Home Brew Forums > Home Brewing Beer > Lambic & Wild Brewing > Why to rack a red but not a lambic?
Thread Tools
Old 08-01-2010, 10:02 PM   #1
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
chase's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Urbana, IL
Posts: 370
Liked 2 Times on 2 Posts

Default Why to rack a red but not a lambic?

A couple times I've read that it is a good idea to rack a flanders red after primary fermentation (even if the 1 includes the bugs), but a lambic shouldn't be racked.

Anyone have a good idea of why that may be? Is there any harm to leaving a red on the 1 for the duration of the aging?

1 #1: RIS
1 #2: -
2 #1: Flanders Red (2009)
2 #2: Lambic (2009)
2 #3: Flanders Red (2010)
2 #4: Lambic (2010)
2 #5: Old Ale
chase is offline
Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2010, 11:02 PM   #2
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Washington
Posts: 841
Liked 7 Times on 7 Posts


I usually leave my reds on the cake without any issues

leaving it on the cake will tend to make it a bit funkier as the brett can utilize the cake to feed itself, removing the cake will make the beer a bit "cleaner" and will promote more acidity rather than overall complexity
ryane is offline
Reply With Quote

Thread Tools

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Sampling the Lambic ksbrain Lambic & Wild Brewing 20 08-09-2010 01:58 PM
Just tried my first lambic Sithdad Lambic & Wild Brewing 43 05-27-2010 06:18 AM
First lambic pipapat Lambic & Wild Brewing 7 05-04-2010 12:10 AM
Which wheat for a Lambic Ryan_PA Lambic & Wild Brewing 8 08-18-2009 04:52 PM
To rack or not to rack, that is the question cmdrico7812 Lambic & Wild Brewing 8 04-04-2009 02:46 PM

Forum Jump