Mikesterbrau
Member
This is my first time using a White Labs tube rather than a Wyeast smack pack. I've done a Kolsch with the Wyeast before, so that's my reference for how Kolsch yeast "should" behave. The tube I used was WLP029 with a late June 2010 "best by" date.
When I pitched the White Labs tube into my starter, it took quite a bit of shaking to get the yeast out of the bottom. It was stuck together like lumps of clay and stayed that way until I pushed the stir plate up to full power.
By brew day, after sitting in the fridge for a couple of days, the WLP029 starter had once again formed a relatively solid layer on the bottom of the starter. It took some effort, but I was able to pitch it after decanting most of the spent wort away and giving it a vigorous shake.
The Wyeast smack pack Kolsch yeast I remember as being much closer to the descriptions of Kolsch behavior - very creamy in suspension, not as flocculent, etc.
Is this just the difference between using smack packs vs tubes, or is something else likely going on?
When I pitched the White Labs tube into my starter, it took quite a bit of shaking to get the yeast out of the bottom. It was stuck together like lumps of clay and stayed that way until I pushed the stir plate up to full power.
By brew day, after sitting in the fridge for a couple of days, the WLP029 starter had once again formed a relatively solid layer on the bottom of the starter. It took some effort, but I was able to pitch it after decanting most of the spent wort away and giving it a vigorous shake.
The Wyeast smack pack Kolsch yeast I remember as being much closer to the descriptions of Kolsch behavior - very creamy in suspension, not as flocculent, etc.
Is this just the difference between using smack packs vs tubes, or is something else likely going on?