tockeyhockey
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jul 5, 2006
- Messages
- 71
- Reaction score
- 0
the_bird said:Racking to a secondary is a lot less work than bottling. I'd rack and give it the full two weeks, then take a sample. If it's drinkable, go ahead and bottle at that point - if not, then come back here, we'll probably tell you to drink it anyway but you *might* decide then to dump it. Even if it works out well, it's not going to taste GREAT after two weeks in the secondary, but you should be able to get enough of a sense then whether it truly is ruined.
If you end up having to dump it, much better to have only spent the time to move it to secondary than to have bottled.
OK, I want to back up a second and ask the experts - what SHOULD he have done when his yeast was thrown away? Obviously, he should have had more dry yeast around, that's lesson 1. Would it have been better, though, to have sealed up the wort WITHOUT pitching the bread yeast - knowing the risk of contamination - then getting the right yeast the next day? Would that have been better than the bread yeast?
i know it's not what i "should" do, but i'm going to put it straight into bottles this weekend. that way, i free up valuable space for new batches. i have friends coming into town at the end of the summer and i want to make sure that i have beer for them to drink. but i also don't want to "totally" waste this batch. i don't see the point in having what is probably bad beer take up valuable fermentation space in my cramped brewing headquarters.
rules be damned -- i'm bottling it this weekend! i'm having a crab fest, so my guests will be switching from natty boh to my home brew and back. wonderbrau is bound to look good in comparison.