Mega brewers don't use the same ingredients. Its like saying wonder bread is made with wheat, and that's the same as your local bakery that makes a 12 grain. The author goes on to say that "some consumers" criticize corporate brewers and then go on to ignore infected or "inconsistent" beer. How does he know that anyone does this? And what's wrong with one batch of beer being slightly different than the one before? Is every single burger or flatbread pizza at the fern decorated bistro in his neighborhood exactly the same? Why does beer made in a small brewery have to meet some standard of perfection set in an industrial brewery? If you want consistency, eat at micky D's, drink coor's, bud, or miller light and make grilled cheese with wonder bread and velveeta.
That anti-adjunct Reinheitsgebot tripe needs to go.
The big brewers use adjuncts for the same reason as craft brewers do. If BMC can't use corn to dry the beer and lighten body, then most of the IPAs need to go too, because they use sugar to do the exact same thing.
What this is is a bunch of people who can't brew on the same level as the big guys trying to bash their product.
I WISH I had the skill to brew as well and consistently as the big guys.
Dog the business practice and the company, but don't dog the beer.
And I've seen folks who should know better hand me a "Berliner Weisse" from a craft brewery, and think it's awesome. Thing smells like parmesan, and vomit from a very poorly performed sour mash. The beer never should have been released, and was awful, but people ate it up simply because "it's a sour beer and sour beers are cool and its a craft brewery so it has to be cool".
"Craft" just like "artisan" or "natural" is a marketing term, nothing more. Hence why the BA can change the definition at will to either kick someone out of the club or allow them to stay.
I think the article is pretty on point and objective, and stays nice and clear of all the BS politics associated with "macro" and "craft" beer.