arturo7
Well-Known Member
The players are considering decertifying the union then suing the owners for antitrust violations.
http://www.tsn.ca/nhl/story/?id=410312
http://www.tsn.ca/nhl/story/?id=410312
Really though? So lets say Bettman does in fact die today.
You've still got Donald "no linkage" Fehr dealing with 30 owners. Nothing changes, except all the hate that Bettman absorbs is instead distributed elsewhere.
EVERYONE has their head up their ass in this thing. There is zero trust on both sides, and thus the resistance to extend an olive branch from one side to the other. Bettman's not the problem.
homercidal said:no. Most of the 30 some owners are not participating in the negotiations. They are content to sit back and see how much the others can wrangle from the union. They would actually prefer to get a deal done and play hockey. It's the few losers who can't make money in the most profitable period in hockey history who are holding out for pocket change. The ones who signed some huge contracts right before the lockout, never actually planning on paying them out.
If not for those few, we would have hockey. And bettman doesn't want to concede that there may be a couple of markets where hockey shouldn't be, or that ownership isn't savvy enough to turn a profit in those markets.
After all those years of expansion, he would look like a fool if they have to contract the league to clean out a couple of losing clubs.
We'll see what federal mediators can do to help move the process along. Although they can't make anything binding on their own, perhaps they can discover exactly what is holding up the process and figure out an agreement that both sides will be willing to sign.
No. Most of the 30 some owners are not participating in the negotiations. They are content to sit back and see how much the others can wrangle from the union. They would actually prefer to get a deal done and play hockey. It's the few losers who can't make money in the most profitable period in hockey history who are holding out for pocket change. The ones who signed some huge contracts right before the lockout, never actually planning on paying them out.
If not for those few, we would have hockey. And Bettman doesn't want to concede that there may be a couple of markets where hockey shouldn't be, or that ownership isn't savvy enough to turn a profit in those markets.
After all those years of expansion, he would look like a fool if they have to contract the league to clean out a couple of losing clubs.
We'll see what federal mediators can do to help move the process along. Although they can't make anything binding on their own, perhaps they can discover exactly what is holding up the process and figure out an agreement that both sides will be willing to sign.
The NHL can kiss my ass - I'm totally over this whole thing now. Yeah, if hockey starts I'll come back and watch, but really I'm fine with a lost season at this point. Owners, players, agents, they all just piss me off now.
How do you know what the owners are doing? You talking to them? All I know is that they've had Gary Bettman representing them for 20 years - doesn't seem like they're too upset with what he's done.
As soon as I heard federal mediators, my heart sank - this is not good news. They used mediators in 2004 and it went nowhere. In fact, mediators have never worked for any of the previous labour negotiations in any major sport.
The NHL can kiss my ass - I'm totally over this whole thing now. Yeah, if hockey starts I'll come back and watch, but really I'm fine with a lost season at this point. Owners, players, agents, they all just piss me off now.
Homercidal said:when (if) they get back to playing.
Bulls Beers said:This blows... I'm usually watching a Bruins game right now. If the Feds can't help these pricks, not sure who can...Unfortunately, I think the season is lost. I hope I'm wrong.
Just read where the NHL and NHLPA are sending a few from each camp for direct discussions. No Gary Bettman, no Donal Fehr. Just 6-7 from each side.
Sounds like mediators have either failed, or have come to the conclusion that NOTHING will come from Bettman and Fehr leading talks.
I hope this is the point where both sides finally realize that they are both goign to lose with this kind of a stand.
Just read where the NHL and NHLPA are sending a few from each camp for direct discussions. No Gary Bettman, no Donal Fehr. Just 6-7 from each side.
Sounds like mediators have either failed, or have come to the conclusion that NOTHING will come from Bettman and Fehr leading talks.
I hope this is the point where both sides finally realize that they are both goign to lose with this kind of a stand.
paulster2626 said:So if Sidney Crosby saves the season, how will jkratzer feel about it?
Life's greatest mysteries...
Bettman says no. Apparently (And I will admit I kind of skimmed since I am busy this morning) the players wanted 8 years contract length and the NHL says that "5-7 is the hill we die on."
Minutes after Fehr announced progress and that they were close, Bettman announced his disappointment and said they were far apart and rejected the NHLPA offer and closed talks.
Well what it comes down to is that the Owners don't care about playing hockey. They only care about taking as much of the pie as they can get.
Bettman himself said that the owners demand "3 or 4 things". They can work with the players on the other things. Nobody wants to negotiate with ultimatums like that.
It's not really a bargaining process. That would imply there is some give and take from both sides. Players aren't gaining a single thing from this. It's not like they are giving up 7% of revenue and getting something in return. Just maybe less of a buggering in some other area.
Leeds1 said:A 30 team league isn't viable, contraction would a good thing for the NHL.
If that's Fehr's goal then we'll be here forever. Bettman is a bottomless source of frustration.
Those things you mentioned the owners were giving to the players were things that they took away at the start of the negotiations. It's not like the players are anywhere near gaining. They are still losing badly.
The league has no interest in finding other ways of making money for themselves with the portion they receive. They took 25% just the last contract and ended up in worse shape than ever even when you add their portion of the massive increase in revenue.
It's time they got serious about ending the lockout. At this point it's all about Bettman saving face. He came on camera spitting and sputtering mad about the union taking their concession and wanting to move on to the next provision. That's negotiating. Did he expect them to suddenly roll over on all the other provisions? If so then he is even more ignorant than people think.
He's in a tough spot. The union can disband and sue if it comes to that. Then the league can hire scabs and replacements if it dares. Not sure how that would work out as far as fans go. That's like someone taking the engine out of your 550 HP sports car and replacing it with an L4 Chevy.
I just started to wonder if the league planned on cutting ticket prices if they end up getting a certain amount of concessions from the players. They might be able to afford to attract more fans to the arenas if they spend less on player salaries and perks...
I bet that's what they are trying to do. Make games more afordable for the fans. Yeah. That's it.
You said it's the players who are giving everything - the owners are offering no concessions. I agree with this, but please tell me what exactly the owners have to offer. What could they offer?
Also I'm curious as to how much cheaper you think ticket prices should get to attract fans to places like Phoenix and Tampa.
Well teams like the LA Clippers have $11 tickets.