I think episode 3 was a big improvement in terms of balancing the aforementioned hardcore / medium / novice trio of hosts. I know you said you didn't plan the NorCal theme, but it worked really well, and being able to talk about trends in clean, low abv well executed classic styles via Anchor was great.
Which brings me to a podcast question:
Will you put a guess to when we will see a decline in fruited beers and a return to well very well executed riffs on classic styles? While this question equally applies to berliner / gose / sour ipa / milkshake ipa / whatever fruited thing is next, I am more specifically thinking about saisons. We have seen a progression from fruiting beers with things like puree, to the high-end market moving towards sourcing local, whole fruit (i.e Casey) or working with purveyors of high end fruit (e.g
cquiroga), but a lot of fruit beers are hiding something more beautiful underneath or just masking the flaws of the base beer. I'm not sure there is a stonefruit beer in existence that is better than just eating one of Chris' peaches. Give me a Stenciled Pages over Westly any day of the week and twice on Sunday.
I'm obviously biased (although I suppose I was tagged here so I could weigh in on this), but I don't really agree with the argument in this. I mean, I think there is sort of a false narrative or false dichotomy/trichotomy set up here. I absolutely love "beer that tastes like beer," so I can relate to a yearning for more vocal appreciation of "classic styles," but I just don't see that fruited beers have exactly taken over the world, to the detriment of anything else.... Are you really having trouble finding great examples of non-fruited saisons? Stenciled Pages exists, and Westly can exist too.
And if you say the unadulterated Masumoto fruit is amazing (I agree, it is), I can't see how that says anything negative about stonefruit beer... These are two different things. Luckily, we can have both. If anything, it sounds like I almost feel the opposite as you do about the excitement around these adjuncts-- that it's really awesome to see brewers and drinkers that have access to and heartily embrace using these high-quality ingredients.
To me, this is a tremendous boon for craft beer and craft beer drinkers in general-- it's a sign of maturation of the market, with a much greater diversity of offerings all along the spectrum(s)... of cost, "intensity," quality, etc.
And I'm not sure I agree with the point about fruit beers "hiding something more beautiful underneath" either, and certainly not "just masking the flaws of the base beer." With regard to Masumoto fruited beers in particular, I've always said that I don't think the excellent fruit can take a bad beer and make it good, but that I think it can take a good beer and make it great. I know this could be inflammatory, and I hope it's obvious that that's not the reason I'm asking, but can you name any specific examples?
That said, I admit that the beers I tend to prefer in this vein are the ones with sort of a "less is more" approach-- where the fruit is dialed somewhat down in intensity, serving as more of an accent note rather than an in-your-face explosion of character-- where more of the base beer can poke through. But to each his own.
I just don't think there is any real need for a paradigm shift or a pendulum swinging back away from fruit. Virtually every brewer I can think of that is using this Masumoto fruit in their saisons also has tasty offerings of non-fruited saisons that are at least as readily available as the fruited beers (Sante Adairius, Cellador Ales, Homage, Highland Park, Monkish, Resident...) Arguably not Modern Times, now that I think about it. But that's a pretty good hit rate of delicious, non-fruited saisons, if you ask me.
Very curious to hear other people's thoughts on this. Is this a commonly-shared sentiment, that fruit beers are somehow ruining other beers?