Without searching this entire thread, are the fifty pound sack people in TN?
I just paid $58 plus the ridiculous 10% sales tax from the LHBS for Briess 2 row which I thought was very high. Commodity prices are going up though so it would stand to reason that barley prices will go up steeply.
I know the LHBS you speak of as I had them quote my bulk grain order (I buy grain once a year). A 50lb sack of Briess 2-row was $58.
For that very reason, I am driving to Goodlettesville from Oak Ridge this afternoon to pick up my order. I'm much more than covering the cost of diesel to run out there in the savings I'm getting.
Anybody buy any hops from them yet? I can get bulk grain much cheaper locally, but the hops prices don't look all that bad with the shipping included.
Check hops direct as well. They (50#) didn't have some of the stuff I needed (Amarillo).
If they don't have it on one side of the house they will have it on the other side, Rebel Brewer.
Yeah but they aren't a good price (2.99 per oz). Then again, I think I snarfed up the last pound bag of amarillo at hopsdirect, just checked back and after my order they have updated the website to indicate no more amarillo until the fall/winter. Eeek!
Glad I grabbed a pound!
In walks the guy from Illinois...I can't think of a tax we DON'T have...we pay all three you mentioned. Even got a 2% increase on income tax...
sorry, back to the conversation...
Anybody buy any hops from them yet? I can get bulk grain much cheaper locally, but the hops prices don't look all that bad with the shipping included.
I was hoping for Target, but the Willamette should substitute nicely in my upcoming blonde ale.
According to the how to brew book Northdown is a sub for target, but they don't carry that one at this point. I looked and Northdown and subs are target and Northern Brewer. I guess you could possibly sub Northern Brewer which they do carry for 15.49
Awesome idea, but their recent price increases basically kill it.
That is what I am starting with. I'll be putting in a hops order today. A pound of Saaz and a pound of Willamette for $30, shipped, is a price I just haven't been able to beat, looking around online. That is $0.83 per pound average to my door. I was hoping for Target, but the Willamette should substitute nicely in my upcoming blonde ale.
FYI, at farmhousebrewingsupply.com you would have paid $29.15 for that order.
It's not, and if you are closer to Forrest, you are subsidizing his customers who are farther away. Not to get preachy, but this methodology does not result in an efficient use of resources in the economy and why I'm not a fan of flat or free shipping. Charge a reasonable markup and actual shipping and everyone wins, well, other than the guy up in Alaska who's shipping you are paying for.
So if you lost money on that order you have to make it up somewhere else. That's my whole point.
I'm making no assumptions other than that what you said is true, that you lost significant money on a sale related to shipping costs. Obviously you need to make money to stay in business, so by losing money on one sale you will need to make up for it on another. Someone is subsidizing someone else because you are charging two people the same for something that has much different costs to you.
Understand?
Basically the "free" shipping is not free in that the costs are spread over the other products throughout the store, thereby raising their prices ever so slightly.
This is false based on the assumption that all stores make the same margin and that they have to charge more to make it all back to the same margin.
The shipping is free if you were going to buy a product at store xyz and they charge $110 plus $12 shipping, But instead you find it at store AHS for $110 with free shipping. You recieved free shipping not "free shipping". Or if store xyz has it on on sale for $100 plus $12 shipping and you ask store AHS to match the price and you still get free shipping, you are getting free shipping not "free shipping". Store xyz just makes a higher margin than store ahs. Just like Walmart makes 3.6% margin and Target makes 4.2% margin. Walmart is not "making it up somewhere", they just make less margin.
Forrest
Maybe we need a new thread entitled, how homebrewers can get bulk grains for less.
I mean, we all know the prices the maltsters charge for bulk orders based on the group buy sheets - roughly $25 for a 55lb sack of 2-row plus $3-4 in allocated shipping. I get that freight shipping by pallet will always be cheaper than residential shipping. But that's still a long way off from the $70-80 shipped sacks we're seeing from the online vendors.
I run a small business... Forest is saying that he does not add the cost of shipping into his price..
So free shipping is not part of the final price..
It is a part of his cost though.. Because of that he is making less profit on shipped orders.
If you want to think of shipping as included into the price then the "real" price of the product is less than stated.
Bottom line.. Buy what ever costs less
Product + shipping
Wow, at least do some research before posting. You cannot get 2-row for $25(closer to $30). That shipping price is only valid if you get a full 42 bag palette. Then you have to provide a commercial address, or the shipping doubles.
The shipping goes up sharply if you want a call ahead or a liftgate. Then you have to be there to unload the truck. Then you have to drive the grains home(gas expense).
Whereas you can order a sack of 2-row form these guys for $59 delivered. Not such a big stretch for someone who does this for a living.
_
Maybe you should go back and read what I wrote before commenting. I said ROUGHLY $25 and I acknowledged that the allocated shipping rate on a pallet can't be expected to apply to a single sack residential shipment.
There is exactly one item that is $59 shipped on that site. Most everything else is in the 60's or 70's.
Enter your email address to join: