Crydom for the WIN! The used ones I have have lasted a very long time. 40amp SSRs on a 23amp circuit.
BTW, I've been to Fenton MO several times. Pretty small town.
Crydom for the WIN! The used ones I have have lasted a very long time. 40amp SSRs on a 23amp circuit.
you mentioned the output light on the pid started to flash on and off when setpoint was reached? if there is a led on the srr that should have been flashing too... even if it was flashing there is a v ery real chance the ssr has failed and is stuck in the on position as they often fail in that state. if the output light on the pid was in fact flashing then I suspect that was working correctly.During the auto tune process it flashes from "AT" to the temp current. Once the auto tune is complete it stops flashing. Right?
The auto tune stopped, it stopped flashing and the temp kept rising. I figured at 170 it was safe to give up on it.
Skin effect is usually only of concern for high frequencies, as the skin thickness decreases with decreasing frequency. There are many skin depth calculators on-line (here's one.) At 60 Hz the skin depth is a little less than 0.4", and the diameter of a 10AWG wire is a bit more than 0.1". Thus skin effect is irrelevant for brewing control panels (and lots of other things), so the current runs thru the entire cross section....
Remember too current runs on the outside of the wire. Current doesn't run thru the wire.
The purpose of a heat sink is not to absorb heat, but rather to transfer heat from the source (SSR) to the air. In order to do this the base of the heat sink needs to conduct heat from the source to the fins. Thickness improves conduction laterally within the base, which improves heat conduction to the fins farther away from the heat source, but that really has nothing to do with the mass. For vertical heat conduction, a thin base is actually better.That heat sink is big, but it sure is thin..... All the fins don't help much without some mass to absorb the heat to begin with.
I'd set a PC fan on top of it too.
The purpose of a heat sink is not to absorb heat, but rather to transfer heat from the source (SSR) to the air. In order to do this the base of the heat sink needs to conduct heat from the source to the fins. Thickness improves conduction laterally within the base, which improves heat conduction to the fins farther away from the heat source, but that really has nothing to do with the mass. For vertical heat conduction, a thin base is actually better.
I suspect, like the OP, that the original issue was the excessive thickness of the thermal paste, and perhaps its quality as well. The fact that the heat sink is getting warmer with the new, thinner paste indicates that more heat is being conducted from the SSR to the heat sink, which is a good thing. OP should be fine with the new configuration.
Brew on![]()
Ok, first my credentials. Before my retirement, I was a Senior Engineer at a major electronics manufacturing firm. My responsibilities were electronic packaging. Thermal management (getting rid of the heat generated by active components) is one of the major functions of, and concerns with, packaging electronics. I have some real expertise here.Um, no.
Because, physics. Its a combination of the two thermodynamic principles. Thermal mass and radiation. Pretty simple equations. I use Al chill blocks for TIG all the time. No "fins". I guarantee the heat sink in that photo is cold at the edges and 160F in the middle. Useless.
Screw your SSR to a beer can. I really don't care. I'm just pointing out facts, boss.
In the mean time one or two people will just keep whining about "fake chinese SSRs blowing up".
I seem to remember brundog using that exact line on you a few weeks ago.Um, no.
Because, physics.
I seem to remember brundog using that exact line on you a few weeks ago.
Tell you what I'll just keep doing my thing by "whining" and warning people of the garbage ssrs and you just keep talking down to all of us simple folks when we are wrong
BTW OP I have a panel I made a few years ago that uses a non anodized version of that same heatsink mounted on a plastic enclosure with an SSVR AND a 25a ssr for controlling both the bk and HLT mounted to it .. no overheating issues. That why I mentioned I think your setup should not have failed.. I also have no idea how much paste was between your ssr and sink either. and I now that I think about it there was another case of the ssr failing from too much paste about 6 months ago here.
I'll throw in. With a heat sink, mass, no matter how large, only absorbs/conducts heat from a source like an SSR until it reaches equilibrium with the source.
At that point, you are depending on transfer of the heat energy to the air to lower or maintain the temperature to some safe level. The greater the surface area of the heat sink, the more effective it is in transferring heat to the air, whether that be by conduction, convection or radiation.