• Please visit and share your knowledge at our sister communities:
  • If you have not, please join our official Homebrewing Facebook Group!

    Homebrewing Facebook Group

2015 Bourbon County releases

Homebrew Talk

Help Support Homebrew Talk:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Those check-ins were from the media event yesterday afternoon where they premiered the Grit & Grain film series, not at the festival.
 
Those check-ins were from the media event yesterday afternoon where they premiered the Grit & Grain film series, not at the festival.

Ahhh, good. Less bias then.



giphy.gif
 


Story time for #newmoney:

Prior to the InBev buyout (Spring/Summer 2011), all BCBS bottles were labeled as 13%. Why? Because it was close enough. GI didn't care how accurate they were with the number and figured blend to blend would end up about there. Because labels may need to be ordered well before a "final" measurement is taken (i.e., bottling time), it was easier to toss a simple, round number on the labels and not worry about it.

When InBev bought them, though, the kibosh was put on that. Weights and Measures and federal oversight is much more harsh for the big boys than the small ones. So suddenly, with the 2011 release and KH, GI had to start getting more specific with that number.

Source for this? John Hall at the KH release. He was walking around in the Clybourn Brewpub and talking to people. When he stopped by my buddy and mine's table, I asked about how the transition was going. He went into a spiel about how more bureaucratic the numbers needed to be.

So anything on a label prior to 2011 was ********. Did 2011 have a higher actual ABV than 2010? What about 2009 against this year's? The answer is: no one knows.

And I also call ******** to anyone who claims to tell the difference between this beer when labelled 13.8% and 14.4%. You're not a ******* hydrometer.
 
Story time for #newmoney:

Prior to the InBev buyout (Spring/Summer 2011), all BCBS bottles were labeled as 13%. Why? Because it was close enough. GI didn't care how accurate they were with the number and figured blend to blend would end up about there. Because labels may need to be ordered well before a "final" measurement is taken (i.e., bottling time), it was easier to toss a simple, round number on the labels and not worry about it.

When InBev bought them, though, the kibosh was put on that. Weights and Measures and federal oversight is much more harsh for the big boys than the small ones. So suddenly, with the 2011 release and KH, GI had to start getting more specific with that number.

Source for this? John Hall at the KH release. He was walking around in the Clybourn Brewpub and talking to people. When he stopped by my buddy and mine's table, I asked about how the transition was going. He went into a spiel about how more bureaucratic the numbers needed to be.

So anything on a label prior to 2011 was ********. Did 2011 have a higher actual ABV than 2010? What about 2009 against this year's? The answer is: no one knows.

And I also call ******** to anyone who claims to tell the difference between this beer when labelled 13.8% and 14.4%. You're not a ******* hydrometer.
What if you can deep throat a hydrometer?
 

Latest posts

Back
Top