 |
|
11-28-2012, 03:18 AM
|
#1
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 12
|
I'm about to order my second kit, I see lots of options for different yeast:
1). Dry
2) premium dry yeast
3) wyeast activator
4) white labs vial
What are the major differences and what would everyone recommend and why?
Thanks for any responses!
|
|
|
11-28-2012, 07:55 AM
|
#2
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Croatia
Posts: 870
Liked 32 Times on 32 Posts Likes Given: 11
|
I think your major doubt is whether to use dry or liquid yeast.
Generally, liquid yeast provides more strains so you can brew more beer styles, but it comes in less amount than dry yeast, so you'll probably have to propagate it in starter, depending on batch size and OG.
|
|
|
11-28-2012, 10:48 AM
|
#3
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: !, !
Posts: 917
Liked 42 Times on 38 Posts Likes Given: 3
|
What kit and where are you ordering from?
|
|
|
11-28-2012, 11:00 AM
|
#4
|
|
Feedback Score: 1 reviews
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Batavia, Oh
Posts: 1,532
Liked 48 Times on 34 Posts Likes Given: 8
|
dry yeast is most likely going to be a 6 gram packet of coopers, muntons, or muntons gold. In my opinion I would pass on these yeast. Premium will either be a danstar or fermentis produce. Both are excellent sources of viable dry yeast that have a high enough cell count to directly pitch to your wort. So in my opinion I would pass on the "basic" yeast and upgrade the to premium dry and if you need a very specific yeast opt for the liquid form.
|
|
|
11-28-2012, 11:10 AM
|
#5
|
|
Fuggle
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Glendie (outside Fredericksburg), VA
Posts: 252
Liked 40 Times on 32 Posts Likes Given: 31
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BradleyBrew
Premium will either be a danstar or fermentis produce. Both are excellent sources of viable dry yeast that have a high enough cell count to directly pitch to your wort. So in my opinion I would pass on the "basic" yeast and upgrade the to premium dry and if you need a very specific yeast opt for the liquid form.
|
+1. Unless you are brewing a style whose flavor profile is yeast-dependent and requires a strain only available in liquid, I'd go with dry simply for its ease of use- for your second brew, there are other parts of your process you need to focus on without worrying about making starters, etc.
That being said, unless you're making a really high gravity beer, you can get away with using liquid without a starter. It might not be ideal, but it will still make good beer.
Let us know when you pick a style to brew and we can give more specific recommendations. Happy brewing! 
__________________
You can't be a real country unless you have a beer and an airline. It helps if you have some kind of a football team, or some nuclear weapons, but at the very least you need a beer. -Frank Zappa
|
|
|
11-28-2012, 04:50 PM
|
#6
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Amish Country, PA
Posts: 993
Liked 13 Times on 13 Posts Likes Given: 4
|
Agree, go with the premium dry (assuming it is Danstar or Fermentis) Being only your second batch, you're probably not ready to deal with a starter and you can make a lot great beers with the selection of dry yeasts out there. Be sure to properly re-hydrate it and enjoy the brew. There are some styles that really benefit from the liquid strains available, but more and more dry strains seem to be popping up.
__________________
Draft 1: Belgian Chocolate Stout
Draft 2: Belgian Wit
Draft 3: Double IPA
Primary 1: Irish Red Ale
Primary 2: Weizen
On Deck: Imperial Stout, Berry Wheat
|
|
|
11-28-2012, 05:01 PM
|
#7
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
Posts: 35
Liked 1 Times on 1 Posts
|
I think it's been all summed up. Liquid = more styles but you usually make a starter, Dry less styles but yet still very good, viable and you only "need" to rehydrate.
I put need in quotations because there is a big debate still on the question of rehydrating or not dry yeast. Some say you must, others say you don't.
I always rehydrate but I do so only when I know my wort is at pitching temperature.
|
|
|
11-28-2012, 05:08 PM
|
#8
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Upland, CA
Posts: 516
Liked 43 Times on 35 Posts Likes Given: 53
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kaz
Being only your second batch, you're probably not ready to deal with a starter .
|
I don't like this! Starters are retarded easy. Starters the way they are done by many HBT members are hard.
To make a starter you pitch your yeast into a mason jar 3/4 full of unboiled wort. Shake it every 10 minutes or so while you boil and cool. Your yeast has probably doubled in numbers and is ready to attack your wort and make it into beer.
If you do the super compliucated stir plate/flask/voodoo route that some do you'll make a great starter. I'll even agree it's a better starter than without. But you can make a fine starter without any of that equipment.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yooper
...it's fine if it's fermenting.
|
|
|
|
11-28-2012, 05:20 PM
|
#9
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Amish Country, PA
Posts: 993
Liked 13 Times on 13 Posts Likes Given: 4
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Halbrust
I don't like this! Starters are retarded easy. Starters the way they are done by many HBT members are hard.
|
Starters are easy, but I think for a second batch, one is better off sticking to the simpler dry yeast and focusing on perfecting their process, sanitation, equipment usage etc. I make starters with a stir plate and they are just as easy as making them in a mason jar with the exception that I getter better growth in the same amount of time.
__________________
Draft 1: Belgian Chocolate Stout
Draft 2: Belgian Wit
Draft 3: Double IPA
Primary 1: Irish Red Ale
Primary 2: Weizen
On Deck: Imperial Stout, Berry Wheat
|
|
|
11-28-2012, 05:25 PM
|
#10
|
|
Never forget...
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: McKinney, TX
Posts: 6,878
Liked 1548 Times on 1535 Posts Likes Given: 3
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Halbrust
I don't like this! Starters are retarded easy. Starters the way they are done by many HBT members are hard.
To make a starter you pitch your yeast into a mason jar 3/4 full of unboiled wort. Shake it every 10 minutes or so while you boil and cool. Your yeast has probably doubled in numbers and is ready to attack your wort and make it into beer.
If you do the super compliucated stir plate/flask/voodoo route that some do you'll make a great starter. I'll even agree it's a better starter than without. But you can make a fine starter without any of that equipment.
|
I think if you are pitching yeast into unboiled wort and then boiling it, you are screwing up royally! Yes, starters are super easy but this advice is just plain wrong! To make a starter add 4 cups water/1 cup DME and boil for 10 min. Cool to 70F-ish transfer into a jar or something and shake it everytime you walk by it. 24 hours later you have a perfect ~1 liter starter. Nothing to it.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by marubozo
He's too retarded to do anything on his own, but I can easily throw him down a slide.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by shecky
Doritos are evil. Taco Bell is evil. Ergo, Ginger is Satan.
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
|
|
|