"Hopping" a beer in Budweiser land is a term meaning something other than adding real Hops.
I would like to see some defendable facts and sources with regard to that one......?
"Hopping" a beer in Budweiser land is a term meaning something other than adding real Hops.
If you brew you should know better..... you're falling for that Craft beer is holier that BMC bull****, that's just as bad.
BMC is no more or less "natural" then craft brewing, or homebrewing.
Have you ever made hop tea? Have you ever steeped some hops in 130 degree water and run them through a french press and added that to your beer at bottling time? Or soaked them in vodka? That's the extraction process...It's still extracting the hop oils FROM REAL HOPS.
There many craft brewers, and a few homebrewers on this very site who have used hop extracts.
I guess you also boycott Lagunitus then...they use hop extracts in their CRAFT BEERS. As also does Russian River in Eldar the younger.
I've been working with nitrogen cavitation for hop extraction myself.
The CO2 extraction process offers complete extraction of virtually all of the essential bittering and aroma components in fresh hops, leaving behind only the leafy plant material. These easy to use canned extracts include practically everything a brewer would want from a hop, without adding spent hops to the trub pile.
They are 100% Natural with no chemical modifications.
The benefits of BSG Hop Extracts include:
Varietal character preserved
Consistent bittering
Increased hop utilization
Money saving
Increased kettle yield
Space saving
I had a brew that needed another hop addition and wish I would have know about making an extract at kegging time. Probably would have been the better choice than dry hopping.
I wish the foodbabe would die in a fire. Specifically, a GMO, free range, cage free, totalitarian free, shade free, conflict free, equal wage for all, organic, fire.
Or freeze it and place the suspended DHMO into a highly alcoholic solution....I prefer bourbon for that myself.![]()
So to be an organic fire, would that mean it could only be started by lighting?![]()
My concern for GMO has less to do with human consumption, and more of a concern for non-modified plants that are usually categorized as "heirloom" because they are grown less due to their genetic "inferiority" or lack of appeal. These "super plants" are often times more drought tolerant, have thicker cell walls to resist insects, mold, diseases, etc. They are designed to sell in supermarkets because of their color, and last long distances without bruising. There are non-GM plants that are selected for these qualities as well, and the culmination of both forces tends to push out the "inferior" plants. In VA we have a number of farms and nurseries that are keeping these heirloom plants in production so that people can enjoy their unique flavors and colors.
Additionally, many GMO seeds are patented. They can cross-polinate nearby farms and ruin their crops by causing them to seed these new GM plants. Larger farm companies and GMO producers will even sue for crops. For example:
Monsanto vs Farmer
"It does not matter how a farmer, a forester, or a gardeners seed or plants become contaminated with GMOs; whether through cross pollination, pollen blowing in the wind, by bees, direct seed movement or seed transportation, the growers no longer own their seeds or plants under patent law, they becomes Monsantos property"
Pre-Disclaimer ... Im not taking sides, just making an observation ...
Regarding GMOs: arent most of the people not believing scientists when they say GMOs are safe the same people that say global warming is real because science tells us its real?
The real concern here is that all of the beers listed contain DHMO. I am taken aback that this reputable news site would not even list it!
"Dihydrogen Monoxide (DHMO) is a colorless and odorless chemical compound, also referred to by some as Dihydrogen Oxide, Hydrogen Hydroxide, Hydronium Hydroxide, or simply Hydric acid. Its basis is the highly reactive hydroxyl radical, a species shown to mutate DNA, denature proteins, disrupt cell membranes, and chemically alter critical neurotransmitters. The atomic components of DHMO are found in a number of caustic, explosive and poisonous compounds such as Sulfuric Acid, Nitroglycerine and Ethyl Alcohol." ~DHMrg
"What are some uses of Dihydrogen Monoxide?"~DHMrg
"in the production of beer by all the major beer distributors"~DHMrg
Everything on this list is being wrongfully targeted. It's just another article saying anything with GMOs is poison without providing any form of scientific evidence. Reminds me of the foodbabe article:
https://www.homebrewtalk.com/f14/alarmist-article-bmc-no-listed-evidence-but-possible-interesting-points-421992/
probably because it is listed as a source
A great response from brewers about that article seems to apply to most points in this one as well:
http://maureenogle.com/maureen-ogle/2013/08/18/whats-in-your-beer-or-the-dangers-of-dumbassery
You misspelled genetically...
Sent from my C5155 using Home Brew mobile app
I understand there is a difference in method, control, and timeframe, but youre kidding yourself if you think cross breeding and selective breeding dont alter plant genetics. Less risk of mutant zombie sunflowers maybe, but altered genes happen in both cases.No offense meant, but -1000. That is not "genetic modification". Growers know this. Breeders know this. Agricultural scientists definitely know this.
If you're a "But THAT'S Wikipedia!" person, we can find a more impressive source (not to be derisive, but this is in HS textbooks). Suffice it to say that is not from an anti-GMO or pro-GMO website.
But now that you mention it I do think we should "genetically modify" certain antivaxers.
Sent from my tablet
I understand there is a difference in method, control, and timeframe, but youre kidding yourself if you think cross breeding and selective breeding dont alter plant genetics. Less risk of mutant zombie sunflowers maybe, but altered genes happen in both cases.
I don' t know how credible that website is considering they are trying to blame school shootings on DHMO
" What is the link between Dihydrogen Monoxide and school violence?
A recent stunning revelation is that in every single instance of violence in our country's schools, including infamous shootings in high schools in Denver and Arkansas, Dihydrogen Monoxide was involved. In fact, DHMO is often very available to students of all ages within the assumed safe confines of school buildings. None of the school administrators with which we spoke could say for certain how much of the substance is in use within their very hallways. "
Im sure they stuff is dangerous but come on, correlation doesn't imply causation.
You know Dihydrogen Monoxide is H2O, right?