first i gotta say thanks to my wife who made this brew day possible. a lot of my equipment came as a gift from her and she helped (a lot) in the actual brew day since my back is hurt. jaydogg...i feel your pain. i won't be brewing for a while after this either cause i'll be getting back surgery.
i couldn't figure out how to post pics inbetween my typing, so i'll just post all hte pics at the bottom.
BLUF: everything went ok except that i didn't get as much boil-off as i anticipated. i used a very precise form of measurement called a wag to determine that i would have 3 gallons of boil off after a 2 hr boil, but i only boiled off 1 gallon. more on this later.
overall, the 2.5 gallon DFH 120 clone brew day wasn't that much different than a normal 5 gallon brew day. for a 120 clone, the proportions were the same as a normal 5 gallon brew. i had 10 pounds of grain and 6oz of pellet hops. the main difference was that i planned on boiling for 2 hrs and only coming away with 3.5 gallons of wort. this was supposed to bring me somewhere around 1.100 for an O.G. (prior to adding any sugar which would eventually bring up my O.G. (adjusted) to 1.174)
so the first picture is the giant bowl of hops. i took all 6oz of hops and gently mixed them in a bowl. one day we'll invent smell-o-vision and it will be totally worth it, because my kitchen smelled amazing all day. then i measured them into 4.25 gram amounts to make 40 boil additions (once every 3 minutes).
(SKIP THIS IF YOU DON'T CARE FOR THE MATH: there are approx 28.35 grams in every ounce. so my 6 ozs of hops was equal to approx 170 grams. divide that by 40 gives you 4.25 grams of hops. 120 minutes divided by 3 minutes is 40, so that's how i got 40 hop additions....it's as close as i could come to "continuous hopping". i had a long philosophical discussion about this with my wife in which she asked me if it really mattered whether the last 2 hop additions went in together or whether i HAD to put them in separated by exactly 3 minutes. the answer is yes. they have to be separated. i'm a lover of math and so i explained it to her with a calculus example. you COULD estimate the area under a curve by putting 2 medium sized boxes underneath and calling it good (aroma box and bittering box). but the smaller you make those boxes, the closer your estimate is to the ACTUAL area under the curve, or the closer you are to ACTUAL continuous hopping. ....that may have gone way off base from this post...)
so you can see the picture of my scale reading 4 grams. unfortunately my scale doesn't do tenths or hundredths of grams, so i did the best i could. the third pic shows you what 40 hop additions looks like.
the next pic is the mash paddle i made. i've used it only one other time and i have to be honest that it is really more for show for me than anything else. it takes a lot longer to clean properly than a stainless spoon and it's actually harder to use in the mash than the spoon. however, i took a long time to make the spoon and i think it looks cool, so i used it.
i recently read john palmer's "how to brew" and so i've started to be a little better at my mash calculations. there is, however, a loooong ways to go to improve upon this. on that note, if you see a reason for me changing the way i did my calculations, please comment. i am open to all critiques. i decided i wanted a lower temp and a more watery mash to create a more atennuatable beer. check spelling. lol. i mashed in with 4 gallons of 170F water (or a quarts of water to pounds of grain ratio of 1.6:1). looking back, i'll have to double check my reasoning on the ratio. maybe i would have wanted to do something like 2:1 on quarts of water to pounds of grain. any thoughts? after mixign the mash, my temp came in right at 150F which is what i was aiming for. again this was all based off jon palmer's "how to brew".
the last picture there shows the inside of my boil kettle as i was adding the first runnings.
*****i'll break the posts up into a couple different ones to make this easier.