HERMS vs. RIMS (electric) Pros and Cons - Page 6 - Home Brew Forums
Home Brew Forums > Home Brewing Beer > Equipment/Sanitation > HERMS vs. RIMS (electric) Pros and Cons
Sign-up To NEW HBT Article Newsletter - Brewing Articles Direct To You!

Thread Tools
Old 11-06-2010, 06:34 PM   #51
Cape Brewing
DOH!!! Stupid brewing...
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Cape Brewing's Avatar
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Norton, MA
Posts: 12,973
Liked 751 Times on 598 Posts
Likes Given: 50


I wouldn't say "never" at all... yeah, I totally agree that with today's modified malts, steps aren't the necessity they used to be but I always step my mashes that contain any significant amount of wheat. I have been doing beta glucan rests at about 100 just to keep the mash fluid and then, since I'm already down that path, I'll do a protein rest as well.

I don't do a ton of them but I wouldn't say "never" at all.

And pnh2atl... I'm not sure I understnad your question 100%.... are you asking if RIMS and HERMS systems, by their nature, are "better": for large batches?

No expert at all but I would think they would have the advantage of eliminating the stratification of temp in the mash... and the larger the mash volume, the more stratification I would think you would get.... so... my theory would be that these two systems would be better suited for larger batches.

Why the eff not... everyone else is starting a nano!!! I wanna!!! www.bogironbrewing.com

Originally Posted by paulthenurse View Post
I'm pretty much a douche in real life, too.
Cape Brewing is offline
Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2010, 05:08 PM   #52
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Georgia
Posts: 216
Liked 3 Times on 3 Posts
Likes Given: 1


I was wondering if at some point a batch gets to big for either. Or is one is better for large batches 2bbl plus lets say.

pnh2atl is offline
Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2010, 12:56 AM   #53
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Roseville, CA, California
Posts: 216
Liked 1 Times on 1 Posts


Originally Posted by dutch101st View Post
I just did a complete overhaul/rebuild of my operation:


I decided to go HERMS soley because of the scorch wort risk and my inability to do anything with electrical other than lighting myself up (mans gotta know his limits)...so building a PID was out of the question.

ALthough I do like the RIMS approach as well...
Well, leave it to me to change my mind...I am going to go with a RIMS for a while...will see how it goes. I didn't really like how my HERMS turned out, but now I am going to be able to do both here soon.

New control panel and doing PID/Temp control the way it should be done.
Kegged: AIR
Primary: AIR

On Tap: NADA
Bottled: Store baught swill

Atomic Robot Brewing- Beware the Robot Uprising!!

dutch101st is offline
Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2010, 08:54 PM   #54
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 421
Liked 5 Times on 5 Posts


With my tendency to burn things, I have been using HERMS to some degree. I have a two pot system and have been using the BK as an HLT. Of course, this presents some problems, like where to poor the liquid off to. As a result, I've been using my mixing bucket as a storage vessel, but I really do not like filling a plastic bucket with hot water. Oh yes, and I am all electric.

I have been working on improving that setup for the last few months, including changing all my fittings out to tri-clamps and adding a third bucket to the batch. However, for some reason, my mind just can't let go of using my BK as an HLT and just using my HLT as a storage vessel. Although, I think I have been convincing myself not to do that with my rebuild.

I bring all of this up to throw the combined CFC HERMS + RIMS into the mix of options here. What I am looking at doing is as follows:

* CFC between HLT and MT, two pumps, circulate both past each other.
* Depending on the rate at which the system can step up, I may add a RIMS after the CFC going back to the MT, so the RIMS is doing minimal work to increase the wort temp that last few degrees. Alternatively, I could put it before, but it seems like I would have to guess at what temp rise I could get out of the CFC and then have the RIMS raise to just before that, so after just seems simpler because I can test the temperature between the CFC and RIMS and after the RIMS and have the RIMS heat accordingly.
* All else fails, use the BK to bring an extra gallon or two up and toss it in to raise the mash temperature faster, but I doubt that would be necessary.

I know, overkill, at that point I probably should have gone to steam, but steam and pressure scare me.

So, other than the overkill and cost, I am sure someone can tell me why this is a dumb idea.

Keep in mind, I am still thinking about it, my first step here is to update my pots and go to a full three vessel setup with CFC HERMS. Then to add the RIMS as necessary.
maztec is offline
Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2012, 12:58 AM   #55
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Denver, Colorado
Posts: 302
Liked 4 Times on 3 Posts
Likes Given: 16


Interesting posts and thank you to all that have. I am in the process of having to choose RIMS or HERMS. Building an electric system is something I think I am going to do.

Thanks for all of the information.

skepace is offline
Reply With Quote

Thread Tools

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Auto-Siphon Pros and Cons madewithchicken Equipment/Sanitation 47 11-13-2013 04:02 PM
RIMS vs. HERMS alemonkey Equipment/Sanitation 46 02-14-2013 03:13 AM
DIY Mash Tuns: Pros and cons of cube vs. "gatorade" style? moxie Equipment/Sanitation 29 06-15-2010 01:40 AM
Conical or Tank fermenter... pros and cons Mirilis Equipment/Sanitation 14 06-04-2009 06:41 PM
HERMs vs. RIMs IrwinMFletcher Equipment/Sanitation 11 09-14-2008 07:29 PM

Forum Jump