You'll be shocked to learn that most IPA is indeed not brewed for consumption in India.
No, It's brewed for consumption in Indiana.:rockin:
You'll be shocked to learn that most IPA is indeed not brewed for consumption in India.
what's next, an Imperial Mild?
I'm a noob among snobs myself, but I'm pretty sure "double" is synonymous with "Imperial."
This is what the BJCP has to say about it all:
http://www.bjcp.org/2008styles/style14.php#1c
I had to do a double take of this thread... I thought my post was deleted, but then I realized, you made a separate thread out of your whining in another post...
https://www.homebrewtalk.com/f13/dipa-hop-schedule-147341/
Your latest pet peeve is over 3 weeks old.. get over it...
You even used the same tired ass diaper "joke" from your last post.
<edit>Handle pasted the same thing I pasted in my original post in the other thread.. sorry, didn't see you posting that</edit>
Okay. Really, who gives a rats ass. Say it how you want.
Fine, you ARE wrong. As has been pointed out, "Imperial" is an even more arbitrary label than "Double", taken simply from the fact that an Imperial Stout is a big stout. There is no such thing as a traditional Imperial IPA, it's a modern invention without a clear established name, so calling it "Double" is perfectly correct.
Really, you need to get over yourself.
While we are at it, how about a beer labeled Black IPA? There are a few I've ran into.
A black, pale ale? Just doesn't seem right. Why not IDA (India Dark Ale)?
OH So it is exactly twice the hops and twice the malt? LOL. I have been over it, where the heck are you?
Read passedpawn's last post in the thread he linked to. With that in mind, "Double" is going to be more traditionally appropriate than "Imperial".
Saying that calling it Double means it has to have exactly twice the malt and hops is beyond laughable. If that's the position you're taking, it's not even worth really not even worth discussing. Are you going to be whining about dopplebocks next?
If I brewed a pale ale with double everything, I would not call it a double pale ale.
I am just saying that the DOUBLE referred originally to the "II".
Well, if that is all you are saying, then you need to accept that you are wrong. The II thing would be a plausible guess (if one had to guess), but facts don't back it up. Double refers to ingredients, not letters.I am just saying that the DOUBLE referred originally to the "II".
Just because a bunch of people say "irregardless" doesn't make it a word.
Those of you who are pissed over this make me laugh!
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/irregardless said:Main Entry: ir·re·gard·less
Pronunciation: \ˌir-i-ˈgärd-ləs\
Function: adverb
Etymology: probably blend of irrespective and regardless
Date: circa 1912
nonstandard : regardless
usage Irregardless originated in dialectal American speech in the early 20th century. Its fairly widespread use in speech called it to the attention of usage commentators as early as 1927. The most frequently repeated remark about it is that “there is no such word.” There is such a word, however. It is still used primarily in speech, although it can be found from time to time in edited prose. Its reputation has not risen over the years, and it is still a long way from general acceptance. Use regardless instead.
Just because a bunch of people say "irregardless" doesn't make it a word.
Those of you who are pissed over this make me laugh!
You are probably the only one overly passionate about this. I am guessing that many of the responders, like me, are just killing time waiting for a boil to finish. Oatmeal stout, baby. Double.
While we are at it, how about a beer labeled Black IPA? There are a few I've ran into.
A black, pale ale? Just doesn't seem right. Why not IDA (India Dark Ale)?
First. In my book snob generally equates to ass hat who thinks he knows more about beer than he/she actually does. See my blog for my feelings about beer snobbery and how it makes you look like an idiot every time.
Second. What is an Imperial beer? Why is it imperial? If you are talking about Imperial IPA, why is that imperial? What is Imperial about a beer style created on the west coast of the US?
Is IIPA taking over the beer world? Was it commissioned by an Emperor, Empress, etc? Is California and Empire?
No. Russian Imperial stout was a style made specifically for the Emperor, or Czar, of Russia, and for a time truly was an imperial beer. Because that beer was a bigger version of a stout, people started associating imperial with any big style of a regular beer. Hence, IIPA. It is completely arbitrary. ... Just like a DIPA. In fact, I think double makes 100% more sense because it at lease suggests the beer is bigger or double the original style of beer. While it does not mean it is literally twice the hops etc. at least it shows the meaning and intention of the beer.
Or maybe a beer dead set on the subservience of other beers makes more sense...
Either way, beer snobs rile my feathers.
Creepy. You literally took the words right out of my mouth.
+100