grimzella said:your too easy. don't you know.. this is why we have over 12 pages of argument. its fun. and your funny.
YOUR posts and horrible grammar suggest that YOU'RE ignorant. But hey, it's all in fun.
grimzella said:your too easy. don't you know.. this is why we have over 12 pages of argument. its fun. and your funny.
Unicellular reproduction is a bit easier to study and experiment with than purely theoretical universal origin astrophysics. So I would say this is a poor analogy, to put it mildly.
This is a basic, well established concept that isn't up for debate. It's mind boggling how difficult it is for some people to accept it.
grimzella said:now now g-string. we are talking about yeast here. no need to take shots at someones disability
grimstuff said:I'm decided. I no longer believe in the science of rehydrating dry yeast, just to piss off left-brainers who can't FRDWHAHB.
RDWHAHB is fine if you're just starting out in the hobby.
It's silly and counter-productive to one's advancement as a brewer once you get a bit of a clue as to what you're doing.
There's a difference between developing your craft and rabidly taking your last stand on an internet thread about dry yeast hydration and getting all upset just because some people don't give as much of a s*** as you do.
The people that don't care don't post asking for advice. The people that do might be interested in the science behind dry yeast hydration. If you don't care, stay out of the argument.
I'm only interested in irritating tight-assed individuals who have no concept of proportion.
Sounds like you're only here to troll the thread and not make any positive contribution.
Once again, those who cannot argue the science intelligently will fall back on small-minded tactics. It all fits together if you think about it.
Enter your email address to join: