JohnP24
Member
I have done many extract kits in the last year but now want to move up to all grain to "save money" and it seems like it is just the natural progression to move away from extract kits. Many posts recommend 15 gallon pots because inevitably you will want to brew 10 gallon batches. On the one hand I can't see myself brewing 10 gallon batches, but on the other hand a year ago I would have said that about all grain brewing.
So my dilemma is this. Do I spend the money and get the "over-the-top" 15 gallon BK for the flexibility of future 10 gallon batches? I want to go cheap but not to the point I sacrifice so much time, effort and money building a brew kettle from parts. I believe I am set on getting a pot with fittings already attached. The Blichmann kettles seem to be a fan favorite and keep their value if I decide 15 gallon is too large.
I don't own a step bit nor do I care to break several straight bits trying to drill my own starter holes. Possibly scratching the kettle every time one breaks. Plus I don't have to stress over which ball valve and thermometer to buy. IMHO Blichmann's ball valve seems to be the cat's meow in that is easily broken down for cleaning. But is this really necessary when you consider how many valves are not able to be taken apart or at least as easily? Is it really necessary to have an adjustable thermometer to view while sitting in my lazyboy waiting for the boil to begin?
I found this kettle for $240 with free shipping. It looks good to my novice eye, but has a couple negative reviews regarding the depth of the false bottom leaving about 2 gallons dead space.
If I were to use this kettle for a MLT doesn't it make sense that the false bottom supports could be bent or cut down to make less dead space? If I used the kettle for a BK then I wouldn't even worry about the false bottom and would scour the internet for a kettle without the FB to save some more money.
I don't know the value of a site gauge so the Blichmann 10 gallon Boilermaker at $329 + shipping does not seem like a better value. It does however have removable thermostat and ball valve for cleaning purposes and replacement if needed whereas the above kettle is welded.
I have read countless posts about various setups and it only seems to confuse me because everyone wishes they had bigger and better. Does it ever end? Is the guy with the 3 tier Blichmann 15 gallon Boilermaker's satisfied with a gravity feed system or is he looking for a brushed stainless steel single tier system with a March Pump, 3-220,000 BTU burners, counter flow chiller, digital thermometers, etc for $6000? OH OH OH Tim Taylor Grunts!
Does anyone ever downsize?
If only their was a one size fits all solution for every level it sure would make life easier. I suppose each beer recipe ever concocted deserves the imagination of the brewer and their personal system no matter how basic or complex!
I welcome all feedback!
So my dilemma is this. Do I spend the money and get the "over-the-top" 15 gallon BK for the flexibility of future 10 gallon batches? I want to go cheap but not to the point I sacrifice so much time, effort and money building a brew kettle from parts. I believe I am set on getting a pot with fittings already attached. The Blichmann kettles seem to be a fan favorite and keep their value if I decide 15 gallon is too large.
I don't own a step bit nor do I care to break several straight bits trying to drill my own starter holes. Possibly scratching the kettle every time one breaks. Plus I don't have to stress over which ball valve and thermometer to buy. IMHO Blichmann's ball valve seems to be the cat's meow in that is easily broken down for cleaning. But is this really necessary when you consider how many valves are not able to be taken apart or at least as easily? Is it really necessary to have an adjustable thermometer to view while sitting in my lazyboy waiting for the boil to begin?
I found this kettle for $240 with free shipping. It looks good to my novice eye, but has a couple negative reviews regarding the depth of the false bottom leaving about 2 gallons dead space.
If I were to use this kettle for a MLT doesn't it make sense that the false bottom supports could be bent or cut down to make less dead space? If I used the kettle for a BK then I wouldn't even worry about the false bottom and would scour the internet for a kettle without the FB to save some more money.
I don't know the value of a site gauge so the Blichmann 10 gallon Boilermaker at $329 + shipping does not seem like a better value. It does however have removable thermostat and ball valve for cleaning purposes and replacement if needed whereas the above kettle is welded.
I have read countless posts about various setups and it only seems to confuse me because everyone wishes they had bigger and better. Does it ever end? Is the guy with the 3 tier Blichmann 15 gallon Boilermaker's satisfied with a gravity feed system or is he looking for a brushed stainless steel single tier system with a March Pump, 3-220,000 BTU burners, counter flow chiller, digital thermometers, etc for $6000? OH OH OH Tim Taylor Grunts!
Does anyone ever downsize?
If only their was a one size fits all solution for every level it sure would make life easier. I suppose each beer recipe ever concocted deserves the imagination of the brewer and their personal system no matter how basic or complex!
I welcome all feedback!