RandalG
Well-Known Member
Just poured this one for my after work. Love this recipe!
![]()
Mine didn't turn out as red as yours. I followed the recipe but cut the batch in half. Do you think that's why there's a difference?

Just poured this one for my after work. Love this recipe!
![]()
Mine didn't turn out as red as yours. I followed the recipe but cut the batch in half. Do you think that's why there's a difference?
![]()
Not the best picture, taken with phone, but here's my partial extract version of BM's OctoberFAST, thanks for the recipe:
![]()
So this is a bit of a noob question I'm sure. I just finished reading the entire thread and I noticed something mentioned I don't think I ever read in Palmers how to brew. Maybe it just something you learn over time...in which case I want to learn it now!
Why the emphasis on acheiving a FG above 1.015? Is this to emphasize the malty flavour of this beer?
I also ask because I just brewed your Munich Helles and I was under the impression I should have had a more malty beer than say one of my Pilsners. It's FG was 1.009 using Notty fermented at 68 degrees for 3 weeks. I notice that it has a maltier profile but the fruity esters are definitly more dominate than the malt. It almost tastes exactly like my previous Pils.
I'm trying to figure out where I went wrong to make sure when I brew this OktoberFAST it won't end up with those same Fruity Esters that dominate the Maltiness. I must have a Malty beer!
I think it could either be the yeast I used or I should have ended up with a high FG....or combination of the two?
As for the yeast I assume s-04 is a lower attenuation yeast?
I just brewed an Octoberfast 06/13/2010 (OG 1.059) w/Safale 04. Do you see any potential drawbacks in brewing a Tits-Up IIPA and pitching on the yeast cake on 06/27/2010?