freisste
Well-Known Member
First off, I've never used White Labs yeast, but I understand WLP001 is also identical...
I've heard a bunch of times that these three yeasts are the same strain and can be used interchangeably. As far as flavor goes, I've never noticed a difference, but I've also never done a true taste test.
What I really want to know is if anybody has ever used both and been disappointed in one or the other?
My story:
I used US-05 on my first batch and the beer was fantastic but gave severe headaches - I chalked it up to poor temp control leading to fusels. This first batch was "repeated" albeit a little differently (it was a slightly different all grain recipe instead of extract and I used WY1056).
Later I did two very similar pale ales and the US-05 version gave headaches where the WY1056 did not. In this case, I pitched two packs of rehydrated 05 because I didn't have time to do a starter (which I have used per yeastcalculator since early in my brewing career - about 2 years).
I just brewed another IPA (which I had REALLY high hopes for - lots of hops, interesting grain bill, water chemistry adjustments), but didn't plan well and didn't have time for a starter. Used rehydrated US-05 instead. Beer is great, headaches suck.
Why does US-05 give me headaches? I get that I didn't treat it correctly and I likely would have gotten fusels on that first batch no matter what yeast I used. But since then I have been pretty good to my yeast: good starters or I rehydrated and used cellcounts according to calculators, pitched just below fermentation temp and then slowly warmed into the fermentation range and then slowly warmed again to the top of the range when fermentation died down, used nutrient, shook and stirred a lot (no O2 system).
Does US-05 give anybody else headaches?? Is it just sensitive to something I am overlooking? Something that the "identical" WY1056 is less sensitive to? I'm at a loss.
Sorry for writing a novel.
I've heard a bunch of times that these three yeasts are the same strain and can be used interchangeably. As far as flavor goes, I've never noticed a difference, but I've also never done a true taste test.
What I really want to know is if anybody has ever used both and been disappointed in one or the other?
My story:
I used US-05 on my first batch and the beer was fantastic but gave severe headaches - I chalked it up to poor temp control leading to fusels. This first batch was "repeated" albeit a little differently (it was a slightly different all grain recipe instead of extract and I used WY1056).
Later I did two very similar pale ales and the US-05 version gave headaches where the WY1056 did not. In this case, I pitched two packs of rehydrated 05 because I didn't have time to do a starter (which I have used per yeastcalculator since early in my brewing career - about 2 years).
I just brewed another IPA (which I had REALLY high hopes for - lots of hops, interesting grain bill, water chemistry adjustments), but didn't plan well and didn't have time for a starter. Used rehydrated US-05 instead. Beer is great, headaches suck.
Why does US-05 give me headaches? I get that I didn't treat it correctly and I likely would have gotten fusels on that first batch no matter what yeast I used. But since then I have been pretty good to my yeast: good starters or I rehydrated and used cellcounts according to calculators, pitched just below fermentation temp and then slowly warmed into the fermentation range and then slowly warmed again to the top of the range when fermentation died down, used nutrient, shook and stirred a lot (no O2 system).
Does US-05 give anybody else headaches?? Is it just sensitive to something I am overlooking? Something that the "identical" WY1056 is less sensitive to? I'm at a loss.
Sorry for writing a novel.