Yeah, the whole "efficiency" subject is still not clear to me. I've read a couple of brewing books and still don't completely understand it.
I'm sure I will after I get my first AG batch under my belt. Hopefully this week!
For my mash, I use 1.3-1.5 quarts of water per pound of grain. If that's 29.6 quarts, like on Sunday, I use 7.5 gallons. Then I sparge up to my boil volume, so that could be 7.3 gallons or 7.932 gallons- it doesn't matter as long as I hit my boil volume. Does that make sense?
The recipe doesn't really give water amounts, only the water amounts someone used in their system.
I may have more dead space under my false bottom, and you might brew in a bag with less absorption loss, so it's not going to be the same for both brewers even if the recipe they use is the same. I'd use more water than the BIAB guy who squeezed his bag out.
Does that make sense? The easiest thing to do is work backwards. Say you need 6.75 gallons of wort in the kettle because your boil-off is 1.5 gallons per hour. So it doesn't matter how much water you use to get there- BIAB guy might need 7(?) gallons while I'll have more losses so I'll need 8 gallons of water at the start.
The best thing to do on a brewday when you don't really know how much you'll "lose" to absorption and boil off is to have more water ready and on hand. If you're doing a traditional mash, using 1.3-1.5 quarts of water per pound of grain is a great place to start. Then either sparge up to your volume (fly sparging) or drain your first runnings, and measure those. Then use however much water in the sparge that you need to reach your boil volume. You may want to know you have about 7 gallons of water to start with, but actually need more or less than that.
Makes sense. So in other words, focus on hitting the boil volume target. Correct?
Enter your email address to join: