I'm afraid I'm having a repeat of this incident (MINUS the dumping this time!) https://www.homebrewtalk.com/f39/ba...ing-alcohol-can-infected-but-look-fine-86918/
This time, I am doing the AHB Cannon Ball Stout.
Austin Homebrew Supply
Just like that experience, after 3 weeks in the primary, I tasted it and it was delicious. In fact it really reminded me of Brooklyn Black Chocolate. Somewhat sweet, thick, black, lots of toasted and chocolate flavor.
Also just like that experience, I let it set 3 more weeks in a secondary (again, santizing thoroughly as I went). When I went to bottle last night (roughly the 6 week mark in total) I tasted it and it now was awful! Really the same medicinal/band aid/rubbing alcohol flavor and burn that the barleywine had. Also like that one, this looks beautiful and smells fine. Nothing odd floating in or on it. No real signs of a true infection or anything.
I realize this is a really big beer just like the barleywine and may just need aging, but two things contradict that in my mind. First, after my second attempt at the above barleywine, it tasted great right out of the secondary before bottling. Polar opposite of the first time with the bad taste. Second, where the barleywine recipe flat out states that it should age for 3+ months, this one only says 3 WEEKS, and I'm already at the 6 week mark. Makes me think more aging won't do much.
I guess the only true test is one of time. I will crack one open in a month or so, and if it's still bad, try one the next month until 4 months or so go by and I give up on it at that point. If this batch is actually bad, it makes me want to stop using secondaries since this has happened twice now. I really like how it clears and settles down all the trub and junk in these thick, high OG beers with lots of yeast byproduct and whatnot, but this is potentially getting ridiculous and expensive. I'll report back when I try one in a month or so, but I wanted to get any of your thoughts in the meantime. Hey...at least I didn't dump this one!
This time, I am doing the AHB Cannon Ball Stout.
Austin Homebrew Supply
Just like that experience, after 3 weeks in the primary, I tasted it and it was delicious. In fact it really reminded me of Brooklyn Black Chocolate. Somewhat sweet, thick, black, lots of toasted and chocolate flavor.
Also just like that experience, I let it set 3 more weeks in a secondary (again, santizing thoroughly as I went). When I went to bottle last night (roughly the 6 week mark in total) I tasted it and it now was awful! Really the same medicinal/band aid/rubbing alcohol flavor and burn that the barleywine had. Also like that one, this looks beautiful and smells fine. Nothing odd floating in or on it. No real signs of a true infection or anything.
I realize this is a really big beer just like the barleywine and may just need aging, but two things contradict that in my mind. First, after my second attempt at the above barleywine, it tasted great right out of the secondary before bottling. Polar opposite of the first time with the bad taste. Second, where the barleywine recipe flat out states that it should age for 3+ months, this one only says 3 WEEKS, and I'm already at the 6 week mark. Makes me think more aging won't do much.
I guess the only true test is one of time. I will crack one open in a month or so, and if it's still bad, try one the next month until 4 months or so go by and I give up on it at that point. If this batch is actually bad, it makes me want to stop using secondaries since this has happened twice now. I really like how it clears and settles down all the trub and junk in these thick, high OG beers with lots of yeast byproduct and whatnot, but this is potentially getting ridiculous and expensive. I'll report back when I try one in a month or so, but I wanted to get any of your thoughts in the meantime. Hey...at least I didn't dump this one!