EdWort
Well-Known Member
PeteOz77 said:Politics and religion... I keep forgetting....![]()
Yeah, me too.
I like beer though. :cross:
PeteOz77 said:Politics and religion... I keep forgetting....![]()
the_bird said:
So let me get this straight, Pete.PeteOz77 said:The replacement, is a blind black man. I don't know this guy's credentials, but a crime fighting, outstanding former AG seems the better choice, even if he DOES have to pay for sex with the sort of women he desires.
Balancing out the pros and cons of the entire situation, it seems too bad that someone doing as good of a job as he seemed to be, is cast aside in favour of another, less appropriate candidate.
kornkob said:So let me get this straight, Pete.
You don't know anything about Spitzer's replacement except that he is blind and black yet you assume that the replacement is 'less appropriate' for the job than Spitzer.
Let's be honest here: you have no freaking idea whether the new guys is better worse or the same than the lying, duplicitious guy that just got run out of office.
As far as I am concerned, netiher being blind or being black makes you a bad candidate for the job. Being a hypocrite and participating in the very crimes you claimed to be fighting as you climbed into the job does make you a bad candidate.
Yep. That's why so many were calling for his head. Good riddance and DLTDHYITAOTWO.kornkob said:Being a hypocrite and participating in the very crimes you claimed to be fighting as you climbed into the job does make you a bad candidate.
paulthenurse said:What is this word coming to when a man can't run for Public office and get a some hookers on the side?
DUH!!!!! I say it's money well spent.
EdWort said:Yep. That's why so many were calling for his head. Good riddance and DLTDHYITAOTWO.
Look for the Spitzman to be indicted soon. Possible charges are...
* Money laundering for trying to conceal the source and recipient of financial transactions.
* Tax evasion, if he was a knowing party to an all-cash business that wasn't filing taxes.
* Violation of the Mann Act for paying for the trip from New York to D.C. by the call girl known as "Kristen."
* Misuse of state resources, if he used his state-issued credit card for hotels or meals with prostitutes as well as if he was being protected by State Troopers during his dalliances.
* And finally, soliciting prostitution.
I just wonder who will buy the governorship next? Corzine bought the NJ and Bloomberg bought NYC. Afterall, it's only money.
Can you imagine the brewing equipment you could have for a fraction of what these guys spent of their own money to buy their position of power?
EdWort said:Actually, if he wasn't such a hypocrite, most folks would go BFD and move on, but the a-hole is one of those "Do as I say, not as I do" pr1cks.
As far as money well spent, would you still say that if you were a NY tax payer and it turns out he spending your confiscated hard earned money on high priced nookie?
He's nothing to be proud of and everything he's done just proves his idiocy.
paulthenurse said:It appears the sarcasm in my post wasn't apparent. I'll try to lay it on a bit thicker next time.
:cross:
skinfiddler said:![]()
I just keep thinkin that if prostitution were legal (and it aint goin away) that there would not be $5000 whores.
kornkob said:As far as I am concerned, netiher being blind or being black makes you a bad candidate for the job. Being a hypocrite and participating in the very crimes you claimed to be fighting as you climbed into the job does make you a bad candidate.
PeteOz77 said:Of course there would... probably a lot more expensive than that as well.
People that have the money spend that much on a fine bottle of wine, when they could have had a $50 bottle instead and still have a good bottle of wine and the dizzying euphoria it provides.
Why pay $5000 on a bottle of wine when a $50 bottle will suffice? Because you want the BEST. Some idea behind driving a Ferrari.
Think of all of those men with a LOT more money than looks etc, they would NEVER get to have sex with someone as hot as this woman (unless she was marrying him for his money...same thing, except it's legal) if they didn't pay for it.
You want the best? It's gonna cost you.
And before anyone pipes in and says "She's not THAT great" Of course she is! She's AMAZINGLY HOT...to someone/s She's maybe not what you would like, but then your dream hottie may not be the greatest to a lot of other guys either.
I never saw the attraction to Pamela Anderson, but a lot of guys certainy did. If prostitution were legal and and Pammy were charging $10K for a session, the line would still be 5 miles long, and she's old news...
Nope. Like pot, the price is inflated because of illegality.
skinfiddler said:Nope. Like pot, the price is inflated because of illegality.
Bad call on your parttodd_k said:ib4tl!![]()
I do NOT elect them to tell me how to live my damn life. There are other countries on the planet I could live in if I wanted that.