I havn't thought about "No Sparge".....I suppose that would require a large enough mash tun.....but is the efficiency going to be good?Thanks!
You would have to add about 1/3 more grain. Brewing just 5 gal batches would hardly increase your cost.
From a Promash article: The benefits (while still being debated) include a richer, maltier beer. The reasons for this seem to be the fewer tannins leached from the mash due to the lack of sparging.
No Sparge
BYO article by John Palmer
From Brewboard.com
A: The benefits of no-sparging brewing are:
* Simplicity - add water to Mash Tun, heat, add grain, wait, drain wort to boil pot
* Richer, Maltier Beer - when sparging the pH and buffering capacity of the wort usually changes, which causes more polyphenols, silicates, and tannins to be extracted, which can affect the taste of the finished beer
* pH Consistency - once you set it at the beginning of the mash it stays consistent because you donât add water
* Specific Gravity Targeting - the SG of the mash will be the SG in the boiling pot (if itâs too low just keep mashing)
* Time - itâs usually faster to do a no-sparge mash than a mash followed by a long sparge (I usually shoot for a 60-90 minute mash, but I did have one mash that took 4.5 hours to convert! crazy.gif )
* Potentially Less Equipment â since the entire mash is performed in one pot you can potentially have one big Mash Tun (pot), drain your mash into a bucket, rinse out your Mash Tun, fill it back up with the wort in your bucket and start the boil.
How did this become the first post??