about 1 bubble every two minutes. I'm not sure how long this will last!

My keg arrived in the mail, so I've started preparing for the keg and tap system to be installed. I've bought a handful of parts to make a fan that can recirculate air in the mini fridge, and I've bought parts to make an insulated pipe to carry the beer line behind the wall from the mini fridge to the tap.

I'm all little hesitant to start sawing away the dry wall, but I've put a 1" hole in the fridge this morning:



I used an exacto knife to cut through the plastic wall inside the fridge, and carefully carved through the insulation so as not to hit any coolant lines. I never saw any, and reached the metal exterior wall. That was harder to get through. I punched a series of hole with a small drill, then used the exacto to connect each hole.

I'll make the next steps later this week.
 
There is beer!



Fermenting appeared to be complete by the three week mark. I'd seen bubbling at about a bubbled every two minutes on the second week mark, but things calmed down since then. Now, at three and a half weeks, I got in a tasted it.

After sanitizing my new keg, a few bottles, etc, I opened up the fermentor. It smelled like flat beer. I poured a glass, and the first thing I noticed was the light color. My "oatmeal stout" is actually an amber, but that's fine. The taste is a little fruity and a little sour, so something went sideways in the fermenting, but it's totally drinkable. Based on how I felt 20 mins after finishing the glass, there is plenty of alcohol in it.

I boiled sugar water, all carefully weighed out, and added it to three cans which I filled with beer and capped. Those are going to a cabin with us this weekend, where my buddy Joe will get to taste the beer he helped me make. The rest was poured into the keg, and sealed up. The keg is hanging out in the refrigerated kegerator-to-be. I'll have to put the line system in next week or after Christmas.

I'm very excited that it turned out okay! This is too much fun.
 
Great to hear that you're happy with the final product! You should be - you made beer from scratch!

I think roasting malts is one of those things that you're just not gonna get right on your first try. It's arguably the most skill-based part of the malting process. Roasting technicians need quick judgment that only comes from experience.

p.s. Dang, you are on top of your Christmas shopping!
 
Thanks homemaltster. The lightness of color is definitely from not getting the dark roast correct. I think the off-flavors are probably from the temp being too low for the first day and too high for the day after before getting to the correct range.

We tried to bottle a few last week and drank them this weekend, and there was zero carbonation. I very carefully sanitized everything and added just the right amount of sugar, and kept the bottles at fermenting temp for four days, so I'm not sure what happened. We still drank them, but it wasn't anything to write home about. It's a good think I've got a keg for the rest of it.
 
Thanks homemaltster. The lightness of color is definitely from not getting the dark roast correct. I think the off-flavors are probably from the temp being too low for the first day and too high for the day after before getting to the correct range.

We tried to bottle a few last week and drank them this weekend, and there was zero carbonation. I very carefully sanitized everything and added just the right amount of sugar, and kept the bottles at fermenting temp for four days, so I'm not sure what happened. We still drank them, but it wasn't anything to write home about. It's a good think I've got a keg for the rest of it.

Bottle conditioning often takes 2 weeks or more - some people have gone 5 weeks before the beer carbonated. That's part of the reason I started kegging after my first batch :D
 
Hi guys,
I am a home malter myself, starting malt and beer production three years ago. Roughly I've made close to 120 kg (270 pounds) of malt and close to 400 L (100 gallons) of beer.
From my understanding, it is better to make malt at lower temperatures as those mentioned on this topic. I try to use values close to 10oC (50oF) as often as possible. I made the growing phase of malting in a cellar in those moment in the year when the temperature is closer to that value. In the rare case when the lack of malt determine me to make malt at higher temp (no more than 17oC, 62oF), the resulting malt has less enzyme, causing a significant decrease of the brewing yield (with something like 5%). For the next favorable temperature window (april-may) I will try to make malt starting to 8oC (46oF). The slower the acrospire growth, the higher will be the concentration o enzyme.
I have a different approach in making heavy roasted malt. I use a home bread machine which is designed to act during baking as of a thermostat. My Moulinex machine uses 225oC (440oF), value that I had measured. To obtain a light chocolate malt, I'm roasting for about 15 h (repeating the just baking program for 15 times). For darker versions, something like 25 h (in two consecutive days). The procedure is not efficient for roasting unmalted wheat.
 
ain, you raise a good point. Traditionally, grain was steeped and germinated at lower temperatures, often 50-55F, to keep germination slow and consistent throughout the grain bed. Germination could take a whole week or two at that rate.

Modern-day commercial maltsters try to speed up germination to produce malt as quickly as possible, so they germinate at higher temps (60-68F). This has cut germination times down to 3 or 4 days. Does that make the best malt? Probably not. But they have such tight process control that they can still make a consistent product.

If you're malting at home and don't have tight control over the malting process, you'll keep things more consistent by malting at lower temps (55-60F seems fine). At higher temps, some kernels germinate quickly and some putter along slowly, resulting in uneven modification. Your grain can really get out of control, as I'm sure some of you have experienced.
 
Howdy guys, I've been taking some time off for the holidays, and my beer has been chilling in a keg in a mini fridge for about a month. Luckily, I've had some days off work due to snow and I've finally made progress on setting up the tap system.

I wanted a tap coming out of the wall rather than out of the top of a fridge, for purely aesthetic reasons. To this end, I bought a length of 1" pvc, some insulation, and assorted joints. I needed to get a beer line out of the fridge, into the wall, out the wall at around eye level, attached to the faucet, insulated, and somehow have air circulating around it to keep it cool.

I decided on this: I'd insulate a length of pipe with elbows at each end, run an air tube and beer line through it, cut two holes in my bar's dry wall, get the pipe behind the drywall and attach it's end to either hole. The upper hole would need to have room for the faucet to attach, both would need to fix the pipe in place, and both would need to be airtight to help the air circulation work.

Here is the insulated pipe with the two tubes within it:



I arbitrarily cut a hole in the mini fridge, pushed into the back corner of the bar, and marked where on the drywall the fridge hole lined up and cut a matching hole there. Then I eyeballed where I wanted the faucet to be and cut a hole up top. This patch of drywall happened to back a built-in bookshelf, and there was only about 3" behind it. To push the thick insulated pipe through the upper hole behind the dry wall, the upper hole had to be quite large. I finally got the pipe through, and had the threads on the elbow just sticking through the bottom hole. I used a threaded nut on the outside of the wall to hold the bottom in place. The top of the pipe rests against a stud that boarders the upper hole:



With the bottom of the pipe attached, I used some pliers to pull the air and beer lines partially through, then pushed the fridge in place. Another threaded coupler on the inside of the fridge attached to the part of the nut that protruded into the fridge, holding the fridge to the wall and pipe. The ends of both tubes hung slack inside the fridge, and the top of the pipe was flush with the plane of the drywall so a faceplate would make a seal:



Now I just need to wait for the piece that connects the beer line to the shank, which I only just ordered after realizing I didn't have one, screw a face plate over the giant upper hole, attach the faucet, and run sanitizer through everything.

I'm almost there!
 
Here is a rough schematic:



The only correction I need to add is that the top elbow is in line with the outside of the drywall, not inside. This is important so that the air is circulating in a closed loop, and not being lost behind the drywall. I'm still putting together the circulation system, following these excellent instructions: http://www.instructables.com/id/Build-a-Beer-Tower-Cooler-to-keep-your-Kegerator-t/

This whole project, the tap system not least, has been a colossus of trial-and-error. Every few days I'd work on it a little and have to stop and plan a trip to Home Depot because something didn't quite fit or wouldn't make a seal. I'm glad to see it coming to a close.

I really enjoy a hefty nitro pour, and hopefully in a few days I'll be basking in the foaming chill radiance of a home tap system. The been on tap might not be perfect, but I've already deemed it drinkable and a thick head isn't likely to make it worse. I suppose the real payoff will be when I make batch two and can just fill up and connect a keg, instead of bottling or messing around with tubes behind walls :)
 
I've constructed the air circulator and the wooden face plate. Now I just need the slightly-longer shank to arrive and to sanitize the system.

Here's the project enclosure with fan, electrical plug, and hole for the air hose. I had to use a soldering iron to put this all together! It was super-simple, but it made me feel accomplished.



This piece sits inside the coldest part of the mini fridge and pushes cold air along the pipe with the beer line in it, so everything stays cold.

I'm not sure how much air is really moving, but the fan spins along quite well.
 
Back
Top