Liquid Yeast Sux

BrewSwag 728
Homebrew Talk - Beer, Wine, Mead, & Cider Brewing Discussion Forum

Help Support Homebrew Talk - Beer, Wine, Mead, & Cider Brewing Discussion Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Firewalker11 said:
I agree with the original poster, liquid yeast sucks! Under yielding cell counts, extremely prissy temperature tolerances, mandatory starters and expensive! Have at it fanboys but I am done with them, plenty of good dry yeasts out there!
Click to expand...

im with this. I hate liquid yeast. so much work and you get less cells for more money. I made a wookie jack clone last week, and it called for WL002. nine freakin dollars......Plus the need for a 2 liter starter (OG is 1085)
The cost of the yeast and the starter was almost as much as all the other ingredients. Almost cried as i grabbed that $9 pack, with the $4 us-05 right under it. Not to mention i have a washed us-05, as well as a few others, that would be free. Liquid yeast seems a scam to me.

edit: but back to the OP, i have used many many liquid packs, and never had one be bad. Even when the LHBS was clearing out the old stock, and gave me some wyeast for free, cuz it was almost a year past the best by date. Those took of just fine
 
I have found that whenever I use liquid yeast the beer ferments fine but it seems like a very mellow ferment. Whereas when I have used dry yeast the fermentation is very aggressive and apparent. The reason I say this is, the gravity readings show when I ferment with liquid and dry they both do just fine. What I have noticed is there has been no airlock activity when using the liquid yeast, but with dry yeast there is a lot of airlock activity. I know this is not a good indication of fermentation, but I am just letting the OP know what I have experienced. The krausen ring is not as large with liquid yeast compared to the dry yeast. I have pitched with and without a starter with the liquid yeast and have the same results.

Now, do I think liquid yeast sucks? No I do not, but I am starting to wonder if I should save my money and go back to buying the dry yeast. Reading this thread is making me ponder this... Well, now that I have harvested the WLP001 California Ale Yeast and the Wyeast 1272 American Ale yeast, I will continue to use them and make starters as needed. But the next time I use dry yeast I will harvest it and try to reuse it again later too.

Any how I wanted to share what I have noticed with my experience with the two kinds of yeast and I wish the OP the best of luck! Stick with dry yeast and don't give up on this hobby just yet! Cheers!
 
Whatever floats your boat, I guess. For me I use White Labs. I have 5 strains I like that I rotate through, harvesting and reusing, so I haven't bought new in a while and offsets the cost pretty easily. Making a starter to me is just part of planning the brew, and I do love to plan. I guess I'd say it hardly qualifies as "Sux."
 
I've never had liquid yeast not work for me whether it be bought online or the LHBS but I make starters 98% of the time.
I like liquid yeasts. I make huge starters and make enough yeast to make it work out to be about $1 per beer.
Dry yeast is fine. Use what works for you and you'll be fine.
 
Nothing inherently wrong with the way any kind of yeast is packaged, but hey, more Conan for us liquid folks
 
I've had very good luck with liquid yeasts, with starters. It's really not that hard....or expensive.
Just this past weekend I broke out some ECY10 yeast that I saved from the starter the last time I used it (about 20ml, last propagated Jan 2015), and with 1 qt of free wort (AG second runnings I canned) over 2 days, it blew up in about 4 hours after pitching.
I buy 1-2 yeast packs a year, usually because it's a unique strain I need. Probably 90% of mine come from saved starters. Washing is soooo much more of a hassle.
I've used dry a few times as well, but lag times are significant in comparison. Nothing wrong with the beer it made!
 
jleiii said:
I've had very good luck with liquid yeasts, with starters. It's really not that hard....or expensive.

Just this past weekend I broke out some ECY10 yeast that I saved from the starter the last time I used it (about 20ml, last propagated Jan 2015), and with 1 qt of free wort (AG second runnings I canned) over 2 days, it blew up in about 4 hours after pitching.

I buy 1-2 yeast packs a year, usually because it's a unique strain I need. Probably 90% of mine come from saved starters. Washing is soooo much more of a hassle.

I've used dry a few times as well, but lag times are significant in comparison. Nothing wrong with the beer it made!
Click to expand...


"Expensive" is relative. Not everyone saves or reuses yeast. I, personally, don't yet (but I plan to, in order to save more money). Obviously in your case, you're saving a lot by splitting and saving starters.

But, with a limited budget to brew with, the difference between $3.50 and $9 can mean a lot, especially if I'm looking at a high gravity beer. For example, Double IPAs will drain my budget because hops can be pretty expensive, especially if you need a pound or so of hops for one 5 gal batch.
 
yeah, and I've even used expired liquid yeast that the LHBS gave me for free (since they couldn't ethically sell it)...just made a starter, stepped it up to lager-level cell counts and it made amazing beer. on the other hand, the dry yeast I used in a similar recipe turned out pretty sulfury.
I've had experiences with both that could be used to argue that one is better than the other...
dry yeast is definitely cheaper, but when I'm putting as much effort in to making a great beer recipe that would retail commercially for 3x, I don't mind spending another $3 to get it closer.
 
SeraW said:
Whatever floats your boat, I guess. For me I use White Labs. I have 5 strains I like that I rotate through, harvesting and reusing, so I haven't bought new in a while and offsets the cost pretty easily. Making a starter to me is just part of planning the brew, and I do love to plan. I guess I'd say it hardly qualifies as "Sux."
Click to expand...

Whoa! there pardner! The OP was about the viability etc of liquid yeast, reusing is a whole other discussion and I have four liquid bases yeasts I saved and use from time to time but buying new yeast for a brewday? No thank you...
 
Vaginal yeast!

Wait...

Seriously, several hundred batches under my belt, probably less than 10 with dry yeast, the rest with liquid, and I've only ONE dead vial, which was shipped cross country in the middle of the hottest heatwave on record and arrived untouchably hot (the last time I ever ordered liquid yeast during the summer, have done so exactly once since during winter for a strain I couldn't get locally).

Sorry mate, but it sounds like user error on your part.
 
Qhrumphf said:
Vaginal yeast!

Wait...

Seriously, several hundred batches under my belt, probably less than 10 with dry yeast, the rest with liquid, and I've only ONE dead vial, which was shipped cross country in the middle of the hottest heatwave on record and arrived untouchably hot (the last time I ever ordered liquid yeast during the summer, have done so exactly once since during winter for a strain I couldn't get locally).

Sorry mate, but it sounds like user error on your part.
Click to expand...

Um, scrotal yeast actually...
 
Out of 50+ batches I have had exactly one failed liquid yeast pack. After a solid week it finally showed a tiny bit of activity. I repitched, and would have sooner if I had that yeast strain readily available.
 
I am in a location that a LHBS is not readily available. Therefore I rely on the Internet and delivery service. I cannot control shipping and handling conditions. I guess it is my fault because I could move but that's not real practical based on my primary source of income. The rant was based on ANOTHER unsuccessful reviving attempt of dead or severely deficient liquid yeast. Not sure if I could improve the odds.

So 92% success rate vs 100% success rate. I realize my position is unpopular and folks tend to view a dissenting vote from a narrow perspective. No yeast starter or smack pack, just open, hydrate in 1 cup of warm water for 15 min and pitch! Way easier and I cannot tell a difference in flavor, body, etc.... As someone said above -more liquid yeast for you. Have fun!
 
brewbama said:
I am in a location that a LHBS is not readily available. Therefore I rely on the Internet and delivery service. I cannot control shipping and handling conditions. I guess it is my fault because I could move but that's not real practical based on my primary source of income. The rant was based on ANOTHER unsuccessful reviving attempt of dead or severely deficient liquid yeast. Not sure if I could improve the odds.

So 92% success rate vs 100% success rate. I realize my position is unpopular and folks tend to view a dissenting vote from a narrow perspective. No yeast starter or smack pack, just open, hydrate in 1 cup of warm water for 15 min and pitch! Way easier and I cannot tell a difference in flavor, body, etc.... As someone said above -more liquid yeast for you. Have fun!
Click to expand...

Is it how you're storing it that contributes to the yeast death? Most places wil include ice packs so right now would be the best time to order yeast for summer brewing. Maybe stick with one or two liquid yeasts, harvest from starters and store them in sanitary conditions below 40F. Where was this "dead or severely deficient liquid yeast" from and how was it shipped and cared for?
 
brewbama said:
I am in a location that a LHBS is not readily available. Therefore I rely on the Internet and delivery service. I cannot control shipping and handling conditions. I guess it is my fault because I could move but that's not real practical based on my primary source of income. The rant was based on ANOTHER unsuccessful reviving attempt of dead or severely deficient liquid yeast. Not sure if I could improve the odds.

So 92% success rate vs 100% success rate. I realize my position is unpopular and folks tend to view a dissenting vote from a narrow perspective. No yeast starter or smack pack, just open, hydrate in 1 cup of warm water for 15 min and pitch! Way easier and I cannot tell a difference in flavor, body, etc.... As someone said above -more liquid yeast for you. Have fun!
Click to expand...

So what you're saying-

It's not liquid yeast that sucks. It's where you live that sucks...

Seriously. I'm not suggesting that you should move. But don't blame it on the yeast.

My apartment doesn't allow dogs! Dogs suck!

Seriously though, it takes a lot to legit kill yeast. Usually you can coax it back up from sequential starters, just like harvesting from a bottle. Is it always worth it? Maybe not. Maybe dry yeast is a better choice given your circumstances. But again, don't blame the yeast for that.
 
Qhrumphf said:
So what you're saying-

It's not liquid yeast that sucks. It's where you live that sucks...

Seriously. I'm not suggesting that you should move. But don't blame it on the yeast.

My apartment doesn't allow dogs! Dogs suck!

Seriously though, it takes a lot to legit kill yeast. Usually you can coax it back up from sequential starters, just like harvesting from a bottle. Is it always worth it? Maybe not. Maybe dry yeast is a better choice given your circumstances. But again, don't blame the yeast for that.
Click to expand...

True. There are dog people and cat people. Dog people think cats suck. Cat people think dogs suck. Cat people think dogs are not worth it. Dog people think cats are not worth it. I came to a point the other day that I decided it's not worth it - even though I've had a 90+% success rate. After daze of trying to coax liquid yeast back to life that I paid over $6 bucks for, I decided I'd go with 100% sure thing. Cheaper and Easier. ...and makes great beer.
 
It's funny, because I am the polar opposite. In 3 years of brewing and 50+ batches, I've used dry yeast a handful of times, and I've been gravely disappointed every single time. One of my first kits was a NB hefeweizen with dry yeast that neither tasted good or even remotely resembled a hefeweizen. I credit the awful dry yeast for that dumper.

In contrast, I've been very pleased with 95% of my liquid yeast selection. I've resurrected smack packs that were 3-6 months out of date with good results. Liquid yeast does reinforce good yeast management techniques, so if you can demonstrate yeast harvesting and propagation techniques, there's no limits. And guess what? That's what commercial brewers do.

Graduate to liquid yeast and eventually you'll be able to propagate bottle dregs for even more variety. It's worth the effort.
 
Well I almost always use liquid yeast that is long since expired.
I don't even care about the date anymore.
I just make a small starter and have always gotten good activity.
Taste the starter beer. Tastes fine. Pitch that mother.
Several years now, and not one unsuccessful attempt.
This is only my experience.
I have no lhbs. All of mine are shipped. I avoid this during the oppressive Oklahoma summers, but they still can get quite hot.
 

Similar threads

Zippy123
Yeast starter for pressure lager (~68 F ferm)
Replies
10
Views
774
rallenhall
rallenhall
F
Liquid yeast - am I missing something?
2 3
Replies
98
Views
3K
Gadjobrinus
Gadjobrinus
Tony B
Overbuild starter from dry yeast
Replies
8
Views
639
fluketamer
F
Tony B
Too much yeast?
Replies
1
Views
304
Tony B
Tony B
H
Yeast starter not starting
Replies
16
Views
1K
HB2112
H
CornyKegs 300

Latest posts

Back
Top