• Please visit and share your knowledge at our sister communities:
  • If you have not, please join our official Homebrewing Facebook Group!

    Homebrewing Facebook Group

Flanders red question

Homebrew Talk

Help Support Homebrew Talk:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

calebawilson

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 24, 2010
Messages
191
Reaction score
2
Location
Katy, tx
I have never done a Flanders red or any sour for that matter what I want to know is I am going to brew Jamils Flanders recipe and pitch the Roselare blend into jt. Is there a reason why I should secondary it or just leave it in the primary the whole time until bottling.
 
You will want to secondary after the primary yeast has dropped from suspension. You do not want it setting on autolyzed yeast for a year or two while the sour flavors develop.
 
So about how long is that going to take is it a couple of weeks or months whats a ball park figure. I'm trying to plan some ahead.
 
So about how long is that going to take is it a couple of weeks or months whats a ball park figure. I'm trying to plan some ahead.

When primary fermentation is complete. Also, I'd recommend you pitch the roeselare directly with the primary yeast. If you ferment it like Jamil suggests the beer won't come out very tart at all.
 
I plan on only pitching Roselares so once the gravity stabilizes I am going to transfer to secondary and let it stay for a year. Sound good? Can I use the yeast cake for new wort?
 
you can certainly reuse it but logic dictates that everything in there grows at different rates so what you wind up with isn't going to be what you started with (it could be better, but i don't know, i've never used roselare).

as for how long to leave it on, historically, flanders reds are not left on the cake like lambics... that being said, my flanders has been on the yeast cake for a while now (3 months?) - i should probably rack it to the barrel soon...
 
That's cool I will be doing mine about the same temp in the closet. Thanks for you guys help. Any other tips I should know about sours?
 
Can't find my source on this ATM, but IIRC flemish beers are traditionally racked off the yeast whereas lambic are left on it. However, I brewed a beer with Roselare ~6 months ago and have left it in primary. You won't have any ill effects from autolysis because the brett can metabolize dead sacch without causing bad flavors.

Everything I've read has indicated that each reuse of a Roselare yeast cake will result in a more sour beer than the previous.
 
How many uses do you think you can get from the yeast cake before it would produce to sour of a beer?
 
How many uses do you think you can get from the yeast cake before it would produce to sour of a beer?

I would suspect that if you used a fresh sacc yeast each time and only used a small amount of the cake, you could keep the sourness under control.
 
How many uses do you think you can get from the yeast cake before it would produce to sour of a beer?

I'm re-pitching my roeselare for the 3rd time this morning (this time into a oud bruin).

The second batch of flanders I did came out very similar to the first - which is to say, great! So I'd say you can definately get away with 2.

I was hoping just the opposite was true - that each successive batch would get less sour, since I thought the yeast would overtake the bacteria. Dunno.
 
I'm re-pitching my roeselare for the 3rd time this morning (this time into a oud bruin).

The second batch of flanders I did came out very similar to the first - which is to say, great! So I'd say you can definately get away with 2.

I was hoping just the opposite was true - that each successive batch would get less sour, since I thought the yeast would overtake the bacteria. Dunno.

Bacteria reproduces at a faster rate than yeast so you'll end up with successively more sour batches.
 
.....in ideal growth media. The dextrines left in wort is not idea. The bacteria lives off the brettanomyces ability to liberate glucose molecules from the complex carbohydrates. I think the reason the bacteria continue to grow in each successive batch is just that each batch has a higher proportion of bacteria compared to the original blend. So instead of 1mil/ml there is like 1.5 in the second and 2mil/ml in the third. With out a correction of additional yeast the blend gets out of balance and becomes bacteria dominant. That's my understanding of the bacterial interaction with brett in these fermentations at least.
 
.The bacteria lives off the brettanomyces ability to liberate glucose molecules from the complex carbohydrates. I

any source for this??

The reason I ask is that brett alone will not super-attenuate, however in conjunction with the pedio/lacto/etc is will, so I'd be hesitant to say that the brett is the reason the bacteria continue to grow

I think the bacteria also come to dominate because as they lower the pH it become more and more inhospitable to the sacch
 
Really, I'm still trying to figure it out. I think Wild Brews mentions how b-glucosidase is produced by the brettanomyces which allows for monosaccharide cleavage. Pediococcus I think also produces b-glucosidase. I think the enzymes produced are species specific so some may produce glucosidase and some may not. If it doesn't pediococcus will certainly produce some other hydrolyzing enzyme that can contribute to the super attenuation properties of this brett/pedio relationship. I have read the papers from Leuven about lambics but I didn't run across any attempting to explain how and why brett combined with pedio will super attenuate.

So you're right that the bacteria probably don't grow just because of the brett. Instead I think it'd be better to say that the bacteria grow in conjunction with the brett in a somewhat symbiotic relationship.
 
I have two flanders reds going. One I did about 10 months ago with Roselare. I had it on the yeast cake for 7 months before transfering to secondary onto 1 oz. of French oak cubes that I boiled for 30 minutes. My thinking was, I wanted a bit more Brett in the finished product and that is the reason why Lambic brewers allow the beer to sit on the dead yeast for the entire fermentation. That one is starting to get nice and sour and is really coming along. Check it out HERE

When I transfered that batch, I brewed a new batch to put on top of the yeast cake as I heard that Roselare blend gets more sour the more times you re-pitch it. That one HERE is 3 months old, still on the yeast cake, and certainly progressing faster then my first batch!

Did you brew this? How's it going?
 
I brewed a Flanders red about a month ago it is still on the yeast I did not add and not sac just the blend thinking I may put another batch on the yeast cake in the next week or two and transfer it to a secondary to age on some oak cubes.
 
What have you heard I'll give my feed back once it has aged. My thought is why add more sac yeast if the blend already has it.
 
I had heard on a few different forums that it took a long time for fermentation to start with just the smack pack and that using another sacc strain along with it was maybe not necessary, but advised. Good to know! Cheers! I've put so many different bugs in my first Flanders there is some major diversity going on in there. I'm just about the brew another batch of Flanders Red with the ECY Flanders Blend! Pretty excited for that!
 
Back
Top