Something else that occurs to me is that many preach the virtues of letting beer age, which I happen to agree with - but with commercial beer, everyone always raved about how much better a pint of 'fresh' Guinness tasted. I wonder what, if any, difference there is?
Well most homebrewers don't, at least wwhen starting out, do what the pros do, meaning, we usually don't pitch enough yeast, we don't ferment at the right temps, stuff like that, at least for normal grav beers. So we unintentially create the very stuff that we end up needing to bottle condition away. Though I think there's a certain level of "natural" off flavors that need to age away anyway, but that;'s just me.
There;'s a great thread about high turnover beers, but I'm having a senior moment and am having a hard time finding the thread...but basically it is about gravity of the beer, amount of yeast and temps. In an ideal world, for a "normal" grav ale, aging isn't needed...look at the hefe, for an example.
But one thing to realize Guiness is really not much stronger than any BMC, it's NOT a high gravity beer. Even the pro micros do DO give their beer the time it needs. Look at all the stone releases that they encourage us to do vertical tastings. I'm buzzing right now on a bottle of stone 13th anniversary, and it is an amazing beer.
I say it alot, but I think this really only is an issue for new brewers. When you have a pipleline, you have various beers at different levels of the journey...If you have 2-3 beers going at a time, you're not going to sweat a beer that needs 6 weeks, or 6 months to come online, you are going to have plenty of other beers to keep your tastebuds busy.