There is a lot of evidence to the contrary of what many of the scientists that tend to profit off of the climate change concept have, but much of the media and certainly all of the people who have things to gain by that concept are completely unwilling to admit that there is the possibility that humans have very little impact on global climate change.
I should have been more clear in my first post. I do actually believe that a certain amount of climate change is taking place, but I think that humans are having a negligible effect on it. I think it has a lot more to do with solar cycles, and even if there is a tie-in with carbon in the atmosphere, who is to say that global temperatures increasing didn't cause the oceans to offgas(we all know that a liquid's ability to hold dissolved gasses decreases with temperature) all of this deadly carbon into the atmosphere. And why do humans think that this type of climate and "global temperature" is the "right" one for the planet? We know that the earth has been very warm in the past without human intervention(unless dinosaurs were driving around in Excursions and Escalades). A good read - "Unstoppable Global Warming: Every 1,500 years"
The same organizations that perpetuated the "little ice age" theory years and years ago are the same organizations that seem to perpetuate global warming, and terrified many people about the hole in the ozone layer about a decade ago.