I was talking with my brother about what a craft beer is. You know the drill, how craft beers are built for taste rather than profit by using a recipe geared for taste rather than stretching a dollar... That lead me to an observation.
I've looked at various recipes, ambers in particular as that's my current fav, in many places. In the recipe area here at HBT, Brewers Friend, online places of all kinds. I've noticed that a very, very high percentage of those recipes will have a majority of two row or very similar. Then, a spattering in varying percentages of the malty players such as vienna, munich, C40, C60, various roasted malts, etc designed to get the grist darker, maltier so as to make an amber.
So let me ask you guys and gals what you think is behind the prevalent use of a high percentage of two row? Diastastic (starch conversion) power? If so, won't most all base malts be at least self converting?
In tweaking a current recipe (and learning water chem) I'm using 2 lbs of two row and the remainder being vienna, munich, crystals and roasted malts. I'm getting the SRM to between 10 and 13 while no more than 19% two row. Incidentally, the ABV (assuming yeast behaves as it has been) will be about 5.25% AFTER assuming normal 40% fermentation of sugars from crystal malts)
(inhaling) soooo, why do you think a large number of peeps use high percentages of low lovibond malt when malty goodness abounds in darker, "amberer" and more flavorful malts? You know, why not use more "craft beer" worthy malts, sorta saying? The big brewers trying to save a buck use not only rice syrup, etc, but a lot of two row then a maybe a token crystal and a roasted malt to bring color and a hint of 'amberishness' to their psuedo-craft beers. Why are so many recipe submitters following suit? Am I wrong, missing something?
Is the flayva of my thinking coming through?
I've looked at various recipes, ambers in particular as that's my current fav, in many places. In the recipe area here at HBT, Brewers Friend, online places of all kinds. I've noticed that a very, very high percentage of those recipes will have a majority of two row or very similar. Then, a spattering in varying percentages of the malty players such as vienna, munich, C40, C60, various roasted malts, etc designed to get the grist darker, maltier so as to make an amber.
So let me ask you guys and gals what you think is behind the prevalent use of a high percentage of two row? Diastastic (starch conversion) power? If so, won't most all base malts be at least self converting?
In tweaking a current recipe (and learning water chem) I'm using 2 lbs of two row and the remainder being vienna, munich, crystals and roasted malts. I'm getting the SRM to between 10 and 13 while no more than 19% two row. Incidentally, the ABV (assuming yeast behaves as it has been) will be about 5.25% AFTER assuming normal 40% fermentation of sugars from crystal malts)
(inhaling) soooo, why do you think a large number of peeps use high percentages of low lovibond malt when malty goodness abounds in darker, "amberer" and more flavorful malts? You know, why not use more "craft beer" worthy malts, sorta saying? The big brewers trying to save a buck use not only rice syrup, etc, but a lot of two row then a maybe a token crystal and a roasted malt to bring color and a hint of 'amberishness' to their psuedo-craft beers. Why are so many recipe submitters following suit? Am I wrong, missing something?
Is the flayva of my thinking coming through?